Yeah. They really needed someone who lived Charlie's lifestyle in real life like Charlie did. But then again, that did lead to his demise. Oh well. The show had a great run.
Exactly. What the **** are they thinking? Just this morning I read that Hugh Grant was offered a ton of money to replace Sheen, and I thought, "PERFECT!" I mean, how spot-on is HE for that role? Now this. Ashton ****ing Kutcher? Let's just get it out of the way now: Two and a Half Men died from... The Butterfly Effect.
That was meant more in a "officially jump the shark" sort of way. But yeah, come to think of it, he does come off as a sleezebag (character) too lol.
I just love how back in the day whenever a show needed to replace someone they used to call in good old Ted McGinley. I think it would have been funny. To be fair to McGinley, I thought he was pretty good on Married With Children.
This will not end well. I will enjoy watching it go down in flames from afar because I sure as hell won't be watching this rubbish.
Good ole Jefferson Darcy! Haha, never thought id see that reference again I cant believe they chose Ashton Butcher...of all the people to choose. George Clooney could have at least passed off the Charlie Harper sleazebag effect or if they wanted a whole new character they could have introduced Pam Anderson as Charlie's long lost sister who sleeps with every guy in Malibu!
You know, when I heard Aston Kutcher was replacing Charlie Sheen, like all of you I thought WTF? Not that I can't picture Ashton Kutcher as Charlie Harper...I could see it, but Charlie Harper is Alan Harper's OLDER brother. Charlie Sheen is 12 years older than Kutcher and I believe Kutcher is 8-9 years YOUNGER than Jon Cryer. Leave it to CBS to once again...as usual...screw up a good show.
I am intrested to see how they write Sheen's character out. "*** raped to death by a pack of wild boars" is my guess.
Yeah; think "Chef" in his final SP...mind-****ed, killed, soils himself and then eaten by wild animals.
