wow... there is no mistaking that is the outline of a person, or in this case "apparition." curious to see what the experts in the field of photography have to say. part of me is a skeptic, what with technology being what it is today, but on the other hand, part of me remembers vividly seeing a ghost myself when i was a kid.
Even if they could I'd never understand why someone would fake stuff like that. They don't profit from it. Is every ghost photo out there fake? Who knows
People fake it for attention. Its not always about money. Take for example the infamous 'Loch Ness Monster' photo in Scotland. That guy didnt profit from his hoax, not significantly anyway... I cant stand these silly paranormal shows like the one on A&E with the kids. Thank God that DOUCHE John Edwards isn't around anymore.
The first two don't really look like anything, smudges or something, the last one looks like a real person, not a ghost. Not saying its not real, but really does not prove anything, send in the ghost hunters!
very cool. hopefully its real. it'd be interesting for sure if it were. Sure clearly looks like a "person" in the third, and pretty much in the first one too.
But that photo is nationally known. There are tons of photos and videos online that show ghosts. None of them have the notoriety as Loch Ness. I totally get the they want attention part of it. I just don't get it
The 1st one looks the most "real". I can't make out anything in the 2nd and the 3rd just looks too perfect but then again, maybe it's just that simple.
Ghost Hunters was there. http://www.scifi.com/ghosthunters/episodes/episodes.php?seas=4&ep=0402&act=1 It was a pretty good episode too and if I remember they did deem the joint haunted, which does give these photos some verification.