Was passing through the mall today and saw the blurb on ESPN. I didn't hear what was said, but I can imagine it would affect their strategy if he becomes a TO-type problem in the next month. If/when they do decide to get rid of him, they are suddenly an incident away from becoming a 1-WR show (Chris Henry would be suspended at least a year). The flip-side of this is asking if the Bungles brass is smart enough to recognize this situation and address it...history has shown them to be a rather questionable lot lately. Almost every mock draft out there right now has them going defense at the 9, with Dorsey and Ellis being the favorites. If you're the Bengals, do you take a page from the CamRaM playbook and go WR at 9 (or 46)?? Or do you stick with the 'evil you know'?? If I'm the Bengals, I trade him to Big D for one of their 1's and use it to go best WR available (Hardy, Caldwell or Jackson). But that's best-case scenario.