[video]http://www.movieweb.com/movie/the-avengers/trailer-2[/video] Every other movie ever has just been ruled insignificant.
wait, wait oh oh there it is.........aaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwww zzzzzzzzzzzzz I would have preferred they kept edward norton though.
Hulk is a deep, dark character afraid of himself and at the same time trying to be heroic. Yes its important.
So as long as you have an actor with chops they can pull it off. Norton didn't do anything in Hulk that hundreds of other actors could have done. American History X? Yes, only Norton could have played that role. Bruce Banner? Not so much...especially in an ensemble film where Banner's screen time won't be carrying the movie. Don't get me wrong, Norton is one of the best actors of his generation, its just that his skill is not needed for half a role in a movie like this.
I never said the guy doing it now couldn't pull it off. I did say I would have rather they kept norton as you stated he is a good actor, and I think he did a good job in the last hulk.
norton has this really awful movie where he is this delusional cowboy. cant remember it. really bad. rent it if you want to ruin your night or if you don't like your girlfriend and want to sabotage a night for the hell of it lol
Norton would have made it a GrandSlam....without him, its a 3-run dinger...nice...but not a GrandSlam! And I would feel that way if any other ACTOR was removed from their role!
I havent really looked into it, does anyone know if just Loki is the main villian or is there a larger threat? I cant see just Loki causing this much trouble.
