Tags:
  1. Jun 12, 2009 #1

    Xeticus Junior Member

    1,500
    160
    63
    Mar 30, 2008
  2. Jun 12, 2009 #2

    padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    2008=5-11=4th place
    2009=9-7=3rd place

    Amazing, we add JT, Wilson, Grove, Wake, Green, the Jets have nothing at Qb, and yet they finish ahead of us?

    We compete with the Pats for the Division Crown.

    When their listed "biggest weakness" is covering kicks, they are really looking hard for a "biggest weakness", they also did not notice our coverage team turned it around at midseason, but was so bad earlier we were stuck in 29th position or so.
     
    HULKFish likes this.
  3. Jun 12, 2009 #3

    ascii People Watcher

    2,211
    896
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    Etters, Pa
    So we have a better chance to win IN New England then against the same team at home? Methinks someones numbers be wrong!
     
  4. Jun 12, 2009 #4

    MonstBlitz Nobody's Fart Catcher

    21,207
    10,197
    113
    Jan 14, 2008
    Hornell, NY
    They can simulate the games 5,000,000. Their predictions still wouldn't be anymore accurate than mine or anyone else's. Their simulations do not have accurate talent assessments, correct playbooks, account for injury, weather, etc.
     
    siciliansith and HULKFish like this.
  5. Jun 12, 2009 #5

    PhinsRock Premium Member Luxury Box

    19,676
    4,923
    0
    Dec 2, 2007
    Asheville, NC, United States
    Agree with MonstBlitz, predictions are worthless when you don't have all the facts, changes, training and coaching factors.

    Interesting read, wrong, but interesting. Worst we do is 10-6 IMHO and best the Jests do is 7-9 IMHO. But my opinion has no homerism involved whatsoever . . . :lol:
     
  6. Jun 12, 2009 #6

    Xeticus Junior Member

    1,500
    160
    63
    Mar 30, 2008
    Honestly I think there numbers are wrong. Look at their 2008 predictions for example. But I think at worst we go 8-8 or as high as 12-4. This team has really solidified a lot of it's weaknesses.
     
  7. Jun 12, 2009 #7

    dolpns13 Chest Rockwell is my hero

    2,111
    585
    0
    Dec 3, 2007
    North Jersey
    Funny stuff.

    AND David Clowney as a fantasy sleeper??? His 1 catch in 2 years warrants this how again? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: How do they expect to go 9-7 with their fantasy sleeper being one of the WR on the roster.. haha

    Since when was Jim Leonard ever considered a top return man?
     
    padre31 likes this.
  8. Jun 12, 2009 #8

    the 23rd a.k.a. Rio

    9,173
    2,398
    113
    Apr 20, 2009
    Tampa Area
    ridiculous
    the NFL has got a reality check coming
    Miami is going to be a nightmare to play
    at home or away
    they will have to bring it through Miami
    & that is not going to be easy
     
  9. Jun 12, 2009 #9

    AquaBlitz Active Member

    275
    117
    43
    Dec 20, 2007
    Interesting read, nevertheless I've never known any person, or simulator who accurately predicted an NFL season even 50% correctly. These things are fun though, especially in the off-season.
     
  10. Jun 12, 2009 #10

    FinsAreLife Well-Known Member

    2,824
    762
    113
    Dec 7, 2007
    Their prediction for last year just proves this whole thing is a bunch of crap. I dont even look at predictions anymore after last year. Anything can and will happen. Always does...
     
  11. Jun 13, 2009 #11

    the 23rd a.k.a. Rio

    9,173
    2,398
    113
    Apr 20, 2009
    Tampa Area
    you can safely predict that Miami will be very popular team to watch but not to play against in 2009
     
(You must log in or sign up to reply here.)

Share This Page