Nice, and it sort of helps us in any sort of WC formation simply because we can use the #3 Qb anyway we wish and still have a #2 Qb to not risk getting injured.
Hmm, a Josh Portis makes a bit more sense, or if they want to get really crazy..Brad Smith.
-
-
so that means we resign pat white ?
-
-
I liked some of the things they did with Thigpen last yr out of the WC, White seemed overmatched when he tried to do them. -
-
That was such a stupid rule to begin with!
-
Frayser likes this.
-
Nappy Roots likes this.
-
Now what is sort of cool about the rule change is..we are going to see a slew of Qb's added, we have 2 rostered, we need 2 or 3 more.
Do they bring in guys for specialized WC stuff who are mediocre passers? More drop back types? A mix? 3 Qb's rostered and 1 on the practice squad..a buffet of bargain bin Qb's arriving in Miami..soon. -
-
There are a number of things that were funny about that sequence. Not least of which was, it was totally unnecessary. Tyler Thigpen finished the game anyway. He could absolutely have come in and started throwing passes or handing the ball off in the 3rd quarter, it wouldn't have mattered. They wanted to preserve Chad Henne's ability to come back in if his injury wasn't severe...but why? They'd already benched the guy. No harm in letting Thigpen play about 17 minutes of a game you're already winning, in place of a guy you benched that just hurt his knee.
-
-
-
From what I can gather the new rule is simply that you must name 46 active players on game day and nobody among the inactives is allowed to play for any reason.
In other words, list only two QBs if you dare, but if those two get hurt then you have no QB for the rest of the game. So you'd probably better list three QBs to be safe.Nappy Roots likes this. -
I never understood why all players are not active. Someone tried to explain a competitive balance because of injuries but, didn't buy that reason. Anyone else?