He's on the block. As a rookie, Doug Martin ran for 1,454 yards and 11 touchdowns. He also had 472 receiving yards. That was 5th in the NFL, heck of a deal for $1,542,620. With the Jaguars' RB depth, we're willing to part with Martin, but expect equal value back. Open to combo or players and picks, but are mainly looking for No. 1 WR, starting CB, LBs, DT and DE. PM me with offers. Given that it's Valentines Day, I may not be able to respond until tomorrow morning.
To sell them for higher then what they paid. A lot of folks have been making combination trades. Throwing 2-3 guys into a trade when if they are patient could probably sell a player for higher on an individual basis.
you implying that we don't? We play for keeps. We have our reasons why we are looking to deal him, if you want to know specifically PM me.
We're just looking to get the best pieces possible. Exploring all options seems like the responsible thing to do. I think we've done a heck of a lot with literally the worst team in the league (8 combined wins the past two seasons, very little assets, bad contracts, etc).
your memes don't work here... Some of the trading follows the one red paperclip philosophy. They're all heartless and don't know what feelings are being hurt, why would players want to come to a team that just plans on moving them... why...why -cries incoherently-
LOL, yup. I'd be more conscious of flipping guys if chemistry was at all a factor in this league, but it's not.
Well it depends on who does the voting right. I, myself consider real world implications of the flipping trades. As free as we are to trade names back and forth, I also have to consider we are GMs who have to manage people and do what's best for their teams. Hence why I don't necessarily think the best GM is the one who puts together an all star team but rather puts his team in the best positon to make the playoffs and how deep, and also long term ramifications.
I agree that we need to strongly consider players fitting into roles and schemes...but there's no way to gauge if a player's feelings are hurt by getting traded or anything like that. At least I wouldn't consider that in voting, seems like it opens up to too many scenarios IMO.
I wouldn't consider it the first time no, but if he's just used in trade after trade then it gets a bit ridiculous. Everyone has their own methods for voting though, so you never how it goes year to year. Especially on what kind of rookies you bring in.
It's a factor to me... but I account for one vote while there are many others voting as well. Side note, do you guys think co-GMs should account for just one vote or two separate votes? I can understand either way but I'm thinking just one vote total would be the better option.
Soooo this whole player's feelings thing.... I think this means Big E is screwed for trading Vontae Davis... poor guy.
