Read more: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/dolp...ad-weather-to-an-advantage.html#ixzz0wm2rksze
During the game it was apparent that this team was not accustomed to playing in the rain especially the newcomers like Marshall.
Field conditions should be a home team advantage.I can understand the benefits of playing in the bubble when there is lightning and the benefits of avoiding injuries to players but they should at least become familiar with playing in the slop -We may have to play a game in those conditions and we should at least learn how to protect the ball.:yes:
What do you think ?
-
-
I agree and disagree with that to an extent. I mean maybe some route running catch and throw sort of stuff. But it would be pretty infuriating if Marshall was out for the season because he lost traction in a practice and tore something. Especially if we didn't end up playing any rain games that year.
I may be crazy, but I really don't remember us playing that many rain games at home in the most recent years. My memory could be off, but I just don't know if its worth risking player health for a small advantage in the event one of those games hits. -
I agree competely.
the performance of our starting QB and WR's was an embarrassment.
The wobbly ducks and the drops while Tampa's starting crew seemed unfazed.
Luckily this happened in a preseason game and they have PLENTY of time to address it.
If I was coach I'd have all the footballs soaking in a bucket for one segment of practice every day the next week. Making them throw and catch wet balls till they show it's not an issue anymore.NaboCane, finyank13 and CrunchTime like this. -
If Sparano keeps taking the team inside the bubble because of lightning worries, the team should just work with Nova to install a lightning rod somewhere on the campus. End problem.
Otherwise, if it's just injury avoidance, then that's silly. The team doesn't tackle to the ground in practice as it is. There's only so much you can do to avoid injury, and at some point you hamper your team's ability to perform in the elements. And eventually you're going to play a game in inclement weather. It's unavoidable, especially if we have to go on the road in December.CrunchTime and Coral Reefer like this. -
I think way too much is being made of the rainy night. It was our first preseason game and we came out and looked a little flat. I think the penalties we had on offense early killed the drives not the rain. That is what shot us in the foot. Ronnie ran the ball nicely and Henne didn't look totally horrible. Evreyone is freaking out and on suicide watch over a game that doesn't even count. Some people need to take a valium and relax.
Rocky Raccoon and Larryfinfan like this. -
Larryfinfan 17-0...Priceless Club Member
As for the rain...that can't be helped. Now, that muck ?? I don't know how you simulate that except by holding practice on the beach with the ebb tide...?? I don't know. That, to me falls completely on ownership. And for the pundits who say it was the same for the Bucs...nay, say I...all of their 1st team drives were in the grass, not the muck...
But there is one underlying theme here for me (call it my conspiracy theory) about this regime. While this group seems very adept at changing on the fly, adjusting during the game, etc they have left this team unprepared at times...Like unprepared for playing in the rain. Like not being prepared when Penny went down last year. Like pinning hopes on a second year FS who struggled his first year in limited PT. Like the team starting out slowly in the three years they've been here. Made some really questionable personnel moves (Wilson, Wilford, Smiley and a few others). Don't get me wrong, it's not a conviction...They've done some good things too. Started a new fad in the NFL with the WC, developed some young talent of our own for a change. Went out a got arguably the best offensive and defensive guy available this year. But that doesn't change the fact that, under them, this team starts our very, very slowly....JMHO, but is that a concern by anyone else ??cnc66, NaboCane, dolphindebby and 1 other person like this. -
Sparano is aware there have been questions about whether the Dolphins should use the rainy season in South Florida to practice in the rain. The Dolphins have not practiced in the rain this season and he clearly falls on the side of folks that believe doing so raises the chances of injury.
...And by the way, his is the only opinion that really matters.
"You're in a downpour out here, A, you risk injury. B, you risk the opportunity to have an inefficient practice -- a sloppy, inefficient practice,"
Read more: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/dolp...-on-weather-other-subjects.html#ixzz0woZHc7Uv -
Well, coach, if you don't have those "sloppy, inefficient" practices in inclement weather, you wind up having "sloppy, inefficient" games. Like the one we saw on Saturday.
Wet ball drills don't simulate soggy turf.Coral Reefer likes this. -
cnc66 and Sethdaddy8 like this.
-
Here's what I would do: rip all the turf off one practice field; put 6" of that red clay on it; SOAK it, and make players practice on it at the end of EVERY day.
It's shameful that the Dolphins have never made that goddamn infield part of their home-field advantage. A team with some common sense would have; teams with WINNING mentalities make natural adversities such as this into an advantage for themselves.
Teams with loser mentalities just throw up their hands year after year for 20 years and accept the status quo.
From top to bottom, this organization - obviously, by the results - does NOT even begin to address what has always been a real issue. From not practicng in mud, to not proving longer spikes or whatever other equipment solutions there must be to make playing on the dry clay or wet mud better, the team FAILS at having a proactive, problem-solving mentality.
I said it long ago, but as long as we had to have that goddamn infield, we should have been playing on field turf surface.
Other teams play on it and it's fine, not like the nasty astroturf of yesteryear; and adding turf over the infield would be a piece of cake, as opposed to just living with that crap and essentially living with a poor field all season, since grass takes weeks to root properly and there's not enough time between the end of bball and football season's end to get a good turf going. -
Now I know we run that risk everyday but the risk is higher in the rain. The fans would be upset if it was a sunny day but they would never forgive the man if a major injury occurred during a practice that could have been held indoors and was avoidable. -
-
-
Training camp itself is an injury risk. Your position makes little sense, because you assume that injuries are avoidable. You can mitigate the risk, but you can't eliminate them entirely.Coral Reefer likes this. -
Also go back and read where I said injuries can happen even if it is a sunny day. I put that out there early because I was well aware beforehand that someone would try to use that argument against me. :wink2: -
Coral Reefer likes this.
-
I think this whole thing is overblown. Everyone talks about how the Buccaneers didn't seem to have a problem playing in the rain but we don't have any evidence that this is because they practice in the rain. Maybe, just maybe, they simply played better regardless of the rain.
-
BTW we dont play in a roofed stadium and we could very well face a team in similar conditions .South Florida weather can be very unpredictable.
If we face similar conditions in a real game and we lose there will be some questioning of Sparano's decision.
BTW why was injury prone Ronnie kept in the game so long if there are injury concerns about playing in bad weather ?cnc66 and Coral Reefer like this. -
Anyone who has played organized sports seriously knows that a good coach will ananlyze and pick apart every single thing bad thing that you do in a practice or game setting in an to make you and the team better. It's not about "freaking out" it's about preparing to be a good team in all circumstances. Practice and preseason is for the exact purpose of becoming a well prepared team. As you go through you solidify what the team is showing they're good at while doing every possible thing you can to correct weaknesses.
If your team shows an alarming inability to perform in wet conditions then it's not something you just go "oh well who cares" and expect to be a solid team.
Conditions such as these can cause you a couple critical games over a season.
All of you playing this "we don't want to hurt the guys" angle to me is silly.
If the coach really thinks there is a major difference in injury potential with wet conditions (which I don't necessarily agree with) all you have to do is wet balls down in the pansy bubble and force repetitions from QB to WR's until they show they can handle a wet ball. They don't even have to get their tootsies wet.
Personally I don't favor that angle because I think they should practice in wet conditions but it would at least be an effort to correct the issue.
No one is "freaking out" like your attempting to insinuate.
People are saying that this is an issue that should be addressed and corrected. That's what you do in preseason. To ignore it would be ignoring the concept of perparing to succeed. -
It dosen't mean anything.
What does mean something is that the Dolphins were NOT able to handle it.
It's not overblown at all.
I don't know a coach I've ever played for that would ever tell you that focusing on correcting any mistakes a team makes is "overblown".
If your team shows they can't handle any situation then you practice to corrrect it. In this case, the problem was clearly wet conditions. If they don't work to correct that it may very well come back and bite them in the arse. -
-
Having said that, it's pretty obvious it was the wet conditions that caused an issue. when you realize it was a problem with ball grip and its a fact that wet conditions cause a slippery surface on a football. In addition, just about every single player interviewed after the game mentioned the wet conditions as being a challenge.
You can sit here and get cutsie philosophical with the "correlation not indicating causation" or you can connect the dots to what the most likely causation is. -
GMJohnson likes this.
-
All that's been said is that he does not favor practicing in wet weather because of injuries. Dosen't mean Sparano isn't addressing the issue in a different manner. We don't know.
What I have a different stance on is people forwarding the idea that someone pointing out an area the team needs to get better at are "freaking out" or are
"acting like the sky is falling". -
Killerphins likes this.
-
-
Are you really referencing the Bucs 2nd and 3rd stringers for a direct comparison exhonerating our starters performance? I certainly hope our coaching staff dosen't have such similar low expectations for our starting teams performance.
People on this site developed this "rain gate" observation as soon as it happened. No media needed thanks. Team played in wet conditions. There were issues that are very common with a team unprepared to deal with such conditions. QB throwing wobbly balls and WR's dropping passes that would normally be caught. It's just an observation on something the team clearly needs to work on. No one is "freaking out" like Killer is trying to paint.
Simple issue the team needs to address and I'm sure they will. -
No one has "freaked out", no one has said the entire season is in jeopardy and the angle has been explained to you in as simplified and intelligent a manner possible. I got it. You're belief is that a team dosen't watch film and practice to correct mistakes and weaknesses. They simply ignore them and hope for the best. Duly noted. -
I'll stick to my stance though that Dolphin world would absolutely lose its mind if he changed his mind and held a session out in the rain and we suffer a major injury. You and some others are upset over us being flat in our first preseason game in the rain. If we lost a player practicing in the rain the world would end. Spararno would be tarred and feathered. -
Pointing out the obvious and discussing it is "freaking out" to you apparently.
As I said. Coaches analyze the most miniscule things to make their teams better. You saying they won't pay attention to the performance in the wet contradicts that completely. Again, there are ways to address problems of a wet ball without what Sparano may consider "endangering players".
In addtion I am able to disagree with a decision a coach makes. He's taking a calculated risk by avoiding all wet conditions and that's a fact. His decision but as past history has shown, just because a person is in position of power dosen't mean they always make the right decisions. You know that as well as I do.
I also don't agree that Sparano would be tarred and feathered if a player was injured in a wet practice. People would just realize that injuries happen playing this sport and it's pretty impossible to keep it from happening. Look at all the injuries we've had in perfect conditions. The wet field injury angle is pretty pointless. If you want to keep injuries from happening we should just opt out of Training camps and preseason altogether.
I'm done discussing this issue with you though because all I'll continue to get are irrational claims about "freaking out" and "sky falling" rather than lucid discussion about team performance.NaboCane likes this. -
The Dolphins practice with wet footballs but that isn't enough I guess.
We can end this discussion and let the topic die out.... at least till the next time it rains.