1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Official WWE/TNA Wrestling Thread

Discussion in 'Other Sports Forum' started by alen1, Mar 25, 2008.

  1. weezybaby

    weezybaby Member

    80
    18
    8
    Mar 12, 2009
    Munich, Germany
    OMG, please let it happen just like that. I'd pretty much lose my self.
     
    SICK likes this.
  2. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    So about the PPV last night, it wasn't bad for a C level PPV. All the matches were solid to pretty damn good (Cena/Owens). I only have three issues with the PPV.

    1. I don't get the handling of The New Day. The WWE tried to force them down the fans' throats as faces and they were rejected hard, so they were turned heel and got super over and actually got heel heat and beat another super over tag team in Kidd/Cesaro so in typical WWE fashion they lose the titles immediately to a team know one cares about and they continue to lose.

    2. Kevin Owens tapping out. The way the WWE has handled Owens since his debut has been great up until last night. Sure he had a great match with Cena again but why have Owens tap out and make him another notch in Cena's belt, especially with the way Cole and company were telling the story of how Cena couldn't beat Owens and had those worried looks on his face etc. I've always said wins/losses don't matter if you put on a great match but this one rubbed me the wrong way for some reason. I'm sure Owens will be fine but don't get why he had to tap.

    3. The Undertaker's return. Sure it was a great moment and cool but my question is why? Why did The Undertaker wait a year and a half to get revenge on Brock? Is Undertaker a heel now because he attacked a face Brock? Hopefully the writing team has these answered and they're good. Because it really makes zero sense in kayfabe terms, especially since we have already seen Taker since his WM loss.

    I know people are excited Taker is back and all but I have zero interest seeing another Brock/Taker match but at least it will be interesting to see who will win since both guys need to be kept strong. I'm also glad Harper is back with Bray, I guess that means it's a Bray/Harper vs. Reigns/Ambrose match at Summer Slam, unless they stick Sting in there. The only other spots I can see Sting is Sting vs. Cena for the US title, Sting vs. Rollins for the WWE title or Sting vs. Owens.
     
    Vengeful Odin likes this.
  3. SICK

    SICK Lounge Moderator

    72,658
    35,312
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    Charlotte NC
    Someone worded the oddness of Taker perfectly:

    Brock beats Taker over a year ago, clean, fair and square.....he comes back, gets a win over Wyatt, disappears again, then shows up to "get revenge" ?? over a face, who beat you cleanly.....

    I think Taker doing his "last ride" arm movement at the end of the show last night obviously is signifying his "last ride" with the company......but is it also signifying maybe an American Badass heel return? I mean, Brock is face now.....it's just weird to me. Like you said Finkle, who wins this? They both need it.

    And now I am as lost as ever at who is going to face Rollins for the title, because two things are happening:

    Brock is caught up with Taker now.

    Rollins has no feud, he looked WEAKKKKKKKKKK last night as Champion, and Summer Slam is what, a month away? RAW will be interesting tonight, thats for damn sure.
     
  4. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    Yeah The Undertaker thing is just a scream for help by the WWE to pop ratings and to get people to watch Summer Slam. The story between Taker/Brock makes no sense and I honestly can't think of anything that would make it make sense. And yeah the WWE once again backed themselves into a corner because you can't have The Undertaker beat Brock and get his revenge because the WWE ended the streak to make Brock look like an unstoppable monster so when he finally does lose it will be meaningful and Taker can't really lose because you have to keep him strong for his retirement match. Honestly the only thing that would make sense is if someone like Sting costs Undertaker the match that would lead to their WM match but even then it would be "Brock needed help to win". Even thinking about this makes my head hurt.

    I don't have an issue with Rollins looking weak. He was facing Brock and is a chicken poop heel. The main issue with Rollins is ratings are in the crapper and he's getting blamed for it so now Brock/Taker will be the main sell of Summer Slam so whatever Rollins does is meaningless. There really isn't a challenger out there that makes sense that's why I'm thinking maybe it will be Sting. Otherwise you can have Owens beat Cena on RAW tonight and Cena could go on to face Rollins. I guess you can always just have Reigns move on to face Rollins too.

    Honestly I have a REALLY bad feeling that Kane is going to return as "The Demon Kane" and that's going to be the title match.

    Bottom line is the WWE is bottomed out because the storylines have simply been awful overall for almost 2 years now. Nothing makes sense. They continue with their 50/50 booking so no one can truly get over and when guys do they job them. I don't get any of it.
     
  5. SICK

    SICK Lounge Moderator

    72,658
    35,312
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    Charlotte NC
    And to top it all off last night, you have Ambrose and Cesaro not even on the card, when it ended at 10:40ish......I mean, RAW goes longer than that (it shouldnt, but it does)....why not have Cesaro and Ambrose fight for the interim IC title.....gives Ryback an immediate opponent when he heals, and makes the belt look good giving it a UFC type hype to it.
     
  6. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    You know, I was thinking about how guys like Ambrose and Cesaro weren't on the card and I'm actually fine with it, especially since it was a C level PPV and not a major one like WM, Summer Slam or the Rumble.

    I think one of the biggest problems with the WWE right now is overexposure. With 3 hours of RAW, 2 hours of Smackdown, an hour of Superstars and whatever other C level shows are on that's 6 plus hours a week of wrestling. It's good for guys not to be on every show wrestling or doing something all the time. That's the biggest reason why Brock is so special. Because he's not always on so when he is on TV it makes it feel important and special.

    It's good to give the guys a break everyone and awhile.
     
  7. Vengeful Odin

    Vengeful Odin Norse Mod

    21,837
    10,818
    113
    Dec 2, 2007
    Kansas City, MO
    My Battleground thoughts:

    • I actually really liked the Sheamus/Orton opener. I don't watch a lot of RAW these days so the match was probably more fresh to me than others. I'd give it *** and call it good.
    • Was disappointed in the way that they handled New Day. Xavier Woods is on another level these days at ringside. The match itself wasn't great, but hearing the words "Tricep Meat" on PPV was worth it. Probably ** here.
    • The Charlotte / Sasha / Brie match was fine. I'm disappointed at the way that Stephanie has to be the focal point of this "reboot," and the match itself was ... just okay. I'm not a fan of Brie at all, I just don't buy her as a credible worker in the ring, and I felt like she dragged the match down quite a bit. Feels like we are heading for a trios match at Summerslam, which I think could actually be really good. I'd go ** 1/4 on the match.
    • Bray vs. Roman was a somewhat methodical (and boring) match. Both of these guys are so damaged right now. A year ago this match could have headlined a PPV - now it's stuck somewhere in the middle. Having Harper come back is fine - I am hoping for Wyatt/Harper vs. Reigns/Ambrose at Summer Slam - the thought of Sting being involved does nothing for me. Right around ** 1/2 for the match itself.
    • Cena and Owens put on their usual awesome **** match, but I, like many others, have serious concerns with the finish of the match, with KO tapping out to the worst submission hold in wrestling. I get wanting to keep the US Title on Cena and continuing the Open Challenge, as it's consistently been one of the better parts of RAW, but man, I do not like the finish. They had a chance to establish Owens as another top level guy, and instead he joins Rusev and Wyatt back down in the midcard. Maybe Cena just hates fat guys.
    • Miz had a promo and stuff. Many liked it. I was kind of bored. And I guess the Big Show is a good guy again.
    • They really put themselves into a corner with Rollins and Lesnar. The match was fine - not much there to go by, but the ending was weird. This was the first time I looked at the Undertaker and saw someone really old - watching him struggle to get up after the Tombstones was a painful experience. I don't get where they are going with Lesnar vs. Undertaker - for many of the reasons already outlined in this thread, but I don't think they've thought that far ahead.

    I wanted to like this PPV, but too many screwy finishes (and messy booking decisions) hampered my enjoyment of it quite a bit. It felt like a slightly better version of Raw, with no 20 minute opening promo and less commercials. What's worse is that I felt like they were on a bit of a hot streak heading into this - the Cena angle has been enjoyable, and Brock has been fantastic. I don't know where they go from here. I came out of the PPV less hyped than I was going in, which is never a good thing.
     
    SICK likes this.
  8. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    Nice summary. I completely agree about Stephanie being a focal point and I'm sure if the Divas division finally takes off she'll take all the credit for it. Because everything great in wrestling is because of a McMahon and anything bad in wrestling is because another company/organization did it and if you don't believe it the WWE will show you countless docs on it on DVD or on the Network.

    I think the only way to keep Owens strong is to have him beat Cena tonight for the US title and then have a gimmick match at Summer Slam for the title to complete the "Best of 5" series. Otherwise it makes no sense and they basically just feed Cena another monster heel. Also Owens needs a big win back considering he's lost 3 big matches in a row (2 to Cena and 1 to Balor) and I'm assuming he's going to lose his match to Balor at the NXT PPV the night before SS.

    I thought the Undertaker looked old at WM30 so another year and a half isn't going to change my feelings on him. I just still don't get the point outside of trying to spike the ratings and buys.
     
    Vengeful Odin likes this.
  9. Section126

    Section126 We are better than you. Luxury Box

    47,525
    72,483
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    Miami, Florida
    The Cena-Owens match needed something I have been harping on for a while. The "third" out for a match. That match should have had a 60 minute time limit. Have them run out the time limit. A clean win either way, I don;t think...is/was a good idea. A title change between those two should "end" the feud. So save it for summer slam in a stip match (Cage? No DQ?).

    As for Brock...it is what it is. They add another attraction and keep their hateable whiny heel champ.

    AS for the rest of the matches....New Day is actually face now...so have them job in that spot? Don't get it.

    Brie dragged down Sasha (who is the next great diva) and Charlotte (who can be a great diva heel). Problem with both is that they position themselves as the best heels in the Diva division, and that makes the Bellas 2 heels too many. Bellas as faces are terrible. Lynch and Paige should be the new face underdog faction fighting through a sea of diva heels. That's how I would book it.
     
  10. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    Maybe not 60 minute draw but why not 30? I actually like that idea. For whatever reason the WWE never has time limit draws, that's more of a NWA/WCW thing. But it's something the WWE should bring back because it keeps both guys strong and continues the storyline/feud without someone having to lose.

    Nikki, unfortunately, isn't losing the title until she passes AJ Lee's Diva record because WWE is petty and if you're no longer with the company or left on bad terms you can't have any records.
     
    Section126 likes this.
  11. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    The plan for Sting is to have him in a tag match with Reigns against Bray and Harper at Summer Slam. If Rowan was healthy then Ambrose would have been added to the match to make it a 6 man tag. Right now Ambrose isn't expected to join but the WWE could add a new member to the Wyatts (Bo would make perfect sense for many reasons).

    If they don't include Ambrose in the tag team and Ambrose doesn't have anything to do at SS it will make zero sense, especially since the WWE has been playing up their "bromance" a lot recently.
     
    SICK likes this.
  12. Samphin

    Samphin Κακό σκυλί ψόφο δεν έχει

    Ray, not sure how you can say the story lines have been awful for two straight years, or that the WWE is stale when they have done nothing but put more young guys into their system, and new faces at the top of the card. The stories are hit and miss, but that has ALWAYS BEEN THE CASE. Unless of course, you enjoyed, Jean-Pierre LaFitte sealing Bret Hart's Jacket, or Mark Henry/Mae Young birthing a hand, and so on and so forth. The good outweighs the bad.

    John Cena as U.S. Champ has been the best thing to ever happen to that belt. EVER. Not just in WWE, but ever. And it isn't even close, as far as I am concerned. Kevin Owens tapping was probably a misstep, but honestly, I think he answers the U.S. Open Challenge for real soon, and wins the title on free television. Which allows Cena to move on to Rollins, which would be a perfect opponent for each other.

    Even if Owens doesn't take the title from John, I am okay with it. WWE has earned the right to be trusted with that story.

    The women's match from last night was incredibly well done. They had a bunch of time and did not disappoint. It is going to be interesting seeing that roster turn over. Who stays, who goes, etc.

    I was way more into the Reigns/Wyatt match than I thought I would be. extremely hard hitting affair. Stiff shots, good intensity and Bray actually won, even if by nefarious means. Great match. Having another round with those two (and whoever else in the match) is great.

    Undertaker coming back serves the purpose of getting Brock away from the World Title for awhile, so in that regard, it is a success. I am of the mindset that I no longer need to see Taker outside of WM, but if he wants to work some extra days, fine by me. I am wondering if this is less about getting revenge on Brock for the WM loss and more about retribution for Kane though. Afterall, that IS his story line little brother that Brock destroyed last week.

    As for Ambrose, Cesaro and the rest of the mid-card. Sumerslam is being built like Wrestlemania from everything I can see, so here is hoping they make it onto the show. Cesaro has earned it. As has Ambrose.

    And actually, a 6 man tag of Ambrose, Sting and Reigns sounds kind of intriguing to me. Sting's character about fighting for justice and all of that tends to coincide with the former Shield members' credo.
     
    SICK likes this.
  13. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    I can say that the story lines have been awful for 2 straight years because I've been watching it. The company has been so directionless, even when they have long term plans in place they either end up screwing it up or having a knee jerk reaction and changing things on the fly. The in ring product has more or less been fine but the story lines and writing hasn't been. The WWE doesn't even the fans any reasons to care about the wrestlers or their characters and when fans start to connect with them the WWE kills their heat. But hey if you don't have an issue with any of it more power to you.

    And of course even the best years or Eras in wrestling are going to have crap filled in, there's so much TV to fill each week it's just going to happen and is part of the business.

    EDIT: Case in point about the writing, The Undertaker's explanation for attacking Brock makes zero sense. Just a bunch of words and nonsense. Much like every Bray Wyatt promo for the past year. Stephanie is a heel but acts like a face in trying to jump start the Divas division. Same with Triple H, he flips between face and heel numerous times in the same show. The writing just isn't consistent, that's my big issue with the product nowadays. There's no story telling, no character development or growth. The 50/50 booking just kills everything.
     
  14. Section126

    Section126 We are better than you. Luxury Box

    47,525
    72,483
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    Miami, Florida
    This was a good show tonight.
     
    SICK likes this.
  15. DenverDolfan

    DenverDolfan Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    935
    388
    63
    Mar 13, 2009
    Lakewood CO
    As usual they bring out Heyman to try to make sense of their questionable booking (and as usual he pretty much pulls it off).
     
  16. SICK

    SICK Lounge Moderator

    72,658
    35,312
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    Charlotte NC
    Raw was amazing last night, loved almost every minute of it. Which is suppppppeeerrrr rare.
     
  17. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    Apparently The Undertaker's return did little to boost the ratings, RAW was up 2.8 from last week's 2.5.

    Also there's serious talk about Cena winning the WWE title at Summer Slam as Vince isn't happy with how Rollins acts as a heel, Vince feels like he doesn't carry himself as a legit champion and wants him to be an Edge like heel.
     
  18. Section126

    Section126 We are better than you. Luxury Box

    47,525
    72,483
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    Miami, Florida
    I think Rollins was told to be whiny and entitled, and then the WWE saw what that was. Didn't like it so much. I like him fine...but he MUST pin somebody or at least have him cheat to win some matches as champ.
     
  19. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    I really think J&J and Kane held him back a bit, plus I think the whole Authority stuff is well out played. But yeah I agree with you, nothing wrong with pulling he tights, putting your feet on the ropes, foreign object behind the refs back etc to get the pin and get more heat on him.
     
    SICK and Section126 like this.
  20. SICK

    SICK Lounge Moderator

    72,658
    35,312
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    Charlotte NC
    At least for once he wasnt a "hip" heel.....cool with the crowd. That stuff was never working.
     
  21. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    Yup. I hate the cool/hip heel 99.9% of the time. Triple H is the worst at it, really annoys me when he acts that way.
     
  22. SICK

    SICK Lounge Moderator

    72,658
    35,312
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    Charlotte NC
    Looks like Owens is being dropped from us title scene and is relegated to mid card duties with the rest of the guys vince doesnt wanna push because they "dont connect"...."arent cena"....."arent body builders"....."arent cena"

    etc etc
     
    Vengeful Odin likes this.
  23. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    I think a Cesaro/Owens feud would be awesome though. But yeah Owens doesn't seem like the type of guy Vince would want to push hard. They had something special with Owens but again the 50/50 booking that I was talking about in a previous post, they turned him into another wrestler.
     
  24. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    Looks like Hulk Hogan is no longer with the WWE anymore. The WWE took away his profile in the HOF, he's no longer listed as a judge for Tough Enough. Apparently Curtis Axel is no longer going to do the Axelmania gimmick. No word yet on why Hulk is gone, although there are rumors that there's some kind of audio tape of Hogan going on a racial tirade.
     
  25. Vengeful Odin

    Vengeful Odin Norse Mod

    21,837
    10,818
    113
    Dec 2, 2007
    Kansas City, MO
    I'm curious as to what would cause them to go with the nuclear option and essentially erase Hogan from history. Has to be something they consider serious.

    Really strange news to hear at the end of the week. Once again, the backstage machinations of WWE are more interesting than the product they are putting on TV.
     
  26. SICK

    SICK Lounge Moderator

    72,658
    35,312
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    Charlotte NC
    Man that's terrible news.....











    Curtis Axel had JUST perfected his white/blonde handlebar mustache.
     
  27. SICK

    SICK Lounge Moderator

    72,658
    35,312
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    Charlotte NC
    For the record I was board in my hotel room Tuesday night and watched Tough Enough. Holy **** what a ****ing HORRENDOUSLY ran show. Mics off, people talking over eachother, terrible "acting" on the show, horrible characters, just an overall **** show. And I know Ill sound like a "smark" but Y2J, Bryan and Paige were the only thing good about it. Big Show was cool guest appearing.....but one thing that stood out:

    Hogan seemed like an absolutey 100% grade A **** face. I mean just a huge A-Hole. Wearing his own ****ing shirt, talking **** on the guys trying, talking about how dudes broke his leg on purpose when he started in the business like these "plebs" didn't even deserve to stand in front of him. Man his twitter act is a joke, cause hes a terrible human.
     
  28. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    I'm sure more will come out today but from what I've read he did an interview in 2012 where he used bad words about African Americans, he apparently in another interview called The Rock a bad word and one of those National Enquirer magazines has a story coming out on Hogan "that he can't come back from".
     
  29. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    Yeah the new Tough Enough format is terrible. I think the WWE pitched it to USA as a mix between American Idol, the Amazing Race and reality TV but with the twist that it's live and the voting is instant. I really miss the old Tough Enoughs where you actually got to see them train instead of a random challenge and live stuff that's boring. Plus it's more of a popularity contest then "wrestling" show.

    I agree the only good thing about the show is Bryan and Paige.
     
  30. SICK

    SICK Lounge Moderator

    72,658
    35,312
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    Charlotte NC
    According to some sites, the plan originally was for Cena to do this open us challenge, and Bryan to do the same on Smackdown to elevate both titles and young talent for exposure. Then Cena and Bryan were to face off for a title unification? at Summerslam. Wouldve been really cool.
     
  31. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    Much rather see Cena as WWE Champion finally ending Rollins' reign and then have Sheamus come out to cash in only to lose to Cena in under a minute. Half kidding/half serious actually.
     
    SICK likes this.
  32. Jt0323

    Jt0323 Fins Up! Luxury Box

    12,967
    7,293
    113
    Dec 7, 2007
    Las Vegas
    Miz is great on Tough Talk, Tough talk is better than the show
     
  33. Silverphin

    Silverphin Well-Known Member

    11,035
    4,419
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
  34. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    I've heard that, maybe I will check it out one of these days.
     
  35. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    I kind of disagree with the article except for possibly Bray Wyatt.

    The Miz was World Champ and booked horribly, having to feud with Jerry Lawler, he was dead in the water right there and was a flop as Champion. And was directionless afterless, remember his face turn? I think you can say Miz overachieved and never should have been champion in the first place. Especially main eventing a WM. I always viewed him as a mid carder.

    You can argue Barrett should have gotten a win over Cena at Summer Slam that year in what 2010 but Barrett has been given multiple pushes since then but again the 50/50 booking has killed him more than the Cena stuff. He wins the IC title then never wins another match? He wins the KOTR crown and is jobbing to R-Truth on PPV kick off shows?

    Ziggler? I don't even get that one. What killed Ziggler was the WWE jobbing him to Del Rio coming back from his concussion once he finally cashed in his MiTB case. Fans were mega hot for him but the WWE just cut his legs out. The fans are still behind the guy but the WWE refuses to push him back in a main spot. I think Dolph is who he is now at this point.

    The Bray stuff I think you can blame on Cena possibly but again since his feud Bray has been completely directionless minus his feud with Ambrose, the WWE made the stupid decision to break up his stable and feed him to The Undertaker. Bray being on TV cutting random promos saying nothing also hurts him as I think he's overexposed and don't even get me started on him singing to the crowd and getting them to sing back, he's a heel.

    Rusev, I think it's way too early to tell. I don't think it mattered who Rusev feuded with because his gimmick was based on his undefeated streak and once he lost them the WWE decided to break him up with Lana for reasons. I've also questioned just how far he could go too, he just feels like an 80s "monster of the month" that they would have feud with Hogan for awhile. I think the WWE could have done a better job protecting Rusev, maybe not feeding him to Cena for 3 straight PPVs.

    Sandow? Haha, again more to do with the WWE writers giving him a MiTB case for no good reason then having him lose every single match afterwards. Sandow was never going to be a top guy.

    For whatever its worth, Stone Cold said on his podcast Cena going over Owens at Battleground was the correct call.

    Now if you want to talk about Triple H holding guys back/never recovering after feuding with him, we can talk for days about it....
     
  36. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    Summer Slam will be 4 hours this year. I think that's a good idea. The WWE should really try their hardest to make Summer Slam into WM Jr. and really make it meaningful.
     
    Section126 likes this.
  37. SICK

    SICK Lounge Moderator

    72,658
    35,312
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    Charlotte NC
    A night of "first time evers"


    plus


    lolcenawins
     
  38. Samphin

    Samphin Κακό σκυλί ψόφο δεν έχει

    That was a great main event. That superplex-rollthrough-Suplexslam (name escapes me at the moment) by Seth was incredible. And obviously, the nose breka made the match feel that much bigger. Big kudos to Cena for continuing after that gnarly injury.
     
  39. Ray Finkle

    Ray Finkle Member

    13,500
    4,315
    113
    Dec 9, 2007
    There are rumors that Adam Rose is going to join the Wyatt Family as Leo Krugger, his first NXT character.

    Also Sting might not appear at Summer Slam after all but if he does it will either be in a tag team match with Reigns and Ambrose vs. the Wyatts or with the actor that plays Green Arrow on "Arrow" vs. Stardust and The Miz.
     
  40. SICK

    SICK Lounge Moderator

    72,658
    35,312
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    Charlotte NC
    Sting was advertised on RAW for a meet and greet at SS.....so that may be all hes doing, but he will be in NY for it, that's for sure.

    And good for Adam Rose. He can really make it work as Leo Kruger with the Wyatts, that would be cool!
     

Share This Page