GBN 3 round mock draft 2/11/16

17 replies

JIjim1New MemberOP
Feb 12, 2016, 08:25 AM

8 MIAMI *Myles Jack LB UCLA

42 Miami *Kendall Fuller CB Virginia Tech

73 Miami John Theus OT Georgia

http://gbnreport.com/2016-first-round-projection/

FIfinsbuck719New Member
Feb 12, 2016, 10:13 AM

seeing more and more mocks with us taking Jack at 8. and I'm liking that a lot.

PerfectTeamPerfectTeamforum_veteran
Feb 12, 2016, 12:35 PM

No thank you to Theus. I've watched some of his film and I'm not a fan. Doesn't look athletic enough to stay at LT and we already have an adequate RT. I'd be taking either Nick Martin, Carl Nassib, Vonn Bell, Jayron Kearse, Nick Vannett, Chris Jones, or Austin Hooper if it fell that way. The only other issue I have with this mock is that the first two picks are coming off injury and I'm not sure how extensive Fuller's injury was. I like both players though for sure.

JIjim1New Member
Feb 12, 2016, 12:43 PM

"PerfectTeam wrote:

No thank you to Theus. I've watched some of his film and I'm not a fan. Doesn't look athletic enough to stay at LT and we already have an adequate RT. I'd be taking either Nick Martin, Carl Nassib, Vonn Bell, Jayron Kearse, Nick Vannett, Chris Jones, or Austin Hooper if it fell that way. The only other issue I have with this mock is that the first two picks are coming off injury and I'm not sure how extensive Fuller's injury was. I like both players though for sure.

I would take Josh Garnett all day over Theus in that mock, plus Harlan Miller and Miles Killebrew, also Will Redmond and Tyler Matakevich.

gunn34gunn34New Member
Feb 12, 2016, 12:45 PM

it did address needs

Shane FalcoShane FalcoNew Member
Feb 12, 2016, 02:55 PM

If we started the draft like that, I will call playoffs.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

DGdgfredNew Member
Feb 12, 2016, 04:08 PM

You better call for a couple more OL instead.

sports24/7sports24/7subscriber
Feb 12, 2016, 08:30 PM

"dgfred wrote:

You better call for a couple more OL instead.

That's what free agency is for.

Follow me on twitter. Or don't @Adam_Vaccaro

sports24/7sports24/7subscriber
Feb 12, 2016, 08:31 PM

I'd be elated with those first two picks.

Follow me on twitter. Or don't @Adam_Vaccaro

DGdgfredNew Member
Feb 12, 2016, 09:11 PM

"sports24/7 wrote:

That's what free agency is for.

Whom are you eyeing?

305305forum_veteran
Feb 13, 2016, 08:44 AM

Is take that over the Ragland mock draft in a heartbeat unless it was a trade down

We're all here because we're all not there.

FIFin4Eversubscriber
Feb 13, 2016, 11:44 AM

I would rather have Cody Whitehair as a LG draft pick. Adam Gotsis, GT/ DT/DE, in the 4th would be a steal. Of course, Miles Jack, or Noah Spence in the 1st....Spence is also gonna be a very special player imho.

sports24/7sports24/7subscriber
Feb 16, 2016, 01:29 PM

"dgfred wrote:

Whom are you eyeing?

It's actually a pretty good FA guard class, so I'd be happy with a few different guys. Osemele, Brooks, Boone, Foster.

I think going the FA route is a safer proposition, and you should get immediate results whereas if you draft a guy there's no guarantee he'll ever give you much, and if he does it could take some time.

Follow me on twitter. Or don't @Adam_Vaccaro

DGdgfredNew Member
Feb 16, 2016, 01:43 PM

Yeah, I like Osemele too.

BrasfinBrasfinforum_veteran
Feb 17, 2016, 09:31 AM

"finsbuck719 wrote:

seeing more and more mocks with us taking Jack at 8. and I'm liking that a lot.

I'm actually seeing the opposite now. Most drafts have Jack going to the Cowboys at 4 or somewhere else before our pick. Most of the drafts I've seen have us picking Vernon Hargreaves and I think they're going to be right.

Barring any crazy changes in player's stocks after the combine (or left field FA signings), this is starting to feel like a couple of past drafts where everyone and their mother knew exactly who we were going to pick... reminds me of the Pouncey draft and the Tannehill draft, nearly all mock drafts had us taking them and we eventually did.

DGdgfredNew Member
Feb 17, 2016, 10:10 AM

I just don't see him for Dallas. I think they will go QB either at their pick or trading back some. They GOT to get somebody soon.
RGIII won't get it IMO. They may even resign their MLB and isn't Jack going to be an OLB? I guess him and S.Lee would make a good combo tho. They are also talking WR Treadwell and desperate for CB help on the Cowboy forums.

DGdgfredNew Member
Feb 17, 2016, 10:35 AM

Just looked again at the Cowboys stuff again:

Needs ratings: QB - 1 / CB & DE - 2 / RB, LB, WR, DT - 3 / OT & S - 4 / C, OG, TE - 5

They are mentioning no QB in rd 1 tho... instead wanting DE/DT, CB, RB or WR. Interesting.

FIfinsbuck719New Member
Feb 17, 2016, 11:10 AM

"Brasfin wrote:

I'm actually seeing the opposite now. Most drafts have Jack going to the Cowboys at 4 or somewhere else before our pick. Most of the drafts I've seen have us picking Vernon Hargreaves and I think they're going to be right.

Barring any crazy changes in player's stocks after the combine (or left field FA signings), this is starting to feel like a couple of past drafts where everyone and their mother knew exactly who we were going to pick... reminds me of the Pouncey draft and the Tannehill draft, nearly all mock drafts had us taking them and we eventually did.

man, I hope theyre wrong then. I'm really not sold on Hargreaves especially at 8. if we were to take him or any of the CBs projected in the first, I much rather us find a way to trade down into the 20s and pick up a lot more picks. I like the talent later in the draft at CB and I think we can wait on them and grab other needs early. Keivarae Russell, Cyrus Jones, Harlan Miller are all guys I think we can grab in the middle rounds who I think could be quality starters in the NFL. Not entirely sold on Hargreaves, Alexander, or Apple..especially in the first.

reason why I don't like Hargreaves is he is inconsistent. Against Michigan, he got torn up in coverage and appeared to even be benched for a few series, while Tabor was out on the field essentially the whole game. Then you put on the Tennessee tape and I don't think he gives up a single catch in man to man, but he wasn't covering any talent. idk if he even covered North at all that game and he is the best WR Tenn has and he's only projected as a late round draft pick. Other than that, I was focusing on his tackling ability and wasn't impressed. He missed 4 tackles that game and any time a WR got his hands on him to block, he was essentially taken out of the play. Complete opposite in the New Mexico State game...he gets beat on a double move which should've been a TD if it was a better thrown ball, but other than that he didn't give up anything (again though, facing no talent)... but he was a tackling machine in that game.

Log in to reply.