Beefing up the line. Watch out for Boik...he might trip you on his way up as he rushes to draft your guy!
Great pick by the Seahawks. We were torn between Te'o and Arthur Brown at 35, but felt that Brown would be better paired with Kevin Minter. I wonder if the Seahawks are still going to run the 3-3-5 now though and am curious to see how Te'o would fit in it being that his coverage skills and speed have been questioned. Although he would give him some 3-4 flexibility which is nice. As a side note, anyone else getting kind of tired of just watching these teams that started off with a complete team just go BPA after BPA, while the lesser teams have to claw and scrape their way out of the gutter and fill holes with their picks? Lol
Aye. Buffalo...home of the talentless, bloated contract, no qb. No one wants em..hence they are like "hey your new......buffalo's yours!" ;p
Come on Bungles........This GM has a pillow waiting! (Now I'm betting a few GM's here wonder if I'm talking sleep............or smothering him......I'll never tell!).
oh, don't worry, I'm still staying on as Griddles' asst. I have far too many ideas to still implement. Dead money, June 1st cuts, overhauling FA, giving people their 3rd and 4th and 5th teams. It'll be a blast.
In honor of Mach's Killjoys comment...I bring 90's local band.............The Killjoys! I think the song fits his mood! [video=youtube;u_T04rO50po]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_T04rO50po[/video]
mmm, vagina. Not that your acne face would know about that. That was a joke playing off of earlier, if it wasn't clear
Problem was 2 of Buffalo's 4 best players WERE FA's. Ended up only keeping 1 in the end (Spiller) In fact looking at that Buffalo roster it's nearly overhauled. I think there is like 3 guys left lol
I'm not sure what I am doing yet. With cyprien gone I need to rethink this. I'm probably going to take a little while and will entertain a trade down possibly
Seattle is running a 3-3-5 base but will have 2-4-5 looks as well as 3-4 looks. Two's speed may be questioned but he's still always around the ball and had a handful of ints last year. He also gives us scheme flexibility so HC Pete Carroll can play mad scientist on D
What about auctioning teams off based on salary cap. Kind of like reverse bidding? For example we will take the ESPN rankings and start with the best team and then start at an average Salary cap and then people will bid lower amounts of salary to get that team. For example, We could do something like this: Ravens #1 ranked team (since they won the Super Bowl) current salary cap: $XXX,XXX,XXX we will start the bidding at $130,000,000. UCF FINatic bids on the Ravens for $125,000,000. Boik bids $122,000,000 on the Ravens GIK bids $118,000,000 on the Ravens -No more bids for 12 hours and then GIK gets his team, but only has $118,000,000 to spend on his total roster. A ****ter team like the Jaguars could then be won for like $130,000,000 and thus would have an additional $12,000,000 to work with compared to the Ravens. I think this makes sense for a couple reasons. 1.) Everyone gets the team they want the most 2.) It evens the playing field in terms of crappy teams getting more cap room to work with while the better teams getting less money to work with
I could see Todd bidding $60 million to get his team.........and then leaving at the first thing that doesn't go his way ;p
It's a solid idea, except I would still prefer if everyone had an even playing field regardless of talent. Just gatta be a badass GM and fix up a ****ty team. If anything, it would be fun trying to take over a crappy team and giving them an overhaul.
I truely believe u should randomize the gms then let them draft their own teams in order next year. Eliminates the lack of personal bias. Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
Reward you for not having a plan? Hell no. Drafts at a standstill...it will just stay there for a while ;p
I am not familiar with Seattle's team, but was surprised to see Boik pick Te'o with his last pick, though I think he's good value there.
