No, to go undefeted you need a lighter schedule.
How about:
"If make the playoffs, should Sparano and Ireland be given an extension?"
Rex Ryan has tried to lose weight :shifty:
I'm neutral but enjoy reading optimistic posts more then pessimistic ones. :hi5:
I don't think anyone really thinks we might go undefeated... Agree we need to focus 1 game at a time... Buffalo in week 1 is no different which is why I said: definitely winnable, just need to be prepared and focused.
I just don't want to dwell/debate on what if we suck to start out the season. I want to think about what if we are the team our roster says we should be. The FO kept the best 53 they could, and didn't care about when they were drafted or what they cost. It was focused on who has the most potential to help this team contend. Everyone seems focused on the picks they made that they were willing to cut the strings instead of looking at the other moves we made and the guys we were able to get/keep. When I look at our roster on paper we should be solid. Just need to execute.
IMO the worst we should start out is 2-2, 3-1 or 4-0 are definitely a possibility.
But first... we need to take care of Buffalo.
That may have been a bit more realistic...
Although to answer... No... just making the playoffs doesn't get them an extension... We need to win a playoff game or the division first. :up:
game four is the crucible. how we stand in game four will dictate the direction & changes we go with... got to play one game @ a time. lets hope for a Sparano fix & 'Quick Start" against Buffalo. appropriate to recognize concerns, inappropriate to judge the season before it plays out.
14-2. Guaranteed
I had a happy gland orgasm in this thread. I've been angry at these cliff jumper posts.
I would be satisfied with 3-1, but right now I think we might be looking at 2-2.