NIck Mangold

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by Finatik, Mar 6, 2017.

  1. Finatik

    Finatik Season Ticket Holder Staff Member Club Member

    5,348
    4,870
    113
    May 2, 2014
    SO Cal
    When the Jets released center Nick Mangold last month, Mangold released a statement saying that he looked forward to “seeing what the future holds.”

    One thing the future has reportedly brought is questions about whether he’d be willing to move to another position.

    Dan Graziano of ESPN.com reports that Mangold has heard from teams that are wondering if he would switch to guard. At this point, Mangold has rebuffed those thoughts in hopes of continuing to play a position he’s played well enough to be named to a pair of All-Pro first-teams since entering the league as a first-round pick in 2006.

    Mangold’s play hasn’t been at quite that level in the last few years, but he’s remained effective enough to think he’d be a good option for someone during the 2017 season. If that doesn’t materialize, however, Mangold may be learning some new tricks while acclimating to a new team.

    ME - With Pouncy a potential problem health wise every year, if he would move to guard would he be an option? That would give us a back up for center too.
     
  2. Unlucky 13

    Unlucky 13 Team Raheem Club Member

    57,391
    73,548
    113
    Apr 24, 2012
    Troy, Virginia
    I think that with the combination of his age (33), wear and tear (164 games over 11 seasons), declining play, and expected price tag, he's not a good fit for Miami in 2017. We do need a long term replacement for Pouncey, but we have Urbick as a backup to both OG and OC this season, and need two real guards to start. Younger guys, who will be around for a while. Not someone who we don't know that we can even count on for one season. If there's value to be had, I'm all for drafting a center from the 4th round on to groom.
     
    resnor and thetylernator like this.
  3. Pauly

    Pauly Season Ticket Holder

    3,722
    3,784
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    As unlucky said. If we replace Pouncey it has to be someone more reliable, and given Mangold's age and declining play Mangold isn't a candidate.
    Also we saw how effective Pouncey was at guard, so signing Mangold as a a G seems terribly risky to me. We could end up with 2 gimpy Cs who suck at playing G.
     
    Unlucky 13 likes this.
  4. MikeHoncho

    MikeHoncho -=| Censored |=-

    52,658
    25,575
    113
    Nov 13, 2009
    Yes please


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  5. ripper1961

    ripper1961 Active Member

    278
    205
    43
    Jan 13, 2014
    Too old.
     
  6. iamtiv

    iamtiv Active Member

    177
    84
    28
    Aug 22, 2013
    Urbik was getting ABUSED the last few games last year. That guy Flowers for NE made him his 'rhymes with itch'.
    If we don't get a legit starting guard in the door here 2017 is pissing in the wind.
     
  7. iamtiv

    iamtiv Active Member

    177
    84
    28
    Aug 22, 2013
    No, at this point, I don't see Larsen as a legit starting guard. He was 'depth' for the Bears and wound up having to start but people in Chicago adamantly said he sucked. He can't be our only NFL vet guard. We need a freakin' difference-maker (a Positive difference maker).
     
  8. phins18

    phins18 Active Member

    573
    185
    43
    Jan 8, 2017
    TJ lang needs to be added. We cannot count on drafting a stand out guard and having them be a difference maker in year one. the interior OL is desperately important. It being terrible completely ruins the consistency of the run game and when they suck in pass blocking it makes it so much harder on Tannehill when he is not able to step up in the pocket and is consistently being forced out.
     
  9. TheOne

    TheOne Active Member

    320
    150
    43
    Oct 14, 2016
    If The Dolphins manage to get TJ lang it will be the best off season in my lifetime.
     
  10. brandon27

    brandon27 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    46,220
    20,243
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    Ontairo, CANADA
    Mangold would be a good get if he agreed to play at guard.

    I just don't see this FO paying alot for guard play. They haven't in the past and likely won't now. I don't agree with that plan, but that's how it appears.

    Mangold would fit what seems to be their plan. Vet. Low risk. Low cost. And can also play C in Pouncey gets hurt again.

    It's a good plan. Stop gap, absolutely. But you can't spend big money everywhere. I'd have loved to at LG at least. But I just don't see them doing that now. It's going to be bargain guys, it one year prove it vet types Ong with some draft picks now as far as I can see.

    Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S5 using Tapatalk... ignore the typos!
     

Share This Page