1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Interesting comments by Greg Jennings on Tannehill.

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by dolphin25, Jul 28, 2016.

  1. dolphin25

    dolphin25 Well-Known Member

    6,338
    2,400
    113
    Nov 22, 2014
    http://miami.cbslocal.com/2016/07/2...l-has-forced-confidence/?cid=twitter_CBSMIAMI

    Greg Jennings, who retired Monday after 10 NFL seasons, dropped by CBS Sports Radio on Wednesday to discuss numerous topics, including his former quarterbacks. He didn’t hold back, either.


    Jennings, who spent the majority of his career in Green Bay, played his final season with Ryan Tannehill in Miami. He thinks Tannehill has talent, but he’s not sure whether the 28-year-old Texas A&M product will ever get the most out of it.


    “I think that we will see,” Jennings said on Tiki and Tierney. “I don’t know. I believe that he has what it takes, but because his hands have been tied – because he hasn’t been able to really showcase who he is as a player because of the system or whatever the case may have been – this is his opportunity to take more of a responsibility and a role of, ‘I got this, guys. You can trust me. Coach, you can trust me. Give me more freedom so I can really show my teammates, and even myself, who I can be in this league.’ Because quite honestly, right now he thinks it, but it’s never happened, so no one knows.”


    Tannehill threw for a career-high 4,208 yards this past season to go along with 24 touchdowns and 12 interceptions. He hasn’t missed a game in his four-year career but has never finished better than 8-8.


    “He has the mindset of a guy who definitely wants to be great,” Jennings said. “I had the luxury of being in huddle with Brett (Favre), had the luxury of being in the huddle with Aaron (Rodgers). There’s a huge difference. There’s just a huge difference. It’s more of that ‘it’ factor. . . . I didn’t experience that in the huddle. Does he have confidence? Absolutely, 100 percent. But does it come off as almost forced, like, ‘I want to be able to do this?’ In my opinion, yes. Now, again, I think a lot of that had to deal with the fact that he wasn’t really able to be who he wanted to be. He was kind of forced to be this robot in this system. That was evident. That was felt. That was the vibe that you got when you were in the huddle, like, ‘Okay, we’re going to make this work.’ It’s just different. It’s a huge difference when you step into the huddle and a quarterback carries that presence of, ‘Look, it does not matter what the play is. I’m going to make it work.’”
     
    BuffaloDolphin, CWBIII, Bpk and 10 others like this.
  2. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    The bold actually explains the "why Thill didn't come across like a Rodgers in the huddle" aspect of this.

    i know, I know, that's just an excuse that his coaches forced him to be X.....sigh....
     
    resnor and Unlucky 13 like this.
  3. Linus

    Linus Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    2,407
    5,922
    113
    Jan 9, 2008
    I will take it with a grain of salt because while he was actually with the Packers he had sister doing tons of complaining about Rodgers by proxy, on Twitter...and then after leaving the Packers he had a bunch of stuff to say about Rodgers' "poor leadership."
     
    number21 and resnor like this.
  4. jdang307

    jdang307 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    39,159
    21,798
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    San Diego
    Favre and Rodgers are two of the cockiest sumbeaches in the game. Of course Tanny can't compare to that. Tanny is a pretty humble guy. There are many ways to be that killer in the huddle and on the field. Peyton never seemed that cocky but he carries an intensity about him. I don't think Tanny has either yet. He needs to, to lead the team. Maybe this year or next.
     
    ckparrothead, Fin-O and evz like this.
  5. dolphin25

    dolphin25 Well-Known Member

    6,338
    2,400
    113
    Nov 22, 2014
    The QB's you mentioned had the IT factor. I don't see that with Tannehill.

    That was the vibe that you got when you were in the huddle, like, ‘Okay, we’re going to make this work.’ It’s just different. It’s a huge difference when you step into the huddle and a quarterback carries that presence of, ‘Look, it does not matter what the play is. I’m going to make it work.’”


     
  6. resnor

    resnor Derp Sherpa

    16,329
    9,874
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    New Hampshire
    Ah...the famous "IT factor."

    That's where "clutch" comes from, also. It's great, you make up something that can't be seen, then state that Tannehill is missing it. Really solid analysis.
     
    RevRick, cuchulainn, number21 and 6 others like this.
  7. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    I hear Doughty doesn't have the "Squiggle Murphies". Which is why he went so late in the draft. All great QBs have the "Squiggle Murphies". You can't argue that.
     
    number21, SICK, jegol71 and 2 others like this.
  8. ckparrothead

    ckparrothead Draft Forum Moderator Luxury Box

    79,599
    159,162
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    I think what Jennings is saying is significant, though most fans will immediately dismiss or rationalize it, but you have a good point that those two are unusually cocky/arrogant. Then again as I think about it, so are guys like Peyton Manning, Tom Brady and Drew Brees. So that puts me back to maybe what he's saying has some significance to it. Tannehill clearly hasn't grown into that role yet. He's trying to but it does come off forced sometimes.
     
  9. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,162
    5,057
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    You can't be cocky if you don't know how to win.

    But anyways...

    I know the following facts.

    We now have the best offensive line unit since Sparano's first year, which was a really good one. We have talented running backs and receivers. So the offense as a whole is fixed, there are no glaring holes except maybe at RG. There are no excuses now, Tannehill will lead us to 12 wins and possibly division title, right? Because I've seen other quarterbacks do it with much less.
     
    dolphin25 and Finster like this.
  10. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    I think there's something to be said that its hard to be that cocky fighter pilot type of QB, when your forced to fly with a governor on the throttle.
     
  11. resnor

    resnor Derp Sherpa

    16,329
    9,874
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    New Hampshire
    And when your captain is trying to have you grounded because he's getting **** from the admiral, because his missions have been cluster****s.
     
  12. CitizenSnips

    CitizenSnips hmm.

    5,525
    4,219
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    PA
    You're overselling our skill players. Lots of potential, sure, but no sure things anywhere.

    Devante and Landry are both capable of greatness, butno ones afraid of them right now. Ajayi and Foster, if the two of them can even handle a 16 game season, are complete unknowns.

    I'm certainly hoping this Oline is great, but being a dolphins fan has taught me never to assume our moves work out.
     
    number21, LiferYank and Mcduffie81 like this.
  13. Brasfin

    Brasfin Well-Known Member

    2,435
    1,672
    113
    Apr 27, 2013
    Brazil
    Tannehill doesn't have that kind of personality, but I think he will develop more confidence as he gains more experience and becomes more successful. I think confidence and attitude is something that can start small and can snowball that way. Above all, Tannehill really needed the support of his HC and rest of coaching staff... now that he has it, I think we'll see more confidence and leadership.
     
    cuchulainn, Tin Indian and resnor like this.
  14. Tin Indian

    Tin Indian Rockin' The Bottom End Club Member

    7,929
    4,404
    113
    Feb 10, 2010
    Palm Bay Florida
    I am of the mind that he clearly is the best we've had at the position since Dan and 1 year of Pennington. All the guys that want to replace him always sound like there are great QB's falling off trees out there.
    I still believe that his biggest problem has been coaching and the insecurity Joe "Queasy" Philbin clearly has in himself. Now he has a coach that has his back, believes in him and has given him the freedom to play the
    game without shackles I am confident that he will show it on the field.

    For himself, he has to, because if he doesn't the team will move on next year.
     
    number21 likes this.
  15. dolphin25

    dolphin25 Well-Known Member

    6,338
    2,400
    113
    Nov 22, 2014
    How many great QB's have not had it? It seems to be very important for the position.
     
  16. Pauly

    Pauly Season Ticket Holder

    3,696
    3,743
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    Johnny Unitas. Drafted in the 9th round by the Steelers, not given any reps in practice and cut because he "wasn't smart enough to be an NFL quarterback". Goes to the Colts and Weeb Ewbank (Don Shula's mentor) and goes on to have pretty reasonable career.
     
  17. Finster

    Finster Finsterious Finologist

    3,087
    2,038
    113
    Jul 27, 2013
    What does that have to do with leadership?
     
  18. Brasfin

    Brasfin Well-Known Member

    2,435
    1,672
    113
    Apr 27, 2013
    Brazil
    Ben Roethlisberger doesn't come off as an arrogant, cocky guy to me. Neither does Eli Manning or the awesome Andrew Luck that so many Dolphins fans love. Yeah, these guys may not be great by your definition but, then again, we dont need Tannehill to be great to win a Super Bowl.
     
  19. jdang307

    jdang307 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    39,159
    21,798
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    San Diego
    I absolutely think what he says is significant. But Jennings mostly played with two HOF'ers, then Teddy, a rookie, finally Ryan. I think a QB needs to be the undisputed leader of their team.

    But Favre/Rodgers isn't the only way. Both are very cocky and arrogant, in different ways. Favre is cocky/arrogant but in a good hearted way. He thinks he can do anything and will try to, and is a bit selfish. Rodgers is petty, with thin skin. He has a chip on his shoulder, and he's still out there trying to prove everyone wrong. Rodgers is extremely petty.

    I see Brady/Peyton/Brees as uberconfident, but not cocky to the point it would rub their teammates the wrong way like Favre/Rodgers.
     
  20. jdang307

    jdang307 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    39,159
    21,798
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    San Diego
    You don't see that by Big Ben? I have a vastly different opinion.

    And mouth breather is excellent at times in the playoffs, but he's not great by any stretch of the imagination. You don't need Tanny to be great to win a Super Bowl, but how many did Marino win. How many has Tony Romo made it to. NFL history is littered with good QBs who didn't make the super bowl let alone win it all.

    As Peyton Manning can attest to, winning two superbowls off the back of his defense, even with a great QB it is hard to win the Super Bowl. With a good QB it's that much harder. It's okay if we all want our QB to be one of the admired ones.
     
    gunn34 and Finster like this.
  21. dolphin25

    dolphin25 Well-Known Member

    6,338
    2,400
    113
    Nov 22, 2014
    They all command the huddle. They have an IT factor that guys will follow.
     
  22. dolphin25

    dolphin25 Well-Known Member

    6,338
    2,400
    113
    Nov 22, 2014
    sorry, not sure what that has to do with the topic
     
  23. djphinfan

    djphinfan Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    111,652
    67,546
    113
    Dec 20, 2007
    The bad news is that all those guys your talking about after Marino and Pennington sucked ***.
     
  24. resnor

    resnor Derp Sherpa

    16,329
    9,874
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    New Hampshire
    Fiedler didn't suck ***.
     
  25. Colmax

    Colmax Well-Known Member

    5,126
    3,241
    113
    Dec 12, 2007
    All of the great ones know they are good. My perception is that Tannehill merely thinks he is good.

    There's a huge difference.

    I don't think it's for the lack of effort on Tannehill's part. It seems like more of an 'upstairs' thing. This year will be telling. I'm not a fan of how many coordinators he's gone through, but there is something to be said if every coordinator up to this point has "handcuffed" him. Why? These guys are pretty bright, too, regardless of Tannehill's production.

    I get the feeling that his classroom work is excellent. I also get the feeling that he's not quite processing things quite as quickly as we'd like when he goes into action. It's probably more just Tannehill getting in the way of himself. Again, not because of lack of effort, but by simply overthinking things. I have noticed on some occasion that he's getting better in some areas; such as finding an open man when the play sort of breaks down. Since he's been here, he has gotten better in several areas of subtlety in being an NFL QB. We've been waiting for the breakout season. I doubt that this year is it. What I do gather is that he will be markedly better in some very important areas. Statistically, I think he'll have a solid year, but what I want to see this year is a couple of fourth quarter comebacks where he sort of wills himself a win. If this happens, we may have something.
     
    Bpk and Finster like this.
  26. Pauly

    Pauly Season Ticket Holder

    3,696
    3,743
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    It just shows what a difference the faith a coach has in an individual can do
     
  27. cuchulainn

    cuchulainn Táin Bó Cúailnge Club Member

    23,698
    39,847
    113
    Sep 7, 2012
    Hattiesburg, MS
    Agree... and the NFL and SB's have been littered with similar stories throughout it's history. Steelers almost dumped Bradshaw early on. Plunkett was dumped by NE and led Oakland to a SB. Favre was run out of Atlanta and shined with Holmgren in GB.

    It's all about a coach connecting with a QB and having the faith in him to support him and make it work. Especially a guy like Tannehill, who has had the cards stacked against him since he's been here. I'm sure it's refreshing for him to have Gase backing him and working with both Gase and Christensen.
     
  28. rafael

    rafael Well-Known Member

    27,364
    31,261
    113
    Apr 6, 2008
    My understanding is that Sherman didn't handcuff. I actually felt that Sherman didn't protect him as much as his experience level should have dictated. So I don't think it's accurate to say every coordinator handcuffed him.
     
  29. P h i N s A N i T y

    P h i N s A N i T y My Porpoise in Life

    3,560
    968
    113
    Apr 19, 2012
    Treasure Coast, FL
    Eli? Andrew? Lmao..Aaron,Ben? Nope. Peyton, Brady before them ? Not exactly vocal leaders. The quality you look for in successful QBs is calm collectiveness. That's the "IT factor".
     
  30. P h i N s A N i T y

    P h i N s A N i T y My Porpoise in Life

    3,560
    968
    113
    Apr 19, 2012
    Treasure Coast, FL
    Gus Ferrotte was sufficient, better than Feidler perhaps.
     
  31. RevRick

    RevRick Long Haired Leaping Gnome Club Member

    7,191
    3,940
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    Thomasville, GA
    You are straining at gnats... This offensive line, backfield, and receiver set has not even played a down in a practice game ​with Tannehill under center. Why don't you sit and sharpen your axe (instead of just grinding it) until sometime during the season when any reasonable evaluation can be made.
     
  32. RevRick

    RevRick Long Haired Leaping Gnome Club Member

    7,191
    3,940
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    Thomasville, GA
    A saying from WWII when one could actually see the person in the other airplane in aerial combat: There are old pilots. There are bold pilots. There are no old, bold pilots.
     
    cuchulainn and Fin D like this.
  33. Colmax

    Colmax Well-Known Member

    5,126
    3,241
    113
    Dec 12, 2007
    Handcuff may be a tad hyperbolic, but early, he certainly kept Tannehill in the pocket (which was a good thing) when many fans were calling to move Tannehill around to use his athleticism more often. I actually sort remember discussing that this was good for Tannehill's long-term development. I do not recall if Tannehill had many (if any) opportunities to audible under Sherman. He may have, but being under Philbin, I don't recall that Tannehill had that freedom.

    I am actually not mad at Philbin in how he went on to develop Tannehill. Many here might be, but I think Philbin tried to develop him the right way. It just didn't come together quite as quickly as we'd like, and maybe Philbin sort of stunted him a little later on because the lack of confidence in Tannehill. Early on, I think they did the right thing for Tannehill's long-term development as a QB (too bad they couldn't keep the kid upright most of the time) and surrounded him with really solid talent, save for the O-line. Some of this is on Tannehill, too. Can't just blame the coaches.
     
    Finster likes this.
  34. cuchulainn

    cuchulainn Táin Bó Cúailnge Club Member

    23,698
    39,847
    113
    Sep 7, 2012
    Hattiesburg, MS
    Philbin was a OL and TE coach. He never developed a QB at any level of his career. Favre and Rodgers were coached by Clements and Bevell. IMO, once he was forced to fire Sherman, he handicapped Tannehill more than anything. Philbin always spoke about "scheme fit" and the QB executing the plays as designed. This while getting the shat kicked out of him by the worst starting guards and RT's (pre James) in the game.

    Tannehill plays pretty well when his starting LT, OC, and RT start and finish games, but that has been pretty rare the past 2 seasons.

    The OL matters a lot... Look at Big Ben from 2013... his season was very much Tannehill like when he was sacked 42 times.
     
  35. Colmax

    Colmax Well-Known Member

    5,126
    3,241
    113
    Dec 12, 2007
    I'm fairly certain that Philbin made a lot of decisions in how Tannehill was developed. You even said it yourself, he wanted the QB to execute the plays as designed. As for the nuances of being an NFL QB? You're probably right, that's not in Philbin's metaphorical "wheelhouse". But to suggest that Philbin did not try to develop Tannehill into a particular type of QB is probably inaccurate. I would say, at the very least, he directed the offensive staff as to what he wanted out of Tannehill. Philbin went on as far to say:

    Doesn't sound like a guy who is hands off in his QB's development. Hell, I wouldn't be either considering he was Philbin's first player and it was his first stint as HC. It only makes sense that he had a hand in Ryan's development.

    You point out Roethlisberger, but he has always extended plays that sometimes results in unnecessary hits/sacks. I think he's become better at being smarter when doing this, but he still does it. He had a span of four straight years with 40+ sacks (with one being 50). He's only had two years of less than 30 sacks, and both of those years, he only played in 12 games (one season being last year).

    I get what you are saying, but I simply disagree with you. Philbin was the HC, and while there may be some gray area as to who directly 'developed' Tannehill, there is zero doubt that Philbin had a big hand in the process. Even Stephen Ross sort of threw Philbin under the bus regarding Tannehill's development. Why wouldn't he? But that's another discussion altogether.
     
    Finster likes this.
  36. rafael

    rafael Well-Known Member

    27,364
    31,261
    113
    Apr 6, 2008
    I took "handcuff" in this context to mean that limited audible ability with the implication being that all the coaches saw some limitation in Tannehill's ability to handle that responsibility. I don't agree that this was the case.
     
  37. Colmax

    Colmax Well-Known Member

    5,126
    3,241
    113
    Dec 12, 2007
    I think this was the case at that point in time in Tannehill's career; they didn't trust him. They had their reasons.

    Do you not agree that these coaches saw Tannehill's limitations at that point in his career? Or do you disagree that not all of the coaches saw limitations? I suspect it was ultimately Philbin who saw Tannehill's "decision-making" as underwhelming and made that decision to limit his audibles (if he had any freedom to do so at all). It doesn't really matter what the other coaches thought because Philbin made the decisions. My thing is, early in Tannehill's career (first couple of years), I did not disagree with that decision.

    I guess the real question is: was Tannehill handcuffed or did he just not have the ability to make sound decisions in the heat of battle?
     
    Finster likes this.
  38. rafael

    rafael Well-Known Member

    27,364
    31,261
    113
    Apr 6, 2008
    No, IMO they should have seen more limitations early on in his career. Tannehill was given full field reads almost immediately and they would put him in third and long situations and throw him to the wolves. I see that as a mistake. As I said at the time, I liked what Seattle was doing with Wilson in that they gave him half field reads and a ton of TE heavy plays as those are easier passes. They protected him by calling run heavy games. Even in third and long they would call runs and just punt. They would limit his passing to situations with better win percentages. Early on they gave him one or two reads and then run instructions. Wilson came in with tons more experience and was far more NFL ready and his coaches still brought him along slowly. The Seattle coaches recognized the limitations present in every rookie QB while the Dolphin coaches failed to recognize those limitations.

    The issue with Philbin was that the offense had incredibly poor route combinations. Far too often there were no good options on the play or the windows were incredibly small. They failed to give Tannehill options to get out of those plays. That was how they handcuffed him. And that was in the Lazor offense from the beginning so it wasn't a situation where they tried it and Tannehill couldn't handle it so they took it away. Too often it wasn't that Tannehill lacked the ability to make sound decisions. It was that there were simply no good options. Fans see the offense sputter and blame it on the QB and the coaches shifted the blame that way as well. Lazor was a notorious control freak who wanted to control the play calling. Unfortunately, he would often end up very unbalanced and predictable. He took no responsibility for his failures and just said it was all the QB's fault.

    I don't see that as the real question (was Tannehill handcuffed or did he just not have the ability to make sound decisions in the heat of battle?) The issue is that we've had incredibly poor coaching that has put Tannehill in horrid situations throughout his entire time here. IMO the combination of poor protection, bad coaching and bad play calling, etc. has been one of if not the worst in the league these past four years. Despite that Tannehill has put up top half numbers and and shown top 10 or better skills. Those that look at just stats call him an average QB. Those that evaluate the QB's skills and consider the situation see a QB that has performed far better than his stats. So I see the real question as, "What will Tannehill produce given an even average situation?" Since he's already produced about top half numbers in horrid situations, I think it's likely that he's capable of being far better with an improved situation.
     
    resnor likes this.
  39. cbrad

    cbrad .

    10,659
    12,657
    113
    Dec 21, 2014
    So you're right that the stats say he's average (in the last 2 years), and of course you can add your own observations on top of that, though I'm not so sure about your claim that "those that evaluate the QB's skills and consider the situation" will all agree with you (lots of "experts" see Tannehill as average too you know..)

    But the "top half numbers" claim is a stat-based question and unless you cherry pick, he's average in terms of ranking (arguably overall a bit below average). Just so you know.. in 2015 among QB's that started at least 8 games, Tannehill is ranked #21 in passer rating, #21 in completion percentage, tied for #16-23 in Y/A, #9 in yards, #15 in TD's, tied for #21-23 in TD%, and tied for #10-17 for INT%:
    http://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2015/passing.htm

    If you had to summarize, Tannehill was (a bit) below average in efficiency, but above average in attempts.
     
    Finster likes this.
  40. jdang307

    jdang307 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    39,159
    21,798
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    San Diego
    You're just picking out one season of Ben's. 2006-2009 Ben was harassed more than anyone and they won a SB
     
    Finster likes this.

Share This Page