DirecTV & AT&T Merger

I had AT&T Uverse before I moved and I loved it. I have DirectTV now and like it a lot. I'm in the same boat as you as I live in an area where there is no cable companies to deliver cable where I live. You have to have a dish or get nothing.

Its really hard to say what exactly will happen at this point.

It will most likely take about a year for the deal to be approved.

How it will affect customers: prices will go up because there will be less competition.

U-Verse customers will probably get access to most of DirecTV's content, sans NFL Sunday Ticket. DirecTV customers, well... you'll probably get to buy U-Verse phone and internet as a bundle package now. And pay more for it.

I'm pretty pessimistic about this merger. Though it wouldn't be quite as big a disaster as Comcast/TWC.

I go where Sunday Ticket goes. baaaa....

You guys hear that?

That's the sound of a huge corporate dick doubling its size.

"Desides wrote:

How it will affect customers: prices will go up because there will be less competition.

U-Verse customers will probably get access to most of DirecTV's content, sans NFL Sunday Ticket. DirecTV customers, well... you'll probably get to buy U-Verse phone and internet as a bundle package now. And pay more for it.

I'm pretty pessimistic about this merger. Though it wouldn't be quite as big a disaster as Comcast/TWC.

What is the deal with the Ticket? Staying with DirecTV?

"finyank13 wrote:

What is the deal with the Ticket? Staying with DirecTV?

Unless the conglomeration of DirecTV and U-Verse pays up to add Sunday Ticket to U-Verse, yes.

There's also a clause in the acquisition proposal that says AT&T can call it off if DirecTV fails to renew Sunday Ticket agreements with the NFL.

"Desides wrote:

How it will affect customers: prices will go up because there will be less competition.

U-Verse customers will probably get access to most of DirecTV's content, sans NFL Sunday Ticket. DirecTV customers, well... you'll probably get to buy U-Verse phone and internet as a bundle package now. And pay more for it.

I'm pretty pessimistic about this merger. Though it wouldn't be quite as big a disaster as Comcast/TWC.

Do you think that they could really bring their broadband package into Verizon/Comcast monopoly areas?

"lmeister3 wrote:

You guys hear that?

That's the sound of a huge corporate dick doubling its size.

"lmeister3 wrote:

You guys hear that?

That's the sound of a huge corporate dick doubling its size.

"Unlucky 13 wrote:

Do you think that they could really bring their broadband package into Verizon/Comcast monopoly areas?

Who else will you turn to for TV? Yeah, this happens, we're kind of screwed on pricing. Expect to pay more for less in the long run.

I'm against regulation in general and think it's kind of silly that companies have to file for approval for mergers/acquisitions, but this is one time I'd support blocking a buyout. This and Comcast's Time Warner Cable merger should be blocked.

Actually, if we could get true a la carte channel selection and streaming TV on the Internet without having to have a cable/satellite subscription first, I wouldn't even mind these buyouts. Let them happen if it means advancement in other areas. Just make sure Internet usage caps can't happen.

"Desides wrote:

Who else will you turn to for TV? Yeah, this happens, we're kind of screwed on pricing. Expect to pay more for less in the long run.

I'm against regulation in general and think it's kind of silly that companies have to file for approval for mergers/acquisitions, but this is one time I'd support blocking a buyout. This and Comcast's Time Warner Cable merger should be blocked.

Actually, if we could get true a la carte channel selection and streaming TV on the Internet without having to have a cable/satellite subscription first, I wouldn't even mind these buyouts. Let them happen if it means advancement in other areas. Just make sure Internet usage caps can't happen.

I get what you said, but I don't see how it answers the question...

Literally, my only options for TV are DirecTV and Dish Network, and the latter is just horrible.

"Unlucky 13 wrote:

I get what you said, but I don't see how it answers the question...

Literally, my only options for TV are DirecTV and Dish Network, and the latter is just horrible.

I said in the first line that, yeah, we're screwed. Am I misunderstanding your question?

"Desides wrote:

I said in the first line that, yeah, we're screwed. Am I misunderstanding your question?

Well, I expect that the cost of what I curently have will go up, if for no other reason than Im "grandfathered" into an older plan with DirecTV, and pay less for the same content than a new subscriber would (not counting Sunday Ticket). I'm sure that prices will rise for that. No question.

What I wonder is will AT&T somehow be able to bring their broadband service into my area since they aren't already there? I doubt it, but it would be great if they could. The current companies in my area aren't likely to bring it to me any time soon, and over paying is better than being totally denied.

To my first question though, could they require "bundling" from everyone in order to get TV? Even for people who cannot get access to the other services? Would they just "cut the cord" on those of us who live outside their other zones?

"Unlucky 13 wrote:

Well, I expect that the cost of what I curently have will go up, if for no other reason than Im "grandfathered" into an older plan with DirecTV, and pay less for the same content than a new subscriber would (not counting Sunday Ticket). I'm sure that prices will rise for that. No question.

Supposedly, AT&T is offering to keep prices locked in at current rates for 3 years.

What I wonder is will AT&T somehow be able to bring their broadband service into my area since they aren't already there? I doubt it, but it would be great if they could. The current companies in my area aren't likely to bring it to me any time soon, and over paying is better than being totally denied.

Not without investing millions of dollars in infrastructure in your area. They need to lay the groundwork before connecting to your home.

To my first question though, could they require "bundling" from everyone in order to get TV? Even for people who cannot get access to the other services? Would they just "cut the cord" on those of us who live outside their other zones?

I don't think they legally can for anticompetitive reasons. AT&T doesn't even bundle U-Verse in areas where it's just them and Comcast competing—like in my town. You can get U-Verse phone and internet separate from TV. I have DirecTV for TV and U-Verse for phone and internet. AT&T got pissy when I kept refusing the TV package, but eventually they had to relent.

OK, thank you. I wasn't able to find that answer anywhere online. I appreciate it.

"SICK wrote:

This Gif is the perfect length.

"McLovin wrote:

This Gif is the perfect length.

Unlike your penis.

U.S. is well on it's way to becoming the United States of........

"SICK wrote:

Unlike your penis.

IKR.

http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/advice/-penis-too-big