1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

New college rule

Discussion in 'College Sports' started by pumpdogs, Feb 17, 2013.

  1. Dan Griese

    Dan Griese New Member

    49
    12
    0
    Feb 15, 2013
    True, but in a lot cases its almost impossible to tell what someone's true intentions are. Headhunters need to be dealt with, but i dont think objectionable calls and judgement calls are the best way to go
     
    MAFishFan likes this.
  2. Triggercut

    Triggercut Well-Known Member

    717
    388
    63
    Aug 12, 2011
    If it,s 3rd and 10 all you have to do is through a intermediate pass over the middle, if he catches it, 1st down, if there's a hint of interference, 1st down, if the WR is hit to hard and drops it, 1st down. There are wr's that draw PI calls, soon they will hone their craft to draw big hit penalties.
     
  3. CaribPhin

    CaribPhin Guest

    NFLPA would never agree to such a waiver.
     
  4. brandon27

    brandon27 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    45,652
    19,304
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    Windsor, ON. CANADA
    The ideal solution to the problem, is teaching guys how to actually wrap up and tackle again, rather than launching themselves at each other, which puts everyone in jeopardy.
     
  5. Laces Out

    Laces Out Well-Known Member

    3,428
    937
    113
    Aug 4, 2011
    Omaha, Ne
    Again, proper form won't negate whiplash
     
  6. CitizenSnips

    CitizenSnips hmm.

    5,525
    4,219
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    PA
    Time for safeties to start going at the knees. Get ready for more acl/mcl tears then ever before in college football.
     
  7. Pauly

    Pauly Season Ticket Holder

    3,696
    3,744
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    I say it is a good rule. Rugby has it in place for the same types of hits and it is very rare to see the deliberate targeting of the head in play.

    Plenty of NFL players have delivered deliberate intentional high shots over the years knowing the worst that could happen was a fine. The system isn't having a strong enough deterrent, so ejection from the game should be on the table.
     
  8. MAFishFan

    MAFishFan Team Tannehill

    3,561
    447
    83
    Sep 20, 2011
    Massachusetts
    this. as an official, it's near impossible to judge intent. you have no idea what is going on inside someone's head. we have to watch enough crap going on at the same time in our section of the field. now we have to be mind readers. the 15 yard penalty is plenty. and if they are ruled unsportsmanlike, all it takes is 2 of those and they are gone from the game.
     
  9. pumpdogs

    pumpdogs Well-Known Member

    5,185
    2,907
    113
    Sep 22, 2009
    delaware
    I watching the 1985 bears on youtube and if you watch most of thier big hits are helmet to helmet.They would be flagged on a huge percentage of thier 72 sacks.You can't hit the qb low you can hit them high no w
    onder these quaterbacks put these huge numbers every year.Marino would dominate this league now and would he would no doubt in my mind have numerous superbowl rings.
     
  10. jw3102

    jw3102 season ticket holder

    7,760
    3,486
    113
    Sep 4, 2010
    Maui, Hawaii

    Marino dominated the NFL during his prime. He wasn't the reason the Dolphins didn't win any Super Bowls during that time. It was the lousy defense, and no running game which was the problem. If Marino was now in his prime, but he still had to play with a team with a lousy defense and no running game, he still wouldn't have any Super Bowl wins.

    One player, no matter how great he might be as a player can not win a Super Bowl by himself.
     
  11. MikeHoncho

    MikeHoncho -=| Censored |=-

    52,652
    25,565
    113
    Nov 13, 2009
    Just when I thought they couldn't possibly get any dumber. They go and do something like this...
     
  12. brandon27

    brandon27 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    45,652
    19,304
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    Windsor, ON. CANADA
    No, you're right it wont. Nothing ever will completely rid concussions from the game, but you can lessen them. That's what its all about. You can still have a hard hitting, physical game, without the head and neck injuries. There's zero need for guys to be out there leading with their helmets to make tackles. ZERO.
     
  13. Stringer Bell

    Stringer Bell Post Hard, Post Often Club Member

    44,356
    22,480
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    You don't need to judge intent. It really isn't that complicated; keep your head up when you tackle.
     
  14. pumpdogs

    pumpdogs Well-Known Member

    5,185
    2,907
    113
    Sep 22, 2009
    delaware
    Thats my whole pioint you don't need a great defence or a running game to win in this crappy league now.You win by scoring touchdowns through the air.
     
  15. Oboy

    Oboy Premium Member Luxury Box

    6,980
    2,760
    113
    Jan 3, 2008
    Coral Springs, FL
    The problem with this new rule is not that they are protecting "defenseless players". THAT IS GREAT. The problem is it is too subjective of a call in real speed. How many NFL games have we seen where a big legal hit on a wr is called this penalty because the refs are being trained to call the big hit. Not necessarily the illegal hit. Which with this rule you are going to end up ejecting a player for a clean, but big hit. It is going to happen. I really do not like that. Keep the 15 yard penalty, have the league review ALL of those hits (called and not called) then decide if that player should be suspended or not. If it is a really obvious illegal hit then suspend the kid for multiple games. That, IMO keeps all sides happy. It gets the point across to the players to be clean, but protects the refs from making a bad call in the heat of the moment.
     
    Skeet84 and Laces Out like this.

Share This Page