Blanket Coverage: Time running out for Tannehill to show Dolphins growth

Uh, yeah, maybe you should stop misrepresenting him.

I believe he said, that with our crappy D and terrible gameplans, Wilson wouldn't have been successful, and we would have gotten rid of him. I think mostly sarcastic to make a point.

"adamprez2003 wrote:

take away all of brady's touchdowns and he's out of the league as a qb failure

That literally makes zero sense. You're comparing apples to oranges.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

"finsfandan wrote:

Really? Adam said he'd be waived by us. But maybe he meant we're stupid. Perhaps somebody can find that quote.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yea but, but, but but being waived and being crappy are two totally different things bro!

"finsfandan wrote:

Really? Adam said he'd be waived by us. But maybe he meant we're stupid. Perhaps somebody can find that quote.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

i did say that but you missed the reason. it was scheme and coaches. sherman and lazor. wilson wouldnt have fit their schemes and neither likes adjusting to the players skillset the way bevell and carroll do. others got the reason though

"resnor wrote:

Uh, yeah, maybe you should stop misrepresenting him.

I believe he said, that with our crappy D and terrible gameplans, Wilson wouldn't have been successful, and we would have gotten rid of him. I think mostly sarcastic to make a point.

"adamprez2003 wrote:

I think russel Wilson would've been Waived if he had been drafted by Miami. He would've sucked in lazor's timing offense. The guy is horrible throwing slants. What was he in the championship and superbowl? 4 for 4 all the slants thrown for picks? Wilson needs that offensive scheme they run in Seattle to function. Put him on twenty other teams he would be horrible unless they started running an Osborne offense. If Wilson was drafted by Miami I think matt Moore would've been our starting qb

I can guarantee you Wilson wouldn't have sucked if he were our QB today.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

"adamprez2003 wrote:

i did say that but you missed the reason. it was scheme and coaches. sherman and lazor. wilson wouldnt have fit their schemes and neither likes adjusting to the players skillset the way bevell and carroll do. others got the reason though

I don't care what your reasons are. Wilson is better than Tannehill as a QB in every single way.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

"Fin-O wrote:

Yea but, but, but but being waived and being crappy are two totally different things bro!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

"finsfandan wrote:

I can guarantee you Wilson wouldn't have sucked if he were our QB today.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

well if you guarantee it

So what? There's absolutely no denying that Seattle won alot of games by asking Wilson to score under 25 points. I don't care how much better you think he is, he benefited greatly from a great defense and a stout run game, plus coaches who schemed to his strengths.

Tannehill has had literally none of that.

"adamprez2003 wrote:

well if you guarantee it

You said in that post that he needs a strong running game. What happened? Didn't Miller do well today?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

"finsfandan wrote:

I don't care what your reasons are. Wilson is better than Tannehill as a QB in every single way.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

who throws a better slant pass?

"resnor wrote:

So what? There's absolutely no denying that Seattle won alot of games by asking Wilson to score under 25 points. I dint care how much better you think he is, he benefited greatly from a great defense and a stout run game, plus coaches who schemed to his strengths.

Tannehill has had literally none of that.

He had a good defense for a couple of years. Too bad he can't keep the opposing defense on the field.

He had both today and we won despite him. Largely thanks to horrendous officiating. Without that, we lose to one of the worst, one of the most injured teams in the NFL that played a terrible games themselves.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Serious question...

Gun to head, Tannehill or Gabbert?

"finsfandan wrote:

You said in that post that he needs a strong running game. What happened? Didn't Miller do well today?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

and we won. like i said earlier. that was tannehill's impersonation of wilson. lean on a good defense and run game and then make a couple of dramatic plays to ensure victory

"resnor wrote:

So what? There's absolutely no denying that Seattle won alot of games by asking Wilson to score under 25 points. I don't care how much better you think he is, he benefited greatly from a great defense and a stout run game, plus coaches who schemed to his strengths.

Tannehill has had literally none of that.

He had a good defense for a couple of years. Too bad he can't keep the opposing defense on the field.

He had both today and we won despite him. Largely thanks to horrendous officiating. Without that, we lose to one of the worst, one of the most injured teams in the NFL that played a terrible games themselves.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

"resnor wrote:

Yes, he's also going to do it.

And literally no one has ever said that Wilson is crappy.

Wilson, with crappy line and low budget WRs has 107 ratings in the 4th quarter and on 3rd down, and that is above his overall 102 rating.

That is the difference between the 2 QBs, one is money, the other is not.

"finsfandan wrote:

He had a good defense for a couple of years. Too bad he can't keep the opposing defense on the field.

He had both today and we won despite him. Largely thanks to horrendous officiating. Without that, we lose to one of the worst, one of the most injured teams in the NFL that played a terrible games themselves.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Tannehill has never had a good defense. They were bad last year, don't even try to trot that argument out.

For the record, Wilson has lost close games when his back goes over 100 yards.

"resnor wrote:

So what? There's absolutely no denying that Seattle won alot of games by asking Wilson to score under 25 points. I don't care how much better you think he is, he benefited greatly from a great defense and a stout run game, plus coaches who schemed to his strengths.

Tannehill has had literally none of that.

wilson won his first game when the defense gave up more than 24 points against pittsburgh just a few weeks ago. how carzy is that stat? to be in your fourth year and never once winning a game when the defense gave up 24 points

"Finster wrote:

Wilson, with crappy line and low budget WRs has 107 ratings in the 4th quarter and on 3rd down, and that is above his overall 102 rating.

That is the difference between the 2 QBs, one is money, the other is not.

one can play action because the opposing defense is respecting the run and one finds eight or seven defensive players flooding the zones because they dont respect the run

Oh, I know. But Wilson is this clutch, elite football god, in the vein of Tebow.

He just wins games.

well i'm off to watch some walking dead. enjoy

"adamprez2003 wrote:

and we won. like i said earlier. that was tannehill's impersonation of wilson. lean on a good defense and run game and then make a couple of dramatic plays to ensure victory

If thats what he does then....

Why is he statistically better than Ryan with an even worse OL and a group of pass catchers that Tom Brady laughs at? You literally can not say those things about Wilson when he has transformed a flawed offense and is flat out a playmaker...and are QB's 2015 claim to fame is that he has improved his deep ball.

Its bringing a knife to a gun fight....lets talk Ryan vs Cutler...thats atleast not a ridiculous comparison.

"adamprez2003 wrote:

and we won. like i said earlier. that was tannehill's impersonation of wilson. lean on a good defense and run game and then make a couple of dramatic plays to ensure victory

Wow. When you've got an agenda there's nothing that can stop you from sticking to it. I applaud your stick-to-itiveness.

If by lean you mean win despite a horrendous performance then yes. I've already dismantled this argument. I don't remember the last time a QB played this poorly and still won.

Let me guess, when Wilson buried the Packers with the game winning TD pass?

Oh and how is Hasselbeck doing? Still think Luck is to blame? Flip over to NBC if you're not watching this.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

"resnor wrote:

Oh, I know. But Wilson is this clutch, elite football god, in the vein of Tebow.

He just wins games.

he has the "it" factor. ranked number three in the nfl this year

Walking Dead had mid-season finale last week, didn't they??