I dont value Kiper, but it is infomation none the less.....enjoy folks...love the theme though....big play guys obviously, although I dont agree with Kindle at 12....alot of us fans dont want Williams cuz he isnt that fun exciting picks, but folks, Parcells loves him a NT....it is just who is making the call... http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=5044327&categoryid=2459789
Say what you like about Kiper, but he was right about White. He was drafted to high and he should be a wr/kr. I hate to say it but Mel was right on this one.
Mel Kiper: Dez Bryant, Dan Williams may go early http://blogs.palmbeachpost.com/thed...l-kiper-dez-bryant-dan-williams-may-go-early/
i am not on the Williams bandwagon ... i think Odrick has more potential -- just don't see us picking Williams at 12, especially when you can pick Joseph in rd 4 .... Bryant is a definite possibility ... but somehow i even doubt that one. they are going off of need .... of course we need a NT, WR, OLB, S ... and S doesn't 'generally' go high in rd 1 (albeit, Berry most certainly will -- or we WILL pick him, before both Williams or Bryant every day of the week).
az ... with ya bro -- i don't think we go DT/NT at all until later in the draft ... can't see us taking one at 12 but if i was forced to pick, i would pick Odrick - start him off as a DE, then work him slowly towards NT ... unless he just proved to be too good a DE to move.
Yes you did. I think our FO has done a good job but I still do not understand that pick if he was only going to be a backup QB or wildcat QB. Many of our draft gerus like KB21 did not like it as a pick that high. Do you think it was Parcells pick or Ireland liked him. Another question does anybody think White would be a good return man ? I dont think he ever did it in college.
the white experiment has bust written all over it the other glaring mistake was letting matt roth walk
