I love how mature this post is. Children should read it to know how to act on the internet. It will go down in history as the most mature post in history. You sir are a model of what it means to be an adult. Congratulations on your out adulting everyone on the internet.
What is your point? Because "every" QB has something they need to prove mean that we should forgive any one QBs flaws and chalk it up to "meh noone is perfect".... Some Qbs are better than others, some have proven more, none are perfect not even ARod.
I truly believe some posters on here will feel some odd vindication if Luck loses, and to them that makes them feel better than a hated rivals loss.
ANOTHER PICK??? I mean, I guess Luck was getting crushed, but that doesn't matter. The oline doesn't really affect how QBs play.
Lol Fin-O you say you understand what's going on, yet post things like the above, I don't know if it is you actually don't, or you are just trolling as is your way, or just repaying back the facetiousness in kind.
In all seriousness. Luck is not having a good game. I hope the defense can stop them so he can pull an awesome 4th quarterback back or something.
I hate the JETS more than any team, so I'll always root against them, but I can't forgive Indy for winning that Suck for Luck sweepstakes (felt deliberate too). So, I would actually feel some sense of gratification if Luck throws INT's/can't lead his team back.
Hmm did that post offend you?? I didnt mention your name?? Why so defensive?? Meanwhile....great forced fumble by Luck.
If you stood up for tanny half as badly you have done here for luck this thread would be much different. and it's not just you. A lot of guys in here have unfairly criticized tannehill while simultaneously championing other qbs that make the same mistakes
Great 3rd down conversion by Fitzpatrick....he's also 2-0. Guys like Luck and Tanny are irrelevant. Ryan Fitz is the fkin man
Not understand? wow, just holy freakin wow. LOL keep right on going, it's like watching a train wreck, Fin O has bee trying to lure you guys out of embarrassment, but to no avail, you think others don't understand what your doing, lol, we understand what your attempting to do, but it's really you guys that don't know what your doing. It's pretty amazing.
Finster is probably the guy who laughs at an inside joke he's not privy to, and when confronted, accuses others of them being the ones who don't understand the joke.
Btw, the more concerning thing is Jets and Bills have done this to Andrew Luck in two consecutive games...... Dolphins play them 4 times total with the same issues. I fear for Tannehill's life, Philbin's job, Suh's future victims, and the sanity of this site.
You don't have to stand up for anyone, just be objective and honest. Something many of you just can't do
BTW, Luck 18-34, 227 yards, 1 td, 3 ints, offense 7 total points. Defended by many. Ryan Tannehill, 30-44, 359 yards, 2 tds, offense 20 points, still criticized. Case closed.
It was inevitable .... but this thread was finally tipped into the abyss upon which it was intended. Fin-O they're goading you man. They're essentially going to continue harping on other QB's (who've EARNED the benefit of the doubt) in an attempt to marginalize issues perceived with Tannehill. It's almost pointless to continue carrying the discussion on.
Posters who can't admit their double standard, even when slapped across the face with it, are my favorite.
There is no double standard. There is body of work vs. body of work. It's what earns a player the right to be excused of certain "poor" performances.
Honestly they tried to pull the same BS with Aaron Rodgers last year...Aaron Damn Rodgers!! Again, go find a Sam Bradford or Matt Stafford to compare with so it can be a valid discussion we can try and have.