1. padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts


    http://blogs.palmbeachpost.com/thed...dolphins-position-breakdown-–-wide-receivers/

    I still believe the YAC issues had to do with the patterns Marshall was running and the way defenses played him, and Dan Henning's lack of creativity in using him, but the other two stats are unpretty:

    -13 drops, I can recall Garcon' being hammered for dropping passes this past yr, it did not stick to BM, his play was just as ugly.

    -7 int's on passes thrown to BM, now granted he did lead us in targets with 145, that is still a high number, one in every 21 passes thrown his way was intercepted.

    Still think he is well worth the cost of 2 #2's, but also think he needs to improve his game.
     
  2. rafael Well-Known Member

    27,364
    31,261
    113
    Apr 6, 2008
    Basically agree with all of that. Marshall has always had some drops so that shouldn't be a surprise. The disappointment was the lack of big plays, but I concur that the patterns and play calling were a big factor in that. IMO they were by far the biggest factor, above Henne's accuracy or anything Marshall did. And I also agree that he was worth the two 2s.
     
  3. padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    7 int's is way to high of a number, wonder what happened on them?

    I have two that I chalked up to BM alligator arming passes, the other 5?
     
  4. PHINANALYST Well-Known Member

    1,834
    513
    113
    Jan 3, 2008
    North Carolina
    it's because defenses keyed on taking him away .... there was rarely a clear lane to throw to him, there was almost always an underneath, a cover, and a over the top -- they just bracketed him all year. Not a bad defense philosophy, since we were so uncreative, made throwing to him a challenge, and seriously limited any ability at YAC.
     
  5. Ozzy Premium Member Luxury Box

    I sure hope that those people who agree he has a downside are not the same ones who say we need speed at Wr...
     
  6. CitizenSnips hmm.

    5,525
    4,219
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    PA
    Marshall needs to play better. The difference between him and most of our team, however, is that i know he WILL play better. This guy cares more about these numbers than we do, he'll do whatever it takes to elevate his game.
     
  7. Fin-Omenal Initiated

    36,936
    10,264
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    Thee...Ohio State University
    There is a reason we have not signed a FA who has come to Miami and played BETTER than he did before, this is NOT a WR friendly system nor has it been in about 14 years.

    Accumulating big #'s at WR takes more than just the WR himself, does BM need to improve in some areas? Yes. But lets be honest 2 1,000 WR's in how many years? No accident.
     
    SICK likes this.
  8. padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Come on now, Hartline was on pace for 1,000 yds as well, between Hartline and BM they missed 7 games in 2010.

    When Hartline broke his finger he had 600 yds plus with 4.5 games to go in the season.
     
  9. GMJohnson New Member

    14,291
    5,841
    0
    Jan 27, 2010
    Wouldnt you want to review the INTs before you say the number is too high?

    There was one vs NE where Marshall stopped on a crossing route while Henne expected him to continue. Pick. Earlier in the game, Henne forced a dig route off a play action, not seeing Ninkovich buzzing underneath. The one in Green Bay Marshall slips coming out of his out cut and the ball is thrown too far inside. Tramon Williams picks it. The one in Baltimore, Henne forces a quick slant, Marshall makes a token attempt to catch it, deflecting it right to Ed Reed. One vs Tennessee, Marshall was open on the deep post, but Henne threw the ball up the field instead of across the field, Finnegan snagged it. Another one vs NE where Marshall created a window to the inside, Henne threw outside, pick.

    Cant remember the 7th one off the top of my head, but out of the 6 I listed, most were at least partially, if not totally, Henne's fault.
     
  10. padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    How about Palmer threw 10 int's forcing the ball to TO as a measuring stick to begin from?


    GB and the Titans I did not recall, and Ninko having 2 that were targeted to BM and the Chung pick 6, to me that was on Henne as much as BM, Henne was throwing to the spot and BM knew Chung had the route sniffed out, Henne never saw Chung closing.



    A slip is a slip, that was one of those situation our defense rarely converted, but opponents always did.
     
  11. GMJohnson New Member

    14,291
    5,841
    0
    Jan 27, 2010
    T.O. is notoriously bad in terms of preventing INTs, if you throw it to him while he's covered he just kinda sits there usually. I'd have to see the individual plays, but I'm guessing T.O. didn't help much.

    On the Chung pick, that's exactly what I saw as well. Ninko's second pick in the Pats game was on a check down to either Polite or Cobbs.


    CK made a good point the other day. He said that opposing teams were constantly crowding our WRs and TE's and that any time a mistake was made, a bad throw, late throw etc, they were always in position to take advantage. IIRC 20 of a possible 27 INTs were converted against us last year, an astoundingly high number.
     
  12. padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    Yeah, wonder how much of that crowding was due to Henne not being willing to take shots downfield?

    And hit on them?

    I suspect we were being outschemed tbh it, as in the opponents' knew if they played X coverage 90% of the time Henne would do Y?
     
  13. Killerphins The Finger

    9,313
    4,169
    0
    Nov 11, 2008
    I can't believe this is being talked about now. I was *****ing about Marshall and his lack of TD production all season. Piss poor YAC avg too. A lonely 2.8 yds. I could turn around and fall down and do that.
    Marshall is supposed to be a top 5 WR in this league yet he didn't make a big play worth talking about. I didn't expect him to be the savior nor did I expect him to be exposed for the fraud that he is. The guy didn't give the effort that we deserved considering the comp. Now I see all the blame being put on Henne. LOL. Henne can only go as far as putting the ball in his hands he can't catch it for him. Some here have a crystal ball to see him breaking out in the future. BM needs to get over himself and stop playing with a me attitude. The guy plays mad at the world and gets into his own head. I would expect him to keep his focus and make some plays. That is what top notch WR's should do instead of being cute and tossing the ball out of bounds to be funny. I still don't understand why Marshall gets a pass for all the drops. Who cares if he did that in the past. Grow up and catch the fuggin' ball. :up:
    I'll stick to my guns on the guy. The hype and the player are a god damn lie until proven otherwise.
     
  14. CitizenSnips hmm.

    5,525
    4,219
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    PA
    If that's the case then he should have lived up to your expectations entirely, cause thats the exact season he had. Wasn't our savior, but wasn't our downfall either.

    This was probably Marshalls worst season and he still put out the best performance this franchise has had at WR since 2005. Knowing that, things can and probably will only get better for us and Marshall as far as production. Whether that makes us a better team has yet to be seen, but really, we know this guy can score tds. This will change.
     
  15. slickj101 Is Water

    15,886
    8,901
    113
    Dec 21, 2007
    NY
    Well they sure as **** weren't afraid of our running game.
     
  16. padre31 Premium Member Luxury Box

    99,377
    37,301
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    inching to 100k posts
    We had our 1,000 yd Wr, he accomplished that much.

    Of course, Brandon Marshall could be ones' next fixation in a quest to have a Dolphins player you just don't like, that's cool, makes message boards work.

    My take on him has not changed, glad we landed him, think draft picks are highly overrated when 50% of first rd picks do not work out for the team that drafts them, when you can land a young, proven, veteran player in the prime of their career for them it makes sense to move them.

    Put it this way, our 2010 #2 pick that went for Marshall went for the immortal Sergio "Bumped his Head" Kindle who has not so much as taken a snap in Training Camp and may never play football again...ohhh..better not trade those draft choices...:lol:
     
  17. Killerphins The Finger

    9,313
    4,169
    0
    Nov 11, 2008
    I agree he was mediocre. Trust me we wouldn't be talking about this if he lived up to the expectations.
    To me it is all about catching the football, breaking tackles and making plays. That is what BM is built to do. It didn't happen. Sure the rec numbers and the yard totals were important but not nearly as important as the TD production. Marshall can catch balls all over the field we know and he sure can kill a drive with a big drop on 3rd down.
    I'm not settling on this player because of his name.
    He has to focus, step up and prove it.
     
  18. Shamboubou Well-Known Member

    2,228
    1,004
    113
    Jan 4, 2008
    Indianapolis
    I really saw two downsides to Brandon Mashall this year. First was he dropped a number of passes. Second was Henning's offense.
     
    Ozzy likes this.
  19. GMJohnson New Member

    14,291
    5,841
    0
    Jan 27, 2010
    IMO the second one was much more damaging.
     
    Shamboubou likes this.
  20. Disgustipate Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    32,174
    58,083
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    He had over 1,000 yards while missing time, and caught around 65% of his passes. That's not in any sense bad, or mediocre. Talking about touchdowns as if they are a measure of production is fantasy football ridiculousness. Touchdowns are a function of how a player is used as much as it is anything. When you have a quarterback who has difficulty reading and challenging certain coverages, especially involving the safeties and you're in a shortened field...uhh...well... What exactly do you think is going to happen?

    Marshall is the kind of wide receiver you can force the ball to when you really shouldn't, and that's a big part of the drops problem. You can't jam him and throw his timing off, and he's big and physical enough that be can frequently out-muscle or jump or use his body position to come down with it regardless. Henne tried forcing the ball at times to Marshall when he really had no business doing it.

    And what system is that?
     

Share This Page