Tags:
  1. Feb 11, 2009 #1

    Paul 13 Chaotic Neutral & Unstable Genius Staff Member

    87,131
    54,298
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    Rumors out of San Diego persist that the Chargers will franchise tag Sproles and then look to deal him and his 6.6 mill cap number... question is, what would an interested team offer in return. The Chargers may take less than two firsts as it is highly doubtful any team would part with that high of a cost. Yet how much less would they accept for the diminutive one...???
     
  2. Feb 11, 2009 #2

    BuckeyeKing Wolves DYNASTY!!!!

    25,411
    5,743
    113
    Dec 6, 2007
    No lets watch SD franchise him and eat that cap number :tongue2:
     
    Skeet84 and daphins like this.
  3. Feb 11, 2009 #3

    Paul 13 Chaotic Neutral & Unstable Genius Staff Member

    87,131
    54,298
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    heh... shut...
     
  4. Feb 11, 2009 #4

    schisno Well-Known Member

    2,972
    1,769
    113
    Jan 3, 2008
    I'll send you a 7th rounder
     
  5. Feb 11, 2009 #5

    daphins A-Style

    5,450
    2,632
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    HA!

    6.6 mil and a high pick for a little one year wonder? Usually I'd say SOMEONE will take that offer but since Paul is the one dealing Sproles.......
     
  6. Feb 11, 2009 #6

    Paul 13 Chaotic Neutral & Unstable Genius Staff Member

    87,131
    54,298
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    :tongue2: someone will take that offer... :shifty:
     
  7. Feb 11, 2009 #7

    Paul 13 Chaotic Neutral & Unstable Genius Staff Member

    87,131
    54,298
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    I'll send you one of these... :sigh:
     
  8. Feb 11, 2009 #8

    schisno Well-Known Member

    2,972
    1,769
    113
    Jan 3, 2008
    Dear god I hope that wasn't your orgasm face
     
    GridIronKing34 and BuckeyeKing like this.
  9. Feb 11, 2009 #9

    anlgp ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A

    22,211
    7,318
    0
    Sep 21, 2008
    39° 9' 29" N / 75° 31' 29" W
    i'll send a hot babe to your house for sproles.
     
  10. Feb 11, 2009 #10

    Paul 13 Chaotic Neutral & Unstable Genius Staff Member

    87,131
    54,298
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    lmao
     
  11. Feb 11, 2009 #11

    Paul 13 Chaotic Neutral & Unstable Genius Staff Member

    87,131
    54,298
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    :yes:
     
  12. Feb 11, 2009 #12

    BuckeyeKing Wolves DYNASTY!!!!

    25,411
    5,743
    113
    Dec 6, 2007
    I don't understand why anyone would do this. Besides who wants to see a bidding war?!?!
     
  13. Feb 11, 2009 #13

    anlgp ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A

    22,211
    7,318
    0
    Sep 21, 2008
    39° 9' 29" N / 75° 31' 29" W
    wait til I put asomugha out...
     
  14. Feb 11, 2009 #14

    schisno Well-Known Member

    2,972
    1,769
    113
    Jan 3, 2008
    Paul use to work at an Auction, so this whole bidding thing is in his blood. Just watch out for his gavel.
     
    Paul 13 likes this.
  15. Feb 11, 2009 #15

    BuckeyeKing Wolves DYNASTY!!!!

    25,411
    5,743
    113
    Dec 6, 2007
    Didn't you franchise him? Wouldn't he cost a 1st and a 3rd?
     
  16. Feb 11, 2009 #16

    schisno Well-Known Member

    2,972
    1,769
    113
    Jan 3, 2008
    only if someone bid on him and Oakland prefer to takethe first and third. Otherwise he can match and then freely trade him away
     
  17. Feb 11, 2009 #17

    anlgp ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A

    22,211
    7,318
    0
    Sep 21, 2008
    39° 9' 29" N / 75° 31' 29" W
    two first rounders but if he is signed i may just put him out.
     
  18. Feb 11, 2009 #18

    Paul 13 Chaotic Neutral & Unstable Genius Staff Member

    87,131
    54,298
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    Well, I'm not going to beat around the bush... the 6.6 mill is a hinderance... and basically puts me out of the free agency race for anyone of note... not that I can't bottom feed... done it before, got some bargains last season. But, I'd rather not
     
  19. Feb 11, 2009 #19

    BuckeyeKing Wolves DYNASTY!!!!

    25,411
    5,743
    113
    Dec 6, 2007
    Why not tender him?
     
  20. Feb 11, 2009 #20

    schisno Well-Known Member

    2,972
    1,769
    113
    Jan 3, 2008
    you can only tender restricted free agents. Sprole is unrestricted
     
  21. Feb 11, 2009 #21

    BuckeyeKing Wolves DYNASTY!!!!

    25,411
    5,743
    113
    Dec 6, 2007
    Ah I meant Transition.
     
  22. Feb 11, 2009 #22

    Paul 13 Chaotic Neutral & Unstable Genius Staff Member

    87,131
    54,298
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    that only gives you the right to match, and you still have to chunk down what 5.9 mill for Sproles (and I guess that's where the bidding starts)... transition tags are STOOPID! you get nothing if you don't match... not even one of these :sigh:
     
  23. Feb 11, 2009 #23

    schisno Well-Known Member

    2,972
    1,769
    113
    Jan 3, 2008
    It was used effectively last season by the Patriots GM who Franchised Brady and Transitioned Moss or something like that allowing him to keep both.
     
  24. Feb 11, 2009 #24

    daphins A-Style

    5,450
    2,632
    113
    Mar 22, 2008

    it was asante and moss.....brilliant move by myself........

    :theman::hammertime:
     
  25. Feb 11, 2009 #25

    Paul 13 Chaotic Neutral & Unstable Genius Staff Member

    87,131
    54,298
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    yean anyway.... :lol: I"m not against keeping Sproles...
     
(You must log in or sign up to reply here.)

Share This Page