Nothing really there that you would not expect to hear whether its true or not. The proof will be in the puttin as in puttin it into the endzone.

 

I dont think he sucks. I would say his chemistry with Tanny has been a disappointment and I ut equal blame on them both. I think Tannys ball placement sucked at time. I think Wallace's effort sucked at times, and I think at times they just were not on the same page. They got a whole offsaeason to fix it, lets hope they can and they do.

 

Daf*q is puttin?

 

What's a matter...you never put it in before?:shifty:

 

Yeah man. This is something I've been really psyched to see heading into the season.

 

:shifty:

Back on topic: To be expected. Tanny has improved each year, I expect him to do so again.

 

That's the key. There's no reason to expect that he peaked last year, unless you count the trauma of past Phins QB's as a reason. I'm trying to forget everyone post-Marino but Pennington, because they have nothing to do with Tannehill, but it's tough being a battered fan. Still, if Tannehill improves a little bit in a few areas, next season will be fun to watch.

 

He just needs to get a little bit better for us to win a Superbowl with a good supporting cast.

30/12/4000 and less fumbles is pretty damn good.

 

Fumbles really bothered me last year, especially the one he had against NO where he was hardly touched. He totally cleaned that up 2nd half of the season so maintain that, fewer INT's and a couple more TD's coupled w/ an improved run game and we are pretty solid.

 

He has to at least be Andy Dalton by the numbers. If he can get that yardage and touchdown production while and throwing only 12 interceptions, then that's franchise right there. He's -9 away in touchdowns, -300 away in yardage, and +5 in interceptions. Yardage and interceptions are doable especially considering he only threw 13 INT's as a rookie. The Buffalo game with all of 82 yards accounts for him coming in under 4,000 yards. If he had kept pace with the weeks prior, he'd have reached that yardage mark and probably added a touchdown or two as well. I'm concerned about his completion percentage and the touchdowns though.

 

That's what I'm saying. Philip Rivers numbers aren't that far off. 34/11, 28/9, etc. etc. Rivers has great accuracy though, so Tanny needs to catch up in that regard. Rivers is underrated because he doesn't throw for 40 TDs, but 65% accuracy, 30TDs, 10 INTs, 4500 yards is excellent. It's not elite, but I'll take those numbers any year.

A solid defense and good run game and you're Super Bowl capable every year. Of course coaching has killed the chargers who should have won a few by now.

Matt Ryan numbers are good too.

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...hpModule_a4df998e-86a7-11e2-9d71-f0feafdd1394

Can anyone verify this? I've heard the 6 of 36 deep to Wallace, as well as 16/64 to all receivers, but this is the first I've heard that of the 36 deep to Wallace, only 8 were catch-able.