1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Merged: Darren Mcfadden is a must....

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by minus, Dec 7, 2007.

  1. minus

    minus New Member

    12
    0
    0
    Dec 7, 2007
    I'm sorry to all you Brown fans out there. Ronnie will take two year to fully recover from the injury and on top of that he might not be same player. You just can't pass up on talent like Mcfadden.
     
  2. Zod

    Zod Ruler of the Universe

    3,415
    1,557
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    Is there someone out there that would actually root for Ronnie Brown rather than the Dolphins? Must be an Auburn Tigers fan instead.
     
  3. Nublar7

    Nublar7 Senior Member

    232
    61
    28
    Dec 4, 2007
    Pennsylvania
    McFadden could be the pick, but then again a talent like Dorsey may be too much to pass up. Our D-Line needs a lot of help, and Dorsey is an extreme talent at DT. Ronnie Brown is likely to be ready to go for next season, and should be close to his dominating self by 2009. Only problem with McFadden is that you now would have two of the top paid running backs in the NFL on the same team. Why not just go with Ronnie, Lorezno, Chatman, Ricky and draft someone in a later round?

    Dorsey may be the more logical move.
     
  4. mullingan

    mullingan New Grandbaby Pic!!!

    4,744
    733
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    Gainesboro, TN
    How many McFadden threads will we have before the draft. 1000 over or under. That should be the next poll.
     
  5. burger13

    burger13 New Member

    160
    36
    0
    Nov 26, 2007
    South Jersey
    ok...you've done the easy part and proclaimed McFadden a must have can't-miss prospect that the Dolphins have to draft.

    now please explain how the dolphins build a team with almost $60 million guaranteed tied up at halfback.
     
  6. Zod

    Zod Ruler of the Universe

    3,415
    1,557
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    He is not logical at all.

    If Dorsey is drafted by the Miami Dolphins, my new signature will be FIRE RANDY MUELLER.

    We take a quarterback.

    We take a receiver.

    We take an offensive tackle.

    We take a corner.

    We take a defensive end.

    We take anybody that helps stop the oppositions passing game or helps our passing game advance. We don't use the first pick in the draft to stop the run. We might use the 32 pick for that. We might use the 50 pick for that. We use the FIRST PICK IN THE DRAFT for the passing game.

    ........or Randy Mueller has no balls!
     
  7. resnor

    resnor Derp Sherpa

    16,329
    9,874
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    New Hampshire
    Why wouldn't we use the first pick to fill the biggest whole on our team? Teams have been constantly running the ball down our throats. If we stopped the run, we'd have a chance at keeping other teams from scoring, at the very least, from other teams controlling the clock. It's a pipe dream to think that they are going to draft a QB or a WR with any of the 1st or 2nd round picks. It seems like when we had a healthy Ronnie, we were doing pretty well on offense, and, once he went down, our offense really started to suck. Our o-line has been far better than our d-line, so, I'd expect them to draft for the D before they draft for the O.
     
  8. MiamiMan147

    MiamiMan147 Season Ticket Holder

    209
    69
    0
    Nov 26, 2007
    If you have a guy in the middle of your DL who can penetrate and requires double and triple teams, that helps you stop the pass.
     
  9. burger13

    burger13 New Member

    160
    36
    0
    Nov 26, 2007
    South Jersey
    You really don't seem to appreciate the importance of stopping the run.

    Here's a quick stat for you for this year, and I challenge you to find any other year where these numbers aren't similar.

    COMBINED WINNING % OF TEAMS IN TOP-10 IN RUSH D - 0.633
    COMBINED WINNING % OF TEAMS IN BOTTOM-10 RUSH D - 0.322

    Just for kicks...I did the the same for pass d

    COMBINED WINNING % OF TEAMS IN TOP-10 IN PASS D - 0.533
    COMBINED WINNING % OF TEAMS IN BOTTOM-10 PASS D - 0.521

    Looks like stopping the run is pretty important for winning football games. Good pass D seems to be hit or miss.

    For the Dolphins this year at 0-12....they rank #32 in rush defense and #3 in pass defense.
     
  10. Vertical Limit

    Vertical Limit Senior Member

    12,162
    5,057
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    Is there a way for me to donate money to finheaven for I can have access to the Vip forum? I'm tired of the same, stupid threads.

    I have paypal.
     
  11. Zod

    Zod Ruler of the Universe

    3,415
    1,557
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    Caution!



    We are all choosing Glenn Dorsey out of caution. I was doing it myself for the past couple of weeks. You look and you say -

    "We have never been in this position. Look at all the others that tried and failed."

    You do not want to pick a QB, WR, Corner, or DE/LB out of fear of failure. The fear of some talking head saying you picked this but you need this. All GM's whether they have failed or not say the same thing about this pick and a stud QB.

    "If you are position to draft a QB, you draft the QB. If you already have one - good now you have two for the time when the other goes down to injury........and he's going to go down to injury."

    Now you must say to yourself that there is not an NFL QB in this bunch. To that I say, "Okay, who is the next person that can help our passing game." It isn't Glenn Dorsey.

    This isn't any old pick people. Randy Mueller can pick any college football player in the country! General Managers are paid for this pick. Put your balls on the table!
     
  12. Zod

    Zod Ruler of the Universe

    3,415
    1,557
    113
    Nov 25, 2007

    No! No! I appreciate stopping the run. I just know what a dynamic passing game does to the defense that is "stopping the run." I don't need the statistics. I've seen them all. I saw them all when the Miami Dolphins were top ten in both categories for consecutive years........

    AND THEY STILL MISSED THE PLAYOFFS!


    Who was in the playoffs?

    Tom Brady
    Peyton Manning
    Trent Green
    Matt Hasselbeck
    Kurt Warner
    Brett Favre
    Ben Roethlisberger
    Drew Brees
    Donovan McNabb


    But you don't have to look at them and their rosters, stats, ect. The Miami Dolphins practically wrote the book on how to make the playoffs in today's NFL. It all started with Dan Marino. Have you not noticed that we have barely sniffed the playoffs since? And let me remind you that almost to the year - all of Dan Marino's defenses sucked!
     
  13. burger13

    burger13 New Member

    160
    36
    0
    Nov 26, 2007
    South Jersey
    So reach for a QB just because they are a QB? What seem to be the consensus top-3 players in college are NOT QB's!! Glen Dorsey, McFadden and Chris Long. Sure you can make arguments for othe guys, and what we think we know today likely won't matter by late April, but this is how it stands today. I want the BPA, but have a hard time figuring how we could make a McFadden pick work w/o a good trade offer for Ronnie, which is very unlikely because of his injury. So for me, it's who's the best player between Dorsey or Long. Pick that guy.

    And as for your list of QB's....only 3 were first round picks. 4 were 5th round or later or undrafted.

    Yes we need a good quarterback.....no we don't need to reach with the 1st pick to get one.
     
  14. burger13

    burger13 New Member

    160
    36
    0
    Nov 26, 2007
    South Jersey
    and he should pick the BEST one!! Not the one who fits a need as you describe it.
     
  15. Zod

    Zod Ruler of the Universe

    3,415
    1,557
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    I never suggested we reach. Here is the thing that happens every year. These draft sites and magazines all do the same thing. They linger a couple of QB's in their top thirty. Some of them fall and some of them rise. It happens every year.

    What they really waiting on is the combine. They are waiting to see what comes out at the combine. If the QB's make all the throws accurately (which they will) they will all of sudden move up to the draftniks top ten. I chalk it up to the draftniks are finally getting information from a source. Maybe the scouts are making a few extra bucks at that point. I don't think the draftniks know a damn thing about scouting. Scouting is a trait that very few in professional football are good at. That is Bill Arnspargers observation - not mine. You either have it or you don't he said.

    But you wait and see.... At least two of these QBs will be rated top ten picks in all the magazines and they will fall off the board in the top five to someone. Is it a gamble? Why hell yes. That is why I said (it was really Charlie Casserly) "general managers are paid to make this pick." It is where they show their worth.

    We better all think about the position the Miami Dolphins are in. They are in a position to make a substantial difference in the franchise for the next decade. I guess I'm just trying to curb the enthusiasm for the "safe pick". I don't want to hear any more booing when Randy Mueller drafts another playmaker.
     
  16. shaunm000

    shaunm000 Well-Known Member

    747
    649
    93
    Nov 25, 2007
    Oviedo
    The Patsies picking #2 scares me though.... Imagine if they got MCfadden? OMG, just kill me!
     
  17. TiP54

    TiP54 Bad Reputation

    10,688
    4,955
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    Live from the Internet.
    Lets see...
    Draft McFadden who will ask for a fatter contract than Dorsey, and will complete Ronnie who led the league in total yards and chattman, who did a decent job backing him, just to eat cap space.
    Or pick Dorsey..who will will in Traylor's spot who is retiring after this season indefinitely.
     
  18. NJFINSFAN1

    NJFINSFAN1 Premium Member Luxury Box

    17,358
    9,641
    113
    Nov 24, 2007
    Northwest New Jersey
    Can Macfadden play defense??? If not, no thanks
     
  19. VanDolPhan

    VanDolPhan Club member Club Member

    13,057
    8,875
    113
    Nov 26, 2007
    Hamilton, Ontario Canada
    The hilarious part is the top players right now half the time aren't the top players come draft day.

    McFadden will not be the pick at #1. The only certainty in life beyond death and taxes.
     
  20. NJFINSFAN1

    NJFINSFAN1 Premium Member Luxury Box

    17,358
    9,641
    113
    Nov 24, 2007
    Northwest New Jersey
    1. Miami Dolphins - Glenn Dorsey, DT, LSU
    There are some, both in the media and in the general fan base, who are of the opinion that Arkansas RB Darren McFadden is a lock to be the #1 pick in the draft. With all due respect to those people, that would actually be quite unlikely unless the Dolphins trade the #1 pick, barring problems with Ronnie Brown recovering from his torn ACL. Brown has two years remaining on his contract.
    Dorsey, who just won the 2007 Bronko Nagurski Trophy (beating out last year's winner, Ohio State LB James Laurinaitis), is a phenomenal talent. And the reality is that, for the Dolphins, stopping the run has been a huge problem this year. A player like Dorsey would be able to start immediately and have an instant impact in the middle. He is an elite player who has suffered through back and knee injuries and had the guts to remain on the field for LSU down the stretch.

    http://www.draftking.com/nfl/2008/mockdraft.shtml
     
  21. Carabinieri44

    Carabinieri44 New Member

    292
    3
    0
    Dec 1, 2007
    guys listen, i said it before, but that one dude, unifiedtheory said it perfectly...with Ronnie Brown contract, there is no way we draft Darren McFadden, u just cant have 2 backs on your team making a large sum of money.

    its kinda like the Redskins with Jason Campbell, and Mark Brunell is the 3rd stringer, and hes making A LOT (for a third stringer, woooo).....u just cant do that. we have Jesse Chatman and Ricky Williams, just live with them!


    another guy said u can find good DT talent in the later rounds....seriously all u need is a 6'4, 330 pound guy in the 4th round and make him explode. no need to draft Dorsey at #1 when u can get someone bigger later.

    with that, i like Chris Long. hes amazing against the pass AND run. is he worth the #1 overall? doubt it.
     
  22. kadiddlehopper

    kadiddlehopper Senior Member

    179
    10
    0
    Nov 25, 2007
    we're too far away to taking a rb now.
     
  23. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Ahh Zod "get's it".

    A QB may be a waste though Zod, in all seriousness, not because Brohm and Ryan and even Brenan are scrubs, it's more because we are going young on the Oline next season (that is my opinion) and it is much easier to run block then to pass block.

    Of course that means that Mr. Beck is going to get creamed, but those are the growing pains of a young team.

    We have 6 picks and FA to shore up the defense, and only one #1 overall pick, we should take the player who has the ability to score from anywhere on the field at #1, then use the rest of the draft to shore up the "D".

    The offense is as bad as the defense, why the defense is such a priority when we have a better chance of having the offense functioning first is to me, a desire to return to "wanny ball" circa 2002.

    And BTW, if the price tag for McFadden is "too high" then do tell how anyone can seriously contemplate paying Samuals or Trufant 80 million?

    Can they score?
     
  24. #1dolphinsfan

    #1dolphinsfan New Member

    1,664
    189
    0
    Nov 23, 2007
    I wouldnt take Mcfadden i think that Brown will come back a great player the same he was this year he got hurt early enough in the season that he will be back in time for the start of next season
     
  25. #1dolphinsfan

    #1dolphinsfan New Member

    1,664
    189
    0
    Nov 23, 2007
    i think if we took a RB in the first round it would be a mistake there are alot of really good backs in this draft and we need more things then a RB
     
  26. oodolphins

    oodolphins New Member

    1
    0
    0
    Dec 7, 2007


    I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU. :up:
     
  27. sports24/7

    sports24/7 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    32,925
    41,463
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    That's why you aren't a GM. We have a QB, there isn't a WR nearly worth taking a 1, nor a corner, and despite what some people think Jake Long is a RT and a RT should not be taken #1. I won't argue against taking Chris Long who is a DE, but Glenn Dorsey is a stud, once in a decade type DT. Why not take someone who can stop the run. Last time I checked that was this team's greatest weakness. You can start the Fire Mueller chants all you want, but many good GMs would take Dorsey in Miami's position if they couldn't trade down. It's not a sexy pick, but he is the best player available at a position we need.

    As far as the argument against Ronnie Brown I don't get it. Where does it say that an ACL takes 2 years to heal? Braylon Edwards seemed to do pretty ok with his.
     
  28. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Maybe, think of our Defense as a bucket with 14 holes in it, Dorsey can only plug one of those holes.

    Think of our offense as a bucket with 5 holes in it, Mcfadden can plug one of those holes, leaving us with a need at TE, RT (maybe) and LG (Hadnot may go bye bye).

    McFadden would help the offense much more then Dorsey could help the defense because the "D" is just so beaten down right now.

    We have 7 picks or so in the draft, plus compensation picks and maybe a trade of JT, we can use those to shore up the "D", and still take McFadden.
     
  29. Bonedoc7777

    Bonedoc7777 New Member

    324
    4
    0
    Dec 2, 2007
    you need production out of the first pick in the draft, mcfadden will score points, dorsey was hurt this year,
     
  30. sweeper

    sweeper New Member

    319
    7
    0
    Nov 26, 2007
    ya but if our offense can't stay on the field even dorsey can't help this team out on D. whats the pt if we go 3 and out on every play and our D is always on the field. we need to moev the chains...
     
  31. sweeper

    sweeper New Member

    319
    7
    0
    Nov 26, 2007

    very well said. Also rem this. if McFad is the pick, Ronnie is most likely getting traded.

    We get trufant in FA, go McFad in round 1, trade RB to lest say a team in the mid to high 20's in need of a RB, use that get Hardy now u got 2 playmakers in which we need in 2 huge holes, make it 3 with the CB in FA, use the 32nd pick on Otah got a RT, get a G in FA ( LIke Lilja), use the SD pick we1 have on a TE or MLB, the 3rd on Steltz, and the 4th on a DE since solai is still in the wings, then the possiblity of JT being traded for a 2nd or a 3rd n get a CB.
     
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2007
  32. Pauly

    Pauly Season Ticket Holder

    3,696
    3,743
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    The only reason for us to take McFadden with the #1 overall is if he's going to be the second coming of Jim Brown. you can get good to very good RBs later in the draft and Ronnie has shown enough for us to tab him as a keeper.

    Let's look at what we have on our roster and work out where we go from there.
    We have:
    RB of the future (Ronnie Brown)
    WR of the future (Ted Ginn jr)
    QB of the future (John Beck)
    LT of the future (Vernon Carey)
    DE of the past (Jason Taylor)
    CBs of the OK for now.

    I'm not saying all the offensive players will turn into HoFers, but simply that we already have significant investments in terms of draft picks and salary in those areas. In which case the logical reasons for investing the #1 overall into one of those offensive positions will be:
    1) Can't miss HoFer available to draft
    2) The player we have is a bust.
    My reading of the situation is that we can't say that either condition applies to the offensive positions, in which case we turn to the defensive side of the ball.

    No one is suggesting that there's a Deion Sanders out there worthy of the #1 overall which pretty well puts us to the DL and the argument is between Long and Dorsey.

    I think it's fair to say that Dorsey is the better player and that Long is the type of player thats harder to find. Valid arguments can be raised for both players. But if you got in a time machine and sent yourself back to 1969 by your logic you'd draft Bill Stanfill (top DE) over Joe Greene (top DT). Nothing wrong about drafting Bill, but only the most diehard phinphanatics would suggest that Bill was a pickup than Joe Greene.
     
  33. NaboCane

    NaboCane Banned

    31,949
    11,899
    0
    Nov 24, 2007
    ronnie is the best example of the reason why a team with as many needs as the dolphins should never take a rb that high, unless he is as sure a thing as adrian peterson...and look at where even peterson is now.

    i love ronnie - love the kid. i think he is a bona fide top-10 back, if not top-five. but there are two massive cautions to taking any rb in the top three;
    1. they get money just short of quarterbacks and left tackles at the same position...
    2. and when they aren't there - as running backs often aren't, due to injuries - you have nothing comparable to fit in that slot on your team. unless you are mike shanahan. is anyone on the dolphins mike shanahan? show of hands...? no, didn't think so.
    why focus this particular spotlight on rb's and not, say...qb, lt, de, nt, etc?

    because rb is a position with a short lifespan to begin with.

    working just off the top of my head, i believe they have the shortest career span of any position. and that's only the average.

    rb's are injured far too often and far too seriously in comparison to other key positions. and by key positions i mean value positions, those that you would not hesitate to pick in the top five of any draft.

    even when their injuries do not end their careers, the typical injuries which rb's suffer are severe and debilitating in the long term, well past the point at which they are cleared to return to the roster.

    if you believe that these facts - and they are facts - constitute a sufficient basis for "reasonable doubt" when it comes to drafting a rb top-three, then it is a caution that you ignore at your own risk as an nfl gm; the risk of your team's future, and the future of your own job.

    again, though - nothing exists in a vacuum. you look at each scenario on its specific merits and make decisions...judgment calls which probably no two gm's make in exactly the same way.

    here's one way in which this process of reasoning might occur:
    1. consider the player's position value;
    2. consider the grade of the player relative to his position;
    3. project the player's compensation based on past contracts for players chosen in the same, or a similar draft spot...take into account not only dollars, but the impact of the player's contract on the salary cap in various scenarios, including those on the dark side of the spectrum, such as if the player suffers a career-ending injury;
    4. weigh that against both the average durability of the player's position, and the percentage of incidence of bust for that position at the top of the draft. consider the effect on a rebuilding team of the contract's cap number acceleration in this dark-side scenario;
    5. don't forget to factor in the individual's injury history and how it might or might not pertain to projected durability in the pro game, against bigger, faster players who all hit as hard as the hardest hitters in college;
    6. now...perform the same analysis of any player which you believe might be available with your valuable top-three pick...the near-certainty of the first overall pick makes this relatively simple in terms of covering bases;
    7. weigh your conclusions regarding each player you have considered, based on the aforementioned factors...
    8. ...and?
    to conclude, here's one consideration specific to mcfadden, and a global one:

    mcfadden suffered a broken toe in college. yes, it was an injury sustained in a bar fight. nonetheless, the injury required surgery. the injury occurred in mcfadden's sophomore season at arkansas.

    a stretch? sure. but it's not unheard of for a toe injury to end a player's career, even less so that it can limit a player's effectiveness without being career-threatening.

    and there is an element of uncertainty, however minor, that the injury and even the surgery to repair the damage might end up having a long-term degenerative effect on the foot.

    if they're your millions, as the owner of the team wouldn't you want to consider this before handing this young man about $25,000,000 in GUARANTEED cash?

    if you're the gm, would you want your team owner looking at you sideways until one day he fired you because it was your decision to ignore that consideration?

    and then, the global consideration is a simple question: what running back has ever taken his team to a super bowl win on his legs?

    there's my final answer.
     
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2007
  34. sports24/7

    sports24/7 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    32,925
    41,463
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    The problem is McFadden would try and plug a hole that is already being filled by Ronnie Brown. Hence, it isn't a hole. Dorsey may only plug one hole, but he is good enough where it would seem like he is plugging two. There won't be a quick fix with this team though. We shouldn't just ignore the defense because there is less to do on offense. This pick should not be made from a perspective of immediate needs. This needs to be a pick that makes the biggest long term impact and with a great back in Ronnie Brown, taking a stud DT does that.
     
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2007
  35. Awsi Dooger

    Awsi Dooger New Member

    111
    1
    0
    Nov 26, 2007
    You don't want to use gross passing yards to measure pass offense or pass defense. YPPA is much more relevant. And Miami darn sure isn't #3 in defensive YPPA. We're right at the bottom of the league.

    The best stat is Adjusted Yards Per Pass Attempt, which also includes INTs. Not many places list that stat but you can find it if you search hard enough. An INT is worth about 45 yards on average.
     
  36. padre31

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    NaboCane wrote:

    And yet, if we try to use Mcfadden's toe injury as a reason not to draft him, what does that say about Ronnie Browns injuries?

    With McFadden, we would see no drop off at the RB position, which can only help our Offense improve, and keep our Defense on the sidelines.

    Or, we can apply the same thought to Dorsey, a broken toe two years ago vs Dorsey's various injuries this season, DT is a position guaranteed to experience violent contact every play, would that also mean that Doresy is or should be out of consideration?

    And it should be pointed out, that if "it's important to stop the run" then should we not become more proficient at running the ball? A running game, only makes the QB's job easier, which improves the offense, the unit that we have invested the most in over the past three years.

    Dorsey on the other hand, only offers what he offers, a single DT who does not catch, block, run, or throw the football.

    BTW, Nabocane, Reggie White ran 4.6's coming out of the USFL, there is footage of White running with Albert Lewis in a 40 yd dash, and White kept up with him step for step. (pro bowl, 1988 or so)

    Glenn Dorsey isn't the next Reggie White, he isn't even Jerome Brown, he doesn't have that kind of speed.
     
  37. FINintheMOON

    FINintheMOON Moderator Luxury Box

    1,629
    786
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Catharpin, Va
    Guys... I am fairly certain that this is a non-arguement... We will trade down if I know Mueller as well as I think I do... The question then becomes what teams are in need of a top RB, DT or DE? What teams are out there that could make a run at the playoffs or the title with one of those players?

    Look at those scenarios and you will find out where we end up... Some say the Cowboys... They will definitely make post season this year and are the favorite for the SB... If they lose or don't make it to the big game, I am willing to bet that they will be 1 of the teams that will entertain a trade for the #1 pick... I would even say they would give their #1 and #2 at a minimum, and possibly a trade as well...

    But that is just 1 scenario... There are others out there. Anyone in the top 5, as far as rookies go in this draft, will be temptations for those teams in need...
     
  38. Kudda

    Kudda Banned Troll

    91
    4
    0
    Dec 1, 2007
    Bet the Saints said the same thing about Reggie Bush.

    Need over greed.
     
  39. unifiedtheory

    unifiedtheory Sub Pending Luxury Box

    12,363
    7,091
    113
    Nov 24, 2007
    Burnaby, BC, Canada
    You don't pass on a potential All Pro defensive lineman for a potential All Pro running back...ever.
     
  40. NaboCane

    NaboCane Banned

    31,949
    11,899
    0
    Nov 24, 2007
    the ronnie brown argument is disingenuous at best. he never suffered an injury until now. and it's injury, singular.

    and to take one point from the body of my post and try to discredit the entire thought process involved is as erroneous as assuming that by deciding that mcfadden shouldn't be our pick, i want dorsey. i don't.

    dorsey is patently undersized for the nose in a 3-4, and it is more likely than not that his frame is closer to being maxed out than that he might be able to put on weight and remain effective.

    he might project as a defensive end in that alignment. he is far more suited to a dt role in a 4-3, and the world simply isn't moving in that direction.

    dorsey is a monster in college, but his game is largely built on power and strength; he will not find that an advantage in the pro's. which makes his success at the next level subject to his being able to learn and use technique rather than try to muscle guys as strong as he is...especially given his weight disadvantage.
     

Share This Page