1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The Blame Game: Who Should Pay? (An Analysis)

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by NaboCane, Dec 13, 2007.

  1. NaboCane

    NaboCane Banned

    31,949
    11,899
    0
    Nov 24, 2007
    A lot has been said on the topic of accountability for the Miami Dolphins’ current predicament.

    A situation so awful, so full of bad acts and bad decisions as this one leaves us wanting to place blame. Usually in a case like this – especially in sports - blame goes to the head guy.

    In baseball, it is always the Manager of a baseball team that gets the axe when his team fails to satisfy. In basketball, it’s the Coach. In football, it’s almost always the Head Coach.

    And that is where one faction on this board would like to lay the blame for the entire mess – all of it.

    Yet another faction advocates lenience with our Head Coach, Cam Cameron, citing the decided lack of adequate talent on the team he was given to coach.

    What is difficult for us to separate is the responsibility for the different factors that went into creating this mess, but unless we want to go on simply ranting to make ourselves feel better, we absolutely must.

    There are many issues with the team as it stands today; many reasons why it is as bad as it is. but if we look at those reasons closely, they fall mainly into one global, overall factor, and two catch-all "umbrellas" on a middle-management level.

    The global reason is Huizenga’s refusal to structure the Dolphins' football operation like any corporation has its different main areas of responsibility - in a manner to provide accountability.

    I said from the resignation of Wannstedt that Huizenga should:
    1. Establish the Dolphins’ management structure as two departments, Operations (the football side) and Finance; hire a President or simply promote Weidmeyer to the position, and hire VP's for each department. Those departments would report to him, but the VP's would be fully empowered to make decisions as regard their departments autonomously.
    2. Make Mueller (or another present GM) the VP of football ops; have the Head Coach report to him, be responsible to him and be hireable/fireable by him.
    3. Let Mueller/the VP conduct the search for a new Head Coach and hire the candidate he deems appropriate.
    4. Have the Head Coach be responsible for the team and its management structure and staff, but have all pro personnel and draft decisions remain under Mueller's purview.
    5. If the Head Coach fails, it's Mueller's responsibility to right the ship, fire the coach and hire a new one.
    Instead, what you have now is a system where no one really knows where the responsibility of the one ends and the other's begins. There’s too much gray area.

    Each side gets to point the finger at the other in a given situation because they share responsibility. it makes for a lack of accountability. There are visible areas of responsibility in terms of traditional roles, but the lines at the edges where the two meet are blurred.

    that's the global factor; Huizenga’s failure as a businessman to see that the team, when all is said and done, is a business and should be structured as one - with built-in accountability at each level, but each level accountable to one person.

    Then we look at the micro-factors that have gone into making this season the nightmare that it is: past personnel decisions - up to and including the 2007 draft - and the team personnel and staff, their management and the game day management.

    Mueller and Cameron.

    This where the board in general has had a problem distinguishing among the reasons for each issue.

    One train of thought that couldn't be more mistaken is to blame everything - lock, stock and barrel - on personnel decisions.

    Yes, we have awful players, yes, decisions made in the draft going back to 1997 have hampered us along the way from there to here, and the continuation of bad calls has compounded into the horror that is today's roster. It makes the Dolphins a bad, bad team.

    But there is a point at which being a bad team ceases to be an excuse for how the players, bad as they might be, play.

    In other words: bad teams are nothing new to the NFL.

    There have always been Bill Bidwill's; Georgia Frontiere's; Al Davis's. Bad team owners who have, for one reason or another - usually either stubborn penuriousness or simply being egomaniacal asshats - doomed their respective teams to year after year, sometimes decades of failure on the field.

    Then there are teams which have simply fallen on hard times, usually through poor decision-making on the personnel side of the operation, whatever factors drove that scenario for each of them.

    The current manifestation of our Dolphins could be said to fall into this latter category.

    However, no matter how bad bad teams have ever been, only one team in NFL history has managed to fail to win a single game in an entire season - the 1976 Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

    Add together all the seasons played post-merger; add the number of teams which played each season; the number in that data group is over 1,000. Only one team during that span, in over one thousand seasons, managed the ultimate level of futility.

    Given all of the bad teams - truly awful teams - which have played during that time, only one didn't win a game in an entire season. what that means, is that there is more to that "accomplishment" than simply being a bad team, a team lacking in talent.

    One in one thousand. That’s very special.

    It requires that a team not only be inherently awful, but that it also lack the ability to even just put itself in luck's way - to allow itself to benefit from the slightest stroke of good fortune that has horrible teams winning games they have no business winning.

    It requires that key individual players quit on their teammates; that they quit and that other players see it, and quit as well, and that the quitting creates an atmosphere of discontent, and that the discontent divides the locker room and ultimately, that it all creates a culture of losing.

    Those players must be held accountable. They must understand that they need to execute their assignments regardless of how they feel about the quarterback under center, or the defensive coordinator, or even the head coach.

    They must play their best always, not only because they are professionals, but because the culture of "team" demands it of them - something they have learned through years of playing the game or any team sport since childhood.

    Unless they're spoiled little *****es.

    But who is responsible for the behavior of his players? Who is accountable for the team's culture once it is assembled, once it is the team with which the club has decided to go into the season? is it the gm? the president? the owner?

    We know the answer: the Head Coach.

    It is the Head Coach who decides which players start, which play, which sit. He alone is "where the buck stops" in every phase of his team after the gm hands him the keys to the car he's built - the car that presumably, they've built together.

    That is why I hold Cameron responsible for the product he has put on the field this season.

    I hold him accountable for not playing his young skill players sooner than he did, despite throwing his rookie center into the fire from day one, thereby demonstrating that he had no compunction about playing rookies.

    I hold him accountable for his arrogance in not appointing even a de-facto Offensive Coordinator and trying to call plays himself, and how that has hurt the team - not to mention the development of his young skill players and his rookie quarterback.

    I hold him accountable for permitting the defensive coordinator in his charge to go away from a system which had essentially the same unit one of the top-rated defense last year; to play his best player and his one big-dollar free agent acquisition out of the positions in which they enjoyed their greatest success.

    But most of all, I hold him accountable for not holding his players accountable. For seeing what we all saw in the last couple of weeks: his players quitting on the team, and not having the stones to do something about it.

    For not punishing his entire offensive line for their shameful refusal to block at all for young Mr. Beck, then blocking just fine from the moment that lemon replaced Beck, I hold him accountable.

    For not benching Jason Taylor for dogging it the way he has since day one of this season, I hold him accountable.

    But most of all, for allowing the culture on his team to get worse than anything we saw in the Wannstedt era, I hold him accountable.

    And for all of that, not for the dearth of talent, nor the failures of coaches and GM's before him, I hold him accountable.

    Wayne Huizenga should hold him no less accountable.
     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2007
  2. azstryker

    azstryker New Member

    242
    1
    0
    Dec 2, 2007
    I'm sorry but did you say we need to give mueller more power and allow him to make more decsions??? As much as I want to blame Cam for that turd of a draft Mueller had a great deal if not most of the say.
     
  3. pocoloco

    pocoloco I'm your huckleberry Club Member

    8,444
    5,721
    113
    Nov 28, 2007
    North Chicagoland
    well written, agree completely. And we could do a lot better than Mueller as well, probably without looking around too hard
     
  4. WaywardZest

    WaywardZest New Member

    156
    4
    0
    Dec 3, 2007
    Great post.

    People need to realize that this team won 6 games in 2006 and was competitive in others. There is no excuse for 0-13. You can't blame players in an era of salary cap and parity. As extraordinary as the Patriots season is despite parity, Cameron's season is that disgusting. At least the 1976 Buccaneers were an expansion team.
     
  5. daltoninnm

    daltoninnm New Member

    7
    0
    0
    Dec 8, 2007
    I agree. Mueller must be held accountable.
     
  6. NaboCane

    NaboCane Banned

    31,949
    11,899
    0
    Nov 24, 2007
    are you part of our fort lewis stryker brigade?
     
  7. AggieFin21

    AggieFin21 New Member

    47
    0
    0
    Dec 3, 2007
    Excellent post! I agree completely.

    Cam must go. End of story.
     
  8. Rick 1966

    Rick 1966 Professional Hipshooter

    8,565
    3,821
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Powell, WY
    In reality, what we need is an owner that has enough sense to hire a good football guy to run the team. We ain't gonna get that, so we have to hope he keeps firing and hiring until he finally gets lucky. I am not optimistic about those prospects.
     
  9. PhinFantic

    PhinFantic New Member

    277
    7
    0
    Dec 12, 2007
    New Jersey
    Exellent post ! If this team goes 0-16, then a total change has to be made by accountability starting with Mueller and Cameron. This has been brought up several times in other threads here. Also , I feel bad for all the season ticket holders, Huizienga should give them a great discount back for attending the games.
     
  10. Dmarino110

    Dmarino110 New Member

    71
    1
    0
    Dec 10, 2007
    that was beautiful man. A must read for every dolphins fan who is tired of hearing how cam cant be blamed in his 1st season. And maybe just maybe some of the people that say you cant blame cam will actually read it all and a light will go off in their heads. They will then realize how stupid defending him actually is.
     
  11. MDFINFAN

    MDFINFAN New Member

    1,328
    182
    0
    Nov 29, 2007
    While I agree, that for the team, the buck stops at the HC, there are things I've seen this year that gives me hope for the future, and the one thing is the rookies we have, like them or not, these guys aren't bad, once they were allowed to play. I was somewhat disappointed with our DT Soliai, but he's grown since day 1. We have a starting Center, a starting WR, a in the mix DT Soliai, Booker is coming on, Beck needs time, Mauia is our starting FB, Quentin Moses, Edmond Miles, Brandon Fields (starting punter), on IR, but showed something: Abraham Wright,Drew Mormino. Then there's the 2nd year guys starting to play a little, Jason Allen, Steve Fifita, and while he's still not as consistent as I'd like, Derek Hagan is starting to show up. Our OL is better, just need a better LG and RT. The experience these guys gain this year should help in year 2 and 3. Now the middle guys are what we have to address, the 4-8 year players..WE need better. But this is the first rookie class I've seen in a long time that I think can give us a foundation..
     
  12. NorFlaFin

    NorFlaFin Active Member

    Ron Wolf (I believe is available)
     
  13. NaboCane

    NaboCane Banned

    31,949
    11,899
    0
    Nov 24, 2007
    from an article posted earlier by ffic (thanks john!)

    http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/NFL/AFC/AFC+East/Miami/WWHI/2007/wwhi121407.htm

    for those who say that there would be no difference if cam went winless or won just one game. the significance of going winless cannot be discounted, no matter how much you want to call names about it.
     
  14. PhinFantic

    PhinFantic New Member

    277
    7
    0
    Dec 12, 2007
    New Jersey
    Exactly ! Others have posted this before. There is NO way that this team can go winless, no matter what the circumstances are ! That would be inexcusible with a 16 game schedule even for an expansion team.
     

Share This Page