In a world where children suffer daily from disease and poverty and millions of underprivileged are disenfranchised in even the most democratic of societies, can we truly say that our off-season is? If the magnitude of a situation determines its "realness", can we truly say that an offseason is real? Is it just a bubble of distractions allowing helpless individuals to cope with the pratfalls of everyday living? Our offseason may be, but to what degree? Is it manufactured? Much like our insulated lives. Can Greg Jennings be said to be the answer when the question is so inconsequential? Can the ire that Ireland receives be justified when the Isle of Ireland is filled with ire at not being independent? Are Sean Smith's lapses truly devastating to a team that earns millions in revenue? Are we begging questions that are so unimportant that their answers are effectively meaningless?
I like Jennings but they better not pay big money for him. He has slowed down a few steps in 2012. Great add to the team but has to be a good price. I think Jennings, Harvin, Bowe,Hartline and Bess would perhaps be one of the best in the NFL.
The real question to me is.... Is our offseason....just a very large and intricate computer simulation? Is the part of the Latice. Scientists and philosophers from some of the worlds most prestigious institutions believe they have developed a test that can verify the prescence of the latice. If our offseason goes well, perhaps brighter things are ahead. If not, might our plugs get pulled, ending years of frustration and futility?
These are type of discussions you hear in staff meetings. Many like to consider ourselves post-modern football fans.
Bingo. The other fans haven't been able connect with themselves from within. They shall see the light too, though. May this thread serve as the catalyst for introducing our brethren to post-modern football fandom.
