The same as it is now, IMO. It gave him an advantage knowing the playbook but had it been different I think he would have had a full grasp of it by week 1 anyway. The results would most likely be the same.
It's probably closer to 80 with starting receivers who could break some TDs and contribute more in the redzone than just 1 TD in 14 attempts.
I think running a different offense would've involved more than just memorizing the playbook. There would be far less facility within it for him on gameday IMO.
In your hypothetical... does he still have the crap he has at WR? If so, probably lower. If he had a new offense, but better WRs... he'd have a higher rating than he does now. Why don't you ever state your opinion and reasoning in the original post of these types of threads? Just post a question and a poll. Is there somewhere you are going with this question? Or a point you are trying to make?
I dont understand the purpose of this either... I mean who cares what the answer to a hypothetical question would be, about Tannehills QBR in a different offense? It's completely irrelevant to anything IMO. I say 100+ Because my reasoning, is just as hypothetical, and make believe as yours, or anyone elses will be in this thread, because there's no way to know.
So what? Have a little fun already. My lord. Is there some other thread here where you see some sort of exact science happening? Feel free to frequent those instead.
Could be a legitimate argument for higher, lower, or the same. Less understanding of the playbook could mean it's scaled back and safer, and more conducive to QB rating. The other two are pretty self explanatory.
Do you think they've scaled back the one he's using currently to allow for his transition into the NFL?
Probably the same IMO. Running a different scheme would hurt him, but at the same time it could also give some of the TDs that have gone to RBs to Tannehill.
He sucks. We need winners. We need Cleo Lemon. Oh, where have you gone, Cleonardo? [VIDEO=youtube;8nYGdoYOdjQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nYGdoYOdjQ[/VIDEO]
I voted 50-59. I did so, because, if he weren't running the same offense that he had in college, he wouldn't be starting this year.
