Heath Evans.."Tannehill will be the best out of three", good article.

I watched the majority of Phil Simms playing career...the last thing I would say about Phil Simms is that he was weak armed. The way the wind swirled in the old Giants Stadium, you couldnt play QB there if you had a weak arm. As a matter of fact it was Simms accuracy that drove Parcells nuts until Simms 6th or 7th year in the league. The one thing Simms could always do was spin it, just wasnt always to the right team. He eventually became a very good QB but it took him a while and the problem was never arm strength.

 

I agree, also Simms had a few injurys early in his career that kept him from progressing, so he became a late bloomer.

Now for the subject of the thread, I really dont care if he is the best of the three because that could mean he is the equivalent of the best turd in the toilet. I just want Tannehill to be very very successful regardless of what the other two do, infact i dont care if they (RGIII/Luck) are better QBs, I just want RT to win and win alot and win big.

And just as a refresher IMHO Marino was the best of his draft class, I'd rather have SB wins than a QB with breakable records and no SB championships.