Ireland will not draft Tannehill at 8. It goes against how he drafts. Chances are he will draft safe/trade down.

 

Your saying our team is basically already set entering the draft? yeahhh.....

 

Maybe you missed the fact that we went 6-10 last year

 

The thing is Tannehill is a huge reach at 8. There isn't a huge gap in talent when your talking about Tannehill, Weeden, and Foles. I'd rather take BPA at 8 and draft Weeden in round 2.

 

we don't have a WANT at or LE spot, its a NEED. we don't have a WANT at WR spot, its a NEED. Same can go for the right side of the line, we can't put the house on Jerry and Murtha at this point.

I believe coaching will make a difference but your post seems like your forgetting that we only won 6 games last year.

 

yeah a stud at #8 and Weeden in the 2nd would be awesome

 

I hate to say it but I think Ireland will play it safe and take DeCastro at 8. His first goal is to trade down and if that fails he will play it safe.

 

Trade down and get another second.

1) Fleener
2) WR (BPA)
2) RT/DE (BPA)
3) Osweiler
3) DE/RT (Whichever you didn't take in 2nd)
4) Tommy Streeter

My draft. The BPA just means BPA at the position listed. Also Buckeye if we take DeCastro I'll actually be thrilled. In my opinion he's a hall of fame talent. Usually I would never justify taking a guard that high but in my opinion an elite guard can completely change your offense in the passing AND running game.

 

Yeah would be boring, but we would be establishing an elite offensive line. Think about that though 5 drafts and Ireland takes 3 OLineman that's pretty nuts, some people will flip.

 

Yeah their is definitely talent on this roster but to say we don't have any needs entering the draft is senile.

 

7 QBs. Can't miss.

 

Yeah but it fits what Ireland does. Trade down or takes the safest pick.

Defensively were pretty set from maybe a few needs but the offense is a mess IMO. Not rebuilding but far from being a playoff contender.

 

Sorry but you're delusional
We have the WORST wide receiver group in the NFL
Our #1 wide receiver has 1 td in the past 26 games...No cause for concern here????

4 TDS all season for the group of wide receivers you have
News flash...teams don't win when the core base of wide
receivers have 4 tds between them.

Yeah were set on the offensive line with giving up 52 sacks last season

Garner has started 9 games in 3 years
Murtha has started 4 games in 3 years
Carey isn't even on the team
Jerry is ????? He has 1 good game versus Buffalo and
people around here have him going to Canton

Be lucky if were 6-10 next season unless we draft 8 all pro players

 

There is no stand out talent at Qb, Safety, Wr, or at RT. RG could also use an upgrade.


The skill positions are?

We're not *****ing, or moaning! What most people are doing is pretty clear. Pretty clear that they watched the Dolphins go 6-10, and realizing that the HC and Qb were only a part of the problem.

What you're doing is well.....dreaming comes to mind!

 

If Tannehill is gone by the time we pick at #8, then it is too late to trade up and get him.

 

:lol:

 

oh snap!!!

 

Exactly, if he's not there at #8 Then trade up and get him? That would be a great trick.

 

How can you say that with any confidence?

 

I don't know what makes you think were going to reach for Tannehill at 8 when it goes against every Ireland does in round 1.

 

Maybe it's just me and with all due respect, but this thread is taking something simple and making it difficult while talking about something difficult and attempting to make it simple.

 

Usually 3 out of 5 is good. Not when it comes to your offensive line in the NFL though. That right side would get its *** handed to it on a silver platter every game.

 

If you think we're set at WR with Gates, Hartline, Bess and Wallace.....well, I don't know what to tell you.
We have one of the 3-4 worst WR corps in the league. I would hope it gets addressed in the draft

 

Delorean, bro.

 

How can you truly believe that? Our line was AWFUL last season. Your just listing 3 of the starters and 2 back ups who couldn't beat the other 2 starters out. hmmmm....yea great makings.

 

I thought he wrote "excellent LOLine". At least Moore will get a chance to see the rush coming head on from the right.

 

Hmm, imo Jerry looked fine at LT late last yr, no reason to think he can't play RT then.

Big Jake was nicked up, Pouncey was a rookie playing Center, our two best OL were not exactly ready for primetime.

I do believe subtracting Colombo will be a net plus and that will go a long way to settling the OL

My real question is playmakers, at Wr, we really don't have any we have more of a consistent Wr corps.

I do think Hartline as the quasi 1 Wr is a risky proposition as he can go stretches were he is either injured or invisible. If we lose him we are down to DBess and real unknowns at Wr.

 

We were pretty good fir the second half of the season and we upgraded our coaches and we have a weak schedule.

 

I hated the bm trade and at first thought it created a huge hole but the fact is we dont need a #1 wr with our new offense. Greenbay is full of #2 wrs. Its gonna be a team effort this year with our wide receivers. Plus our te's, rb and maybe even our new fullback we be catching more balls this year. The way I see it is our needs are: a franchise QB, a couple of olineman, and another pass rusher.

 

Disagree, there is no way in hell Jerry looked okay at LT to me. The second Jake Long left the field our offensive line imploded upon itself.

 

You can call them #2's but two of them are excellent at it. Miami is full of 3's at best.

 

I was close to saying the same thing but I figured it wouldn't help my post. Lmao. Bess and hartline are close enough to #2's. Plus we can pick up a decent #2 in the draft if need be as long as it doesn't prevent us from filling bigger needs in this draft.

 

Who has him going to Canton?

 

We don't have a single star on the team, its not even close to set. That is a complete joke and misunderstanding of the roster to even think we are close to set. We are team that needs play makers on offense and defense to even compete for a playoff spot. Right now we are a team with 6-10 talent at best, if we draft well and the new coaching staff implements quality systems I think we can squeak out maybe 8-10 wins if we play good sound football and don't turn the ball over, but we need playmakers and a few stars or we will never contend in the AFC East let alone for the title. Oh yeah and we have the gaping hole at the Qb position......this team needs a lot of work.

 

6-10....... liking your positivity but i think you can be too positive. Our WR corp on paper is woeful.