Andrew Garfield to star in 'Spider-Man' reboot

Can't wait.

"BlameItOnTheHenne wrote:

Can't wait.

It seems like we are really going to get a smart ass spiderman.

"maynard wrote:

christ. i may to beg FinD to take me back

Still would.

New (and probably the last) trailer out. Enjoy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Fqd-9Jl6KXY

"finsincebirth wrote:

New (and probably the last) trailer out. Enjoy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Fqd-9Jl6KXY

Looks decent. And by decent I mean 10x better than that garbage w/Maguire.

Let's hope that if this one is done right, we get venom and/or carnage in the next.

Can't wait

"slickj101 wrote:

Looks decent. And by decent I mean 10x better than that garbage w/Maguire.

Let's hope that if this one is done right, we get venom and/or carnage in the next.

I'd be surprised if Venom was used so close to Spiderman 3, especially with how bad that movie was. The new film makers probably want to distance themselves from that franchise. Hopefully they will have a new villain that hasn't been used yet but I bet the next one will probably Norman Osborne again.

"Ray Finkle wrote:

I'd be surprised if Venom was used so close to Spiderman 3, especially with how bad that movie was. The new film makers probably want to distance themselves from that franchise. Hopefully they will have a new villain that hasn't been used yet but I bet the next one will probably Norman Osborne again.

That'd be weak. Willem Dafoe was actually really good as Osborne.

I'd rather see them try to redo a character that was previously garbage.

"slickj101 wrote:

That'd be weak. Willem Dafoe was actually really good as Osborne.

I'd rather see them try to redo a character that was previously garbage.

I agree, Venom was always one of my favorite Spiderman villains and I'd like to see that character done right, but the studio is going to want to stay far away from him and probably The Sandman too for the 2nd movie. I'd be willing to bet we won't see him in this series.

"slickj101 wrote:

That'd be weak. Willem Dafoe was actually really good as Osborne.

I'd rather see them try to redo a character that was previously garbage.

Considering they went with Gwen Stacey, they almost have to go with Green Goblin at some point. Besides, GG is to Spiderman, what Lex Luthor is to Superman.

"Finascious D wrote:

Considering they went with Gwen Stacey, they almost have to go with Green Goblin at some point. Besides, GG is to Spiderman, what Lex Luthor is to Superman.

I wouldn't go that far.

I'd rather just see them do another new villain but we'll see.

Well Oscorp figures prominently in this one so I think a GG appearance eventually is inevitable.

venom to me was spidermans lex luthor.

"unluckyluciano wrote:

venom to me was spidermans lex luthor.

Not from the beginning he wasn't. Green Goblin was always his main nemesis.

"Finascious D wrote:

Considering they went with Gwen Stacey, they almost have to go with Green Goblin at some point. Besides, GG is to Spiderman, what Lex Luthor is to Superman.

I agree. Makes me wonder if they will have the balls to kill her off. If they are trying to make it a "darker" Spiderman, then they should and just might do that.

"Finascious D wrote:

Not from the beginning he wasn't. Green Goblin was always his main nemesis.

GG was even more of his nemesis, because he was the first to learn Spiderman's identity.

"finsincebirth wrote:

GG was even more of his nemesis, because he was the first to learn Spiderman's identity.

wasn't he the first villain of SM too?

Maybe they'll follow the path of the Dark Knight and bring in the heavy hitter in the sequel if the first has success.

"Finascious D wrote:

Not from the beginning he wasn't. Green Goblin was always his main nemesis.

Yes but did anyone push like venom?

"unluckyluciano wrote:

Yes but did anyone push like venom?

Yes. GG, that's why I said what I did, especially with Gwen Stacey being involved.

"Finascious D wrote:

Yes. GG, that's why I said what I did, especially with Gwen Stacey being involved.

Not imo

"Do you think what happened to you Peter...was an accident?"

That right there worries me. Looks like we're getting a movie to "explain" the origin of Spiderman the way that AWFUL "Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers" tried to explain his.

Still think Garfield is too gangly to be SM...and since when was Spidey a skateboarder?

"unluckyluciano wrote:

Not imo

I'm not sure how you can know what happened to Gwen, and not say that isn't the ultimate "push".

"Pagan wrote:

"Do you think what happened to you Peter...was an accident?"

That right there worries me. Looks like we're getting a movie to "explain" the origin of Spiderman the way that AWFUL "Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers" tried to explain his.

Still think Garfield is too gangly to be SM...and since when was Spidey a skateboarder?

Just the fact that he's not Toby Maguire means he can't be any worse imo.

"slickj101 wrote:

Just the fact that he's not Toby Maguire means he can't be any worse imo.

Actually, I thought Maguire was pretty damn close to the comic version of Parker in the first movie.

Sorry, Spidey as a skaterboi doesn't cut it for me.

"Pagan wrote:

Actually, I thought Maguire was pretty damn close to the comic version of Parker in the first movie.

Sorry, Spidey as a skaterboi doesn't cut it for me.

I'd rather watch him skateboard than dance like a tool.