1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

If we get one back, which RB do you choose?

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by Ohio Fanatic, May 6, 2011.

If we get one back, which RB do you choose?

  1. Sign ronnie

    64.4%
  2. Sign ricky

    28.7%
  3. Neither, stick with Hilliard

    6.9%
  1. Ohio Fanatic

    Ohio Fanatic Twuaddle or bust Club Member

    32,130
    22,949
    113
    Nov 26, 2007
    Concord, MA
    If Jeff Ireland gets to sign one of eith Ronnie or Ricky as our #2 RB, which RB do you choose? Assuming that the price is reasonable and we cannot get that COP back we all have been pining for (sproles or bush).
     
  2. Ohio Fanatic

    Ohio Fanatic Twuaddle or bust Club Member

    32,130
    22,949
    113
    Nov 26, 2007
    Concord, MA
    I choose Ricky. He is older, but he's the more instinctive back by far and he's a lot tougher
     
    Crappy Tipper, PSG and SCall13 like this.
  3. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    I chose Ricky too, so, so far he has a huge lead in the polls ;)
     
    SCall13 and Ohio Fanatic like this.
  4. NaboCane

    NaboCane Banned

    31,949
    11,899
    0
    Nov 24, 2007
    Neither; but Ricky would be a better choice for 3rd Back off the bench.

    Forget Hilliard; he had his shot and blew it.
     
    HULKFish and Ohio Fanatic like this.
  5. Ohio Fanatic

    Ohio Fanatic Twuaddle or bust Club Member

    32,130
    22,949
    113
    Nov 26, 2007
    Concord, MA
    Agreed, hilliard isn't that special, would rather see his touches go to our rookies
     
  6. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    Wonder Bread, Hellman's mayo, and Oscar Mayer baloney, now there is a real All American lunch entree.
     
  7. Pandarilla

    Pandarilla Purist Emeritus

    14,282
    5,005
    113
    Sep 10, 2009
    Boone, NC
    Sign Ronnie and play him at FB.
     
  8. FinsAreLife

    FinsAreLife Well-Known Member

    2,824
    762
    113
    Dec 7, 2007
    Id rather see Ricky come back honestly
     
    SCall13 likes this.
  9. Frumundah Finnatic

    Frumundah Finnatic U Mad Miami?

    39,245
    10,681
    0
    Dec 2, 2007
    Miami FL
    Ricky, that way we can bet on which one will fumble more.
     
  10. godolphins

    godolphins New Member

    298
    91
    0
    Apr 8, 2010
    Neither, stick with Hilliard: Ricky is in his mid 30's and DT will be the bruiser so there's no need for Ronnie at all

    I'm just tired of seeing them in the back field, let's just move on and start fresh.
     
  11. xphinfanx

    xphinfanx Stay strong my friends.

    10,823
    2,214
    113
    Nov 1, 2009
    Ronnie if he don't step up immediately cut him. No to Ricky because of his bad attitude and mouthing the team no tolerance for a teammate dragging the whole team down when things aren't going right a bad apple just makes it worse.(and his fumbles last season were terrible) terrible terrible.TERRIBLE.
     
  12. VanDolPhan

    VanDolPhan Club member Club Member

    13,063
    8,900
    113
    Nov 26, 2007
    Hamilton, Ontario Canada
    Hilliard but only to compete with our new h-back who intrigues me as the guy who picks up 6-8 carries a game. We know the kid can catch which makes him valuable coming out of the backfield on passing downs.
     
  13. NaboCane

    NaboCane Banned

    31,949
    11,899
    0
    Nov 24, 2007
    Better than meatballs with a side of sanctimony.
     
  14. Ozzy

    Ozzy Premium Member Luxury Box

    I would have much rather voted no to all three which means bringing in at least two other Rb's but given the choices, I'll take Ronnie.

    As much as I like Ricky's style of running and his vision it would be a big risk hoping he does not lose yet another step.
     
  15. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    If those are our only 2 choices, then I agree.

    Edit: What I really miss is Adams Peanut Butter, and strawberry jam on whole wheat toast.
     
    NaboCane likes this.
  16. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    I picked Ricky because: 1. He is more durable. 2. He has been more productive over the past two seasons. 3. He has better vision and instincts as a runner. 4. He is more likely to sign for 1 year and for less money than Ronnie would want. The only negative with Ricky I see is he has lost a step and doesn't have the burst he did in his prime. Still, with our improved OL, as a backup to Thomas, I think Ricky would be just fine to get about 1/3 of the carries and give us over 4 ypc when he is in the game.
     
  17. Ozzy

    Ozzy Premium Member Luxury Box

    Hard to argue with anything here but the one thing that could push Ireland to choose Ricky is what you said in bold. One year, one decent salary. As opposed to Ronnie probably wanting a ton and a big bonus.
     
    MrClean likes this.
  18. Desides

    Desides Well-Known Member

    38,949
    20,033
    113
    Nov 28, 2007
    Pembroke Pines, FL
    When did that happen?

    And where’s the “none of the above” option on the poll? :lol:
     
  19. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Well, to me bring backs in as well, to me if there is one position that needs competition it is the Running Back corps.

    To me, all 3 are more or less the same back.
     
  20. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    What has Ronnie proven lately, other than he has poor vision as a runner and gets hurt a lot?
     
    HeyBaldy and NaboCane like this.
  21. DHPVW

    DHPVW DuB addict

    1,516
    248
    0
    Apr 1, 2010
    AZ-520
    Re-sign Brown and let him have more carries with a decent Oline and see how it goes. Brown has proven how dynamic he can be in the past. He's not exactly that old so I'd like to see if he's got something left. Ricky is replaceable talent at this point. He doesn't offer anything that we can't get from another back, unless you count his fumbles as a plus
     
    Puka-head, xphinfanx and Fin D like this.
  22. CaribPhin

    CaribPhin Guest

    None of the above.
     
  23. vt_dolfan

    vt_dolfan Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    I dont really see the point in bringing either back now....not with Thomas on board.

    Deangelo Williams....hes already said he has no problem splitting caries...and he has the extra giddyup to be the perfect complimentary back....
     
  24. rafael

    rafael Well-Known Member

    27,364
    31,261
    113
    Apr 6, 2008
    I think there's a chance that Brown could be really effective in Daboll's offense since I expect the backs to be used as outlet receivers. I think back to when Brown was in Cam's offense. He looked like a top 5 back before the injury. Now the injury thing will always be there, but Brown at that level of production would still be attractive. I think he was that productive b/c of the use as a receiver and b/c of the types of plays he ran. Brown simply isn't good at the quick hitters, but he does have excellent vision, power and balance. You use him on pull plays and he's incredible.

    Now I also like Deangelo Williams, but I have a feeling that Brown will come much cheaper. And I do have a great deal of faith in Daniel Thomas. I think Thomas, Brown (or Williams) and Hilliard is a really nice stable. Then again that might be overkill. If Clay shows enough in camp, I wouldn't be shocked to see us go in to the season with Thomas, Hilliard, Clay (in a Hillis type role) with speed back like Sproles. And you'd still have Polite as the pure FB and short yardage specialist. Tat may allow us to use a roster spot for some other position.
     
    CrunchTime likes this.
  25. Disgustipate

    Disgustipate Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    31,633
    55,690
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    I don't think Brown is a very good fit because of the amount of zone running is in Daboll's offense. His vision isn't very good, and Daniel Thomas is almost the same guy with some of the power traded for vision.
     
  26. slickj101

    slickj101 Is Water

    15,886
    8,901
    113
    Dec 21, 2007
    NY
    Ricky, since he's the better option in nearly every category. The other thing to add is that he carries a lot more weight in that lockerroom.
     
  27. rdhstlr23

    rdhstlr23 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    14,074
    11,142
    113
    Dec 2, 2007
    Chicago, IL
    I like Ronnie if our OLine is truly improved. Ricky is still an above average "plough ahead" runner. I think Ronnie still possesses better skills that make our offense "more explosive". I think he's quicker, more agile, and at this stage, a much better receiver. I think Ricky is better at hitting a hole, much more decisive, but i think that can be easily duplicated by a guy like Lex Hilliard.

    My only fear with Ronnie is history has dictated he's a guy that becomes increasingly more effective with more touches. With the potential for less touches with a fresh rookie that could lower his effectiveness. However on the flip side, there is a chance for Ronnie to increase production if he's now the guy running the ball in the 4th quarter where we usually saw Ricky Williams handling those touches. Now Ronnie runs against those tired defenses. Just something to think about.

    IF they resign one of those guys, I hope it's Ronnie. I'm still interested in the Reggie Bush or Darren Sproles acquisition.
     
    Ophinerated likes this.
  28. steakburger

    steakburger New Member

    2
    0
    0
    May 7, 2011
    Ricky Williams could play for another 2 years.Just have a feeling he should be the one to keep.......
     
  29. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    Sure, Thomas hasn't proven anything yet, and should not be handed anything without earning it. I'm just of the opinion between keeping just one of the R&R combo, I'd keep Ricky for reasons previously given. That was what this thread was about. If we were gonna keep one and just one, which would you choose. You chose Ronnie for reasons you gave, I chose Ricky for reasons I gave.
     
    HeyBaldy likes this.
  30. Paul 13

    Paul 13 Chaotic Neutral & Unstable Genius Staff Member

    85,620
    51,682
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    I chose Ronnie for selfish reasons... Two years ago I purchased replica jerseys of Henne and Ronnie... I'd like to wear one on game days this year without looking like a complete fool, which is going to be difficult anyway, I know. Hey at least they weren't authentics...
     
    PSG, Ozzy and padre31 like this.
  31. Skeet84

    Skeet84 New Member

    7,661
    2,275
    0
    Dec 14, 2007
    We need a change of pace back. Thomas and Brown are a like in a lot of ways. I would not mind signing someone else with more speed
     
  32. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    As I recall, the OP does not mention Thomas at all. His entire premise was if we keep only one of R&R, which one would it be, or the 3rd option was neither. That this would be as a backup for Thomas and him already anointed the starter would be just an assumption, if made by anyone else posting in the thread.
     
  33. CrunchTime

    CrunchTime Administrator Retired Administrator

    23,327
    35,934
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Last years offense was dysfunctional.All the way from questionable playcalling ,a rotating OL that never seemed to gell ,lack of speed on offense .

    As a result Ronnie and Ricky did not look good.I dont think Ronnie is done by any means .As Rafael has said I think he will thrive in Daboll's offense .

    If we retain one of those backs I vote for Ronnie .

    Ricky is the one thats showing signs of being done IMO and his fumbling was disturbing .
     
  34. MrClean

    MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member

    If Ricky is showing his age more than Ronnie, why was Ricky the more productive between them over the last two seasons combined?
     
  35. the 23rd

    the 23rd a.k.a. Rio

    9,173
    2,398
    113
    Apr 20, 2009
    Tampa Area
    Ricky
     
  36. PSG

    PSG Clear Eyes. Full Hearts.

    9,767
    3,436
    113
    Nov 24, 2007
    North of the Border
    :smackhead:
     
  37. Killerphins

    Killerphins The Finger

    9,313
    4,169
    0
    Nov 11, 2008
    Just how does a rookie who hasn't played an NFL snap supposed to prove himself at this point. Of course he hasn't proven anything. :hammer:
    Ronnie has proven some things. That he is a less than durable average to decent running back who will want way too much money for what he is worth. We have all seen what Ronnie can do and it has been underwhelming to say the least for a #2 overall pick. He is indecisive and never really had that second gear. I'm ready to move on.
    Keep Ricky if possible and go with some fresh blood in Thomas.
     
  38. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Makes sense, to me when I watched the offense the middle of the Oline was being pushed into the backfield or allowing outright penetration far to often.

    When Richie I played Center that stopped, then Berger was reinserted because McQuistan had to fill in at RT when Carey and Murtha went down and the patriots simply murdered us.

    TBH, I'd take Ronnie B over Ricky W at this point, then again I'd like us to take a look at Cedric Benson as well back to back 1k season in Cinci is no small thing and like Ricky W he is a low mileage running back.
     
    RoninFin4 and CrunchTime like this.
  39. cdz12250

    cdz12250 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    10,272
    7,928
    113
    Nov 28, 2007
    Coconut Grove
    Both Ricky and Ronnie have a problem outrunning even linebackers when they get to the second level. As much as I like Ricky, we need a speed back.
     
  40. HULKFish

    HULKFish Artist and Scribe

    6,715
    1,298
    113
    Apr 30, 2008
    Central FL
    I voted Ronnie and I'd like to see him back in Miami... That being said, I'm interested in DeAngelo Williams and Cedric too. If Ronnie could just stay healthy, he'd be a no-brainer!
     

Share This Page