Demotion of Dolphins’ Allen causes fan and media frenzy

18 replies

hugoguzmanhugoguzmanNew MemberOP
Aug 27, 2008, 09:48 AM

Hey guys! I could use a little feedback:
http://www.realfootball365.com/index.php/articles/dolphins/12478

Please take a look at the format of this article and let me know if you like the way it flows and the information it provides.

Thanks!

No mercy for posters who are:
-completely one-sided
-incapable of adjusting & reforming their original opinions on a player/coach
-incapable of complimenting a player/coach they don't like or criticizing a player/coach they do like
-believe that what they think they see is beyond reproach
-incapable of exchanging opposing thoughts & ideas to arrive at a new & more refined point of view

You know who you are...:up:

DrAstroZoomDrAstroZoomluxury_box
Aug 27, 2008, 09:54 AM

Where's the media frenzy?

HardKoreXXXHardKoreXXXNew Member
Aug 27, 2008, 09:59 AM

Im banned at Finheaven so I couldnt read what they had to say about it. I agree its a ploy though. JA has looked solid and appears to be our only playmaker in the secondary.

@BaseyCrock

"Making people on the Internet feel better about their own lives since 2004"

JOjoeydolfansubscriber
Aug 27, 2008, 10:14 AM

Good lord those advertisements are real pain in the A**. I haven't been banned yet but I guess that would have to do with me not even bothering to log on anymore to see the drivel on the site.

Phin-o-ramaPhin-o-ramaNew Member
Aug 27, 2008, 10:57 AM

"DrAstroZoom wrote:

Where's the media frenzy?

yeah that....also where is the fan frenzy?

lol

BoomerBoomerluxury_box
Aug 27, 2008, 11:14 AM

Jason Allen will start at free safety.

I am the sweat not the swagger.

FiN.in.RIFiN.in.RINew Member
Aug 27, 2008, 11:21 AM

whats up w/the other guy promoted to first string?

As the crowd shook

LarryfinfanLarryfinfansubscriber
Aug 27, 2008, 11:21 AM

I think they have to put Crocker in there to see how he works with the first unit, but Allen has had too good of a preseason (can't say about practices) to not be considered the starter...JMO...that and a buck will get a cup of coffee at Mickey D's, but no one has seemingly outplayed him at the position...

Could they be looking at injury situations perhaps...seeing who fits best where if we lose someone in the secondary ???

BoomerBoomerluxury_box
Aug 27, 2008, 11:28 AM

Chris is a decent back-up/special team guy but he's decidely average in coverage. Jason has worked through his positional issues and has clearly had a very good camp. No harm in giving Crocker a carrot or two. Indeed, no harm in getting him some live bullets, especially as Jason may see some time at CB in multiple sets, meaning Crock HAS to play safety.

I am the sweat not the swagger.

cdz12250cdz12250subscriber
Aug 27, 2008, 11:38 AM

I have a feeling that the DBs are going to get moved around in different defensive sets. We saw JAllen playing corner last Saturday.

MuckMuckretired_admin
Aug 27, 2008, 11:47 AM

"hugoguzman wrote:

Hey guys! I could use a little feedback:
http://www.realfootball365.com/index.php/articles/dolphins/12478

Please take a look at the format of this article and let me know if you like the way it flows and the information it provides.

Thanks!

I like the format. It's a bit unconventional, which is always good in my book. :)

Make the throwback uniforms permanent!

VendigoVendigosubscriber
Aug 27, 2008, 11:55 AM

Cover skills aside, Crocker is a very good blitzer, which happens to be a skills Parcells covets a lot. This whole Crocker/Allen issue has a lot to do with the coaching staff trying out different packages and looking for a way to use Allen and Crocker together. With Bell already out there and Crocker obviously thrown into the starting mix I wouldn't be surprised to see us bring the safety blitz quite a lot. This is going to be a fun defensive backfield to watch.

We can forgive a man for making a useful thing as long as he does not admire it. The only reason for making a useless thing is that one admires it intensely. All art is quite useless.

hugoguzmanhugoguzmanNew Member
Aug 27, 2008, 12:05 PM

Thanks for the all of the feedback (positive and negative). "Frenzy" might have been too strong a word, but it's definitely become one of the hot topics of conversation in recent days.

Also, can you guys give me some feedback on the general format of the article? It would be much appreciated.

No mercy for posters who are:
-completely one-sided
-incapable of adjusting & reforming their original opinions on a player/coach
-incapable of complimenting a player/coach they don't like or criticizing a player/coach they do like
-believe that what they think they see is beyond reproach
-incapable of exchanging opposing thoughts & ideas to arrive at a new & more refined point of view

You know who you are...:up:

VendigoVendigosubscriber
Aug 27, 2008, 12:18 PM

"hugoguzman wrote:

Also, can you guys give me some feedback on the general format of the article? It would be much appreciated.

I do like the general idea of providing background on the actual news item in form of a comment. You might want to expand on that as it isn't done very often yet (unfortunately so) and actually makes your article worth reading even if you already know the news itself.

On the negative side, you might want to go easy on the sensationalist headlines. I know it's easy to get carried away and it does get you some additional clicks, but readers (especially those who don't much care about the Dolphins in the first place but found the headline intriguing) will feel cheated. If you promise me a frenzy, I expect a frenzy. Never make promises you can't keep. Also, if you decide to go the sensationalist route, make sure you start the actual article with it. Building "suspense" is a good idea when writing a novel but a bad one in journalism, especially online where the usual attention span is severely limited.

By the way, I sincerely hate those ads in the actual article. Personally, I'd stop reading right there.

We can forgive a man for making a useful thing as long as he does not admire it. The only reason for making a useless thing is that one admires it intensely. All art is quite useless.

DrAstroZoomDrAstroZoomluxury_box
Aug 27, 2008, 12:32 PM

Good comments, Vendigo. Keep your headlines informational -- don't oversell.

I also like the News/Commentary/Fantasy Impact format, although it's not virgin territory: Yahoo Sports has a similar approach.

djphinfandjphinfansubscriber
Aug 27, 2008, 12:35 PM

"Boomer wrote:

Jason Allen will start at free safety.

not only that but i have a feeling that their doing this switching stuff to get jason allen on the field even more.

I think he may be our DIME corner and that would bring crocker on the field as our safety.

I keep saying there is a hybrid position out there for Jason allen and it looks to me as we have found the coaches that have forsight to see this.

I wanna this kid play safety on one play, corner on the next and then a blitz from a linebacker position on the next.... let that boy use his talents and chase and cover, keep him strictly at safety and hes gonna get hurt.

jdang307jdang307subscriber
Aug 27, 2008, 12:57 PM

"DrAstroZoom wrote:

Where's the media frenzy?

Because his name is not Brett or Tom or Peyton, media frenzy is a relative word. Every so fla pub probably noted the change, with an accompanying article or blurb, and obviously enough people questioned Sparano about for him t speak on it, in turn causing all the same to print his answer.

We're talking about jason allen and chris crocker. that's about as frenzy as it can ever get for those two.

DrAstroZoomDrAstroZoomluxury_box
Aug 27, 2008, 01:00 PM

"jdang307 wrote:

Because his name is not Brett or Tom or Peyton, media frenzy is a relative word. Every so fla pub probably noted the change, with an accompanying article or blurb, and obviously enough people questioned Sparano about for him t speak on it, in turn causing all the same to print his answer.

We're talking about jason allen and chris crocker. that's about as frenzy as it can ever get for those two.

My point was the 365 article head referenced a media frenzy but didn't mention the media once in the actual article.

jdang307jdang307subscriber
Aug 27, 2008, 01:01 PM

"DrAstroZoom wrote:

My point was the 365 article head referenced a media frenzy but didn't mention the media once in the actual article.

Oh haha. I thought you were implying there was no frenzy in the first place.

To be fair, he didnt discuss the fan frenzy either. Seems to me the reader just needs to infer there was a frenzy, which there kind of was. The article is more about the position battle, not the reactions to the demotion.

I guess.

Log in to reply.