Oh, I think someone doesn't get it...not sure it's me. I'm not minimizing someone else's wrongdoing, I'm just not defending the other wrongdoing.
Thanks for chiming in! I am civil. I have never been arrested for anything (let alone fighting), I hate drugs, pay taxes and am generally a very pleasant person who believes in treating people how they deserve to be treated. And in this *** backwards, twisted world of greed and selfishness I put my family before anything. Is it civil to sexually assault others? Have you read the rest of my comments? Standing up for yourself very rarely involves beating on someone.
You don't have the right to determine how someone should be punished. No, it is not civil to sexaully assault anyone. That doesn't justify kicking someone in the head. You lowered yourself to his level.
Not a lawyer, just a civilized human that doesn't need to resort to violence to boost my self-esteem.
Neither am I. Right now I'm very seriously questioning your reading comprehension and/or your ability to not jump to conclusions about people with a closed mind.
I'm not jumping to any conclusions. You said someone pinched your wife's rear, she walked out of the bar crying, and you then assaulted him because you felt he deserved it. What conclusions have I jumped to?
If somebody pinched my wife's ***, I'd pop him. That's a lot different from getting drunk at a football game and ganging up to stomp the **** out of an opposing fan, though.
Maybe a couple of you guys do not know how to defend yourself..who knows...simple...don't start none...won't be none!! Seems like you as well asnresnor are defending the wrong person besides you two go back a ways and read and you will get my point! End of discussion
People are confused. They are too concerned now a days about humans rights when they should be more concerned about human decency.
Do tell. Show me where I said that the others wrongdoing wasn't wrong. All I'm saying is that two wrongs don't make a right. Someone being a douchebag doesn't give you right to be assaultive. I guess spin that into me defending the first jerk over the jerk responding with violence.
I said you minimized it, which you did when you said (I'll loosely quote) "pinching someone, or other silly matters". Repeatedly pinching a girls ***, when they are telling you to stop to the point that one of them runs out crying, is not "silly". Comprehend? You are also way oversimplifying things and twisting words/reality when you say that I'm ok with "punching people I have a problem with". You are being thick headed and arguing just to argue.
No, I'm not arguing to argue. You accused me of not being a decent person. I said silly to differentiate between something serious, e.g., someone attacking you with the intent of doing bodily harm, and someone doing something that isn't worthy of people kicking him and punching him. You are the one arguing to argue. I guess agree to disagree on the legitimacy of resorting to violence to solve or problems.
Why would I accuse you of not being a decent person? I'm a sure you are. Again, that kind of thing (sexual assault) IS serious, not silly. I just can't understand why someone, as a man, would let his loved one be groped against their will and think twice about kicking the **** out of him. But w/e.... We can agree to disagree. I have no problem with that.