The vast majority of NFL players continue to prefer playing on grass. Plenty of owners refuse to provide it. The league’s position becomes harder to justify when stadiums that use the fake stuff for football install grass for soccer. The World Club Cup Group Stage (whatever that means) happens this weekend at MetLife Stadium. Grass has been installed at the home of the Giants and Jets for the event. Via Alex Schiffer of FrontOfficeSports.com, the NFL Players Association noticed the photo and reacted. “Looks nice,” the union tweeted, along with this hashtag: "#SaferFields.” It’s not a new position for the union. Former NFLPA president JC Tretter has made the case for grass over turf. The league has said that the issue is more complicated. In our view, it’s simple. It’s about cost. If having a well-maintained grass field cost the same as having a synthetic field, every NFL stadium would have grass. The issue will become more pronounced next year, when multiple NFL stadiums install grass for the FIFA World Cup. Including MetLife Stadium, where the final will be held. With the NFL poised to push for 18 regular-season games (up from 17) and 16 international games (up from 10), the union has leverage. Whether that leverage can be converted into grass fields in all NFL venues remains to be seen.
Based on last season, the league's stadiums were split about 50/50 on real grass. This is actually an improvement from the 90s, when at one point 18/28 had artificial. I dream of a NFL where every team is like the Raiders, and has a natural grass field with a retractable roof.
For a league that counts their revenues in multi-billions, to cry about the cost of maintaining grass fields is beyond ludicrous.
That's because, weirdly, most billionaires try everything they can to cut down costs despite the fact that they could probably walk through Sawgrass Mills and clear out every story, booth, and stall and still have more money than most of the people in the world.
They could very easily raise additional funds by passing on costs to fans and/or giving another game or 2 to Amazon and getting Jeff Bezos to foot the bill for the grass, thereby protecting their precious margins. Personally, I vote for getting more $$ from Jeff, lol.
Very wealthy people generally do everything that the can not to spend their own money. In a better world, every pro sports franchise would be set up like the Packers.
After decades of players sustaining non-contact injuries on synthetic turf, you would think grass would be used as an insurance policy to protect them. Aaron Rodgers got hurt less than a minute into the season two years ago and they still pinch pennies. They'll spend a boat load of money on training staff and medical personnel but balk at paying more for grass. Make it make sense.
From a business perspective, yes. From a personal perspective, no. They spend ridiculously lavishly on themselves (yachts within yachts! Properties in 20 countries all staffed and manned 24/7/365! Art, art and more art! etc) while at the same time pinching every last penny they conceivably can when it comes to their businesses. This is definitely one of those penny pinching moments. For instance, apparently the Bengals turf is specially created for them - not for good quality, but for cheapness. It's just a total cheap clown organization.
There was a time a decade or so ago when I knew that the Bengals and WVU used the same odd kind. It wouldn't surprise me if it was because WVU was being cheap too. Officially, they both use FieldTurf, but there are different varients.
