1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

A Big Reason the Packers Won Today

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by Dolphans Unite!, Oct 12, 2014.

  1. Dol-Fan Dupree

    Dol-Fan Dupree Tank? Who is Tank? I am Guy Incognito.

    40,533
    33,035
    113
    Dec 11, 2007
    If he wasn't a wussy he could have made that tackle in bounds.
     
  2. Kud_II

    Kud_II Realist Division

    3,662
    1,404
    113
    Oct 15, 2011
    Seneca, SC
    Nobody is arguing that Rodgers isn't an elite QB. This isn't news. He did what we expected him to do.

    The problem is we essentially aided him in beating us thanks to our inept coaching.

    And we can't very well ignore our first half offense either.
     
    Hiruma78 and ASOT like this.
  3. Dolphans Unite!

    Dolphans Unite! Banned

    553
    154
    0
    Aug 17, 2014
    We actually don't know that. Once again, it's entirely possible that alternative decisions made by the coaches could've had no effect, or could've made things worse.

    No argument there. I prefer to believe that the simplest explanation rules, and that's that we were attempting to compete with one of the best QBs of all time, with a QB who has never established himself as even adequate in the league. That's a losing proposition, and with the importance of the QB position in today's game, all other explanations for the game Sunday pale in comparison to that one.

    Go take a look at the stat lines for both Rodgers and Tannehill, note who performed better overall, and then consider what Rodgers did in the clutch. It isn't that complicated.

    Of course the "coaching decisions" explanation is going to be preferred, because it allows us to think we're better than we really are. It allows us to believe that we "could have won if only the coaches would've done X instead of Y." However, once again, we don't know that.

    What we do know is that we didn't have sufficient quarterback play to beat one of the all-time greats. Of course that explanation won't be preferred because it suggests that we still have a long, unpredictable way to go to become highly competitive as a team.
     
    DPlus47 and roy_miami like this.
  4. The_Dark_Knight

    The_Dark_Knight Defender of the Truth

    11,815
    10,319
    113
    Nov 24, 2007
    Rockledge, FL
    ASOT likes this.
  5. ASOT

    ASOT New Member

    4,870
    306
    0
    Mar 29, 2013
    Coral Gables, FL

    Agree 100% Brandon. We either have the most arrogant coach in the NFL, to give the ball back to Rogers with 2+ minutes or the most stupid. After watching him for 2+ seasons I think I know which one is closer to the truth.

    We're back at square one - we need a QB and a Head Coach, and we've wasted 3 more seasons of Cam Wake.
     
  6. Califin

    Califin Well-Known Member

    2,050
    403
    83
    Nov 26, 2007
    For Rodgers to have the ball within a one score margin of victory, with an adaquate measure of time to manage a game closing possession,
    is ultimately the weekly objective for GB's coaching staff, just as it would be for others around the league with similar talent at QB.

    Consequently, the goal of our coaching staff, along with nearly any other team facing such a prolific QB, was to disrupt the opponent's ability to achieve those conditions.
    Joe Philbin's approach in opting to allow the defense end the game, didn't interfere with GBs objective, but wholeheartedly embraced it.
     
  7. gunn34

    gunn34 I miss Don & Dan

    21,755
    3,475
    113
    Jan 5, 2008
    Oviedo FL
    This times 1,000
     
  8. Dolphans Unite!

    Dolphans Unite! Banned

    553
    154
    0
    Aug 17, 2014
    In 63 of the 93 starts Rodgers has made in the NFL, the Packers have beaten their opposing team by a margin greater than the 3 points they won by yesterday. That's 68%, or more than two-thirds of the time.

    Clearly the first task for a head coach facing the Packers is to defy the 68% likelihood that he'll be beaten in a fashion customary for the Packers during Rodgers's tenure, which is by a margin greater than we saw yesterday.

    The Dolphins not only did that, but they did it with a QB who's never established himself as consistently adequate in the league, and who finished the game with a sub-90 QB rating, to Rodgers's 100, including Rodgers's play in the clutch. I'd say that's a feat for the Dolphins, and I'd wonder who was responsible.
     
  9. jcliving

    jcliving Active Member

    361
    185
    43
    Aug 19, 2014
    I am not disappointed in this game. The team showed heart and played well. It was an entertaining and competitive game.
     
  10. Larryfinfan

    Larryfinfan 17-0...Priceless Club Member

    Metrics and stats aside, we lost because our DEFENSE gave up a game winning drive from a superior team...simple as that. It's not about what Tanny should have or Hartline or Wallace...gee, no one has talked about our once again putrid run game. The OL woes reared their ugly heads and our D gave up a game winning drive...it's pretty simple to see why we lost that game...
     
  11. Dolphans Unite!

    Dolphans Unite! Banned

    553
    154
    0
    Aug 17, 2014
    However, the defense caused a fumble on that last drive, and but for the random bounces of a football, the Dolphins would've won the game easily at that point. Credit the Dolphins' coaching staff for putting the team in a position in which the Packers win hinged on being the lucky recipients of a football bounce, following a fumble the Dolphins' defense caused.

    The Dolphins' coaching staff was right to believe that its defense could've won the game on that drive. Rodgers had been troubled by the Dolphins' pass rush all day, and he was again on that drive, to the tune of a near loss.
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2014
    DPlus47 and djphinfan like this.
  12. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,162
    5,057
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    Seriously, I thought we lost because they scored more points than us in the end, but this thread explains everything!
     
  13. roy_miami

    roy_miami Well-Known Member

    1,385
    560
    113
    Oct 11, 2013
    I give Finnegan credit for being smart enough to at least try to drag the guy in bounds, but he got outplayed, simple as that. The people saying he should have simply corralled the receiver to the middle of the field are being ridiculous, it goes against everything he's ever been taught and I don't believe I've ever seen a defender attempt such a thing.
     
  14. roy_miami

    roy_miami Well-Known Member

    1,385
    560
    113
    Oct 11, 2013
    OP is 100% correct and the stats back up what I saw with my eyes, which was one of the greatest QB'ing performances I've ever seen. I mean, did Rodgers throw a single errant pass? If the Packers would have lost their fans would have had reason to be outraged, you have the best QB in the league on one of his better days, you have a big advantage in time of possession and turnover margin and you lose with that? In fact, they were dependent on our crappy QB to not make a play in order to even have a chance at the victory.

    There were no obvious strategic mistakes by the coaches in the final three minutes, or over the entire game. Having several opportunities to win the game against a hall of fame QB playing at a hall of fame level is actually a great accomplishment.

    Everybody loves to second guess coaching decisions and I would bet there is a pretty significant percentage of fans both complaining about not passing it on third down yesterday and complaining that we didn't run it on the play against Buffalo that resulted in the sack/strip/turnover. If you are one of those people you should be ashamed of yourself.
     
  15. resnor

    resnor Derp Sherpa

    16,327
    9,874
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    New Hampshire
    What was Tannehill's rating in the second half? What are the metrics for winning if you look at only the second half? Point is, Tannehill played lights out in the second, and put the Dolphins in a position to win.
     
  16. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,162
    5,057
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    If he attempted that tackle I think he would have whiffed and the Packers score anyways. Our cornerbacks were that soft yesterday...
     
  17. DPlus47

    DPlus47 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    16,343
    4,501
    113
    Jul 14, 2008
    Do you stop watching most games before the last 2 minutes of each half?

    N.B. I'm not trying to be an ***, but it's pretty common strategy to keep a guy in bounds by any means necessary when the other team is up against the clock with no timeouts. It happens regularly, and anybody teaching otherwise gets results like the Dolphins got on Sunday on a regular basis.
     
  18. roy_miami

    roy_miami Well-Known Member

    1,385
    560
    113
    Oct 11, 2013
    I've never seen a defender not try to make a tackle but instead simply herd the receiver into the middle of the field. Never. And I watch a lot of games. Finnegan could have done a better job at making the tackle and keeping the guy in bounds but its absolutely ridiculous to say his job was simply to make sure that guy didn't get out of bounds. If that were true we could design a new fangled defensive scheme where we just put a whole bunch of DBs in a box around the sidelines and force them to throw it over the middle.
     
  19. finwin

    finwin Active Member

    943
    194
    43
    Apr 30, 2013
    Jamestown, NC
    After Phibin brushed off Coyle in the first half, Coyle ultimately sabataged Philbin. We were outscored 10-0 in the final 4 minutes and Rodgers had that unheard of WPA because our D and coaches got abused. It came to that because of our not converting a 1st and Goal on the 5 yard line into points, 2 stupid targets to Hartline who does zero fighting for the ball and 2 ints, the Defense zero turnovers, playcalling on offense and defense that would allow 10 pts in 4 minutes and the list of xxups goes on and on and will continue to go on and on with this head coach.
     
  20. DPlus47

    DPlus47 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    16,343
    4,501
    113
    Jul 14, 2008
    Innovative. We could solve our coaching problem right here. I was definitely suggesting that I had a new and powerful idea. Apparently, "protect the boundary" is a brand new concept and I just invented it.


    My point was, Finnegan didn't have to make a perfect tackle and he didn't have to worry about form. Once the guy caught the ball, Finnegan's job was to protect the sideline. According to you--and others--he was to view himself as the last line of defense? Get the guy down on the ground with a perfect tackle or else? Sometimes an imperfect tackle can serve the purpose of slowing a guy down or redirecting him.

    If a player is out there, particularly in zone coverage, he is always aware that he has teammates. Have you ever seen one defender hold a guy up while another defender strips the ball? Is defender A negligent in his duties? Should we form a defense where everybody just holds somebody up or can we agree that situations change what you do on the field?

    In Finnegan's situation, his first thought needs to be "keep him in bounds and the game is over." If his thought is "I need to make a perfect tackle or we're screwed," then he doesn't trust his teammates. Get in the guy's way and grab him. Start moving him away from the sideline. If you succeed and tackle him, the game is over. If you fail but at least slow the guy down, a teammate will be over to help you clean up in a second. If you whiff, people will be talking about it on message boards for days to come.

    Of all people on that defense, Finnegan seems to me like he'd be pretty good at getting in someone's way. Apparently, I was wrong.
     
  21. ElNino

    ElNino Well-Known Member

    1,535
    255
    83
    Aug 5, 2013
    Norfolk VA
    ...and there it is.
     
  22. roy_miami

    roy_miami Well-Known Member

    1,385
    560
    113
    Oct 11, 2013
    The way I saw it was he tried to tackle him in bounds, he tried to drag him down inside, the receiver simply outplayed him. It happens all the time in football, the defensive player tries to do something and the offensive player simply is able to out-hustle, out-duke, out-muscle the defender. That is what happened here. He tried to make the tackle, he did a poor job, it was poor form, hence the extra yards gained on the sideline, and that was probably all aided by the fake spike. It is what it is.

    People also need to keep in mind that Finnegan has the same dimensions as Grimes, almost exact, he just looks stronger for whatever reason.
     
  23. djphinfan

    djphinfan Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    111,648
    67,540
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    he did try to get outside containment for a brief second, but the offensive player had to much built up speed to overcome..finnegn messed up no matter how you slice it, it was the definition of how not to play in that situation, they should make a video.
     

Share This Page