There has been a lot of talk lately about the pyramid dug up in my home country of Bosnia. A bosnian explorer named Semir Osmanagic believes he has dug up Europe's first pyramids. He says that they are over 12,000 years old. Critics say that it is not a pyramid because the found walls and balconies are not a signs of a pyramid.
Here is a link to the questioning of the pyramid: http://www.bosnian-pyramid.net/Is-t...-no-evidence-of-pyramid-under-hill-in-Bosnia/
Those critics believe that there isn't a pyramid but there was a thermal satellite analysis done and it indicated a bosnian pyramid.
Here is a link to Osmanagic's quotes regarding his discovery: http://www.bosnian-pyramid.com/pyramid1.php
Now I ask you, what do you believe of this?
This is the latest photo of the discovery :
Tags:
Page 1 of 2
-
-
-
-
-
-
Celtkin likes this.
-
Heh, if it was built from the ground up it's a pyramid.
-
-
Pyramids are found in many ancient cultures because they are the simplest and most logical way to build a high man made structure.We are talling about people who only had basic natural materials to work with .They did not have the benefit of steel reinforcement so they could not build skyscraper type of structures to achieve heigth
They were usually built to glorify the gods or house the priests or nobility or those of high stature in their respective societies.
The theory was that the higher you built a structure the closer you would be to the gods . Consequently the higher you lived in a structure the more important you would be in that society.
In addition a high structure provides a better defense against enemies.
Having said that I think that this particular pyramid is natural .If there was an advanced culture in that region there would be more pyramids and more evidence of its existence .
Its not unusual to have straight lines and geometric shapes found in nature .alen1 likes this. -
-
the 'Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun' foundation, whatever that is, said the geologist said that. As far as I can tell, there is no direct quote from any geologist save..
There are no absolute dates at all, let alone any that would pin it between 12,000 and 500 BC. If I had to guess, I would say there's a later site on the top and sides. It's not uncommon for big hilltops to see fortifications during time of large-scale warfare, complete with wall, terraces, wells etc.
This guy is tunneling through the stuff, potentially wrecking Bosnian heritage, try desperately to find something that would suggest an Atlantis connection.Last edited: May 30, 2008gafinfan, CrunchTime and alen1 like this. -
If this is 'definitely' a pyramid, then Vermont and New Hampshire were the centers of the universe
-
alen1 likes this.
-
That was Erick Von Daniken theory in his book The Chariots of the Gods.He theorized that the Mayan pyramids were somehow related to the egyptian pyramids and that both cultures were taught how to make pyramids by extraterrestial beings :shifty:.
Pyramids were common to American indians in the mississippi basin,to the Mayans in Central America and the Incas in South America.The pyramids were used for completely different purposes.No relation.
There were pyramids in Mesopotania ,southeast asia again used for different purposes .
The conclusion many experts have made is that if an ancient culture wanted to build a high structure for any reason it would have to be a pyramid .:yes: -
http://www.bosnian-pyramid.com/pyramid1.php -
The problem I have with the 'excavations' is not that they're done by an amateur. Bosnia, after all, has no formal archaeology office or programs. The issue is that he already has his mind made up, and if he finds some late period artifacts, chances are they'll get swept under the rug. The man, after all, has sunk 20 grand of his own money into this thing.
The very worst archaeology projects are ones where the researchers' minds are already made up. He's decided this is a pyramid, perhaps the oldest in the world, and he's out to prove it by selectively inviting geologists and lifting quotes from them. The man's excavation notes are a nightmare. He's after architecture, not artifacts, meaning that a whole class of data (if it even exists) is getting thrown over his shoulder
This is good for some tourism, but on the whole, really really bad for understanding Bosnian prehistory or history. Epically bad if it is a pyramid -
alen1 likes this.
-
if you want to compare this to a bona-fide case of someone finding a gigantic and early pyramid, google El Mirador in lowland Guatemala. It was probably a preClassic Maya 'city' with a pyramid rivaling any of the Old World ones (though pyramids in the Americas came in all shapes and sizes and generally functioned much much differently).
-
they haven't got anything to carbon date. For those who don't know how it works, you can only carbon date stuff that was once alive, and then only if there is enough carbon (though you don't need much) and if it hasn't been contaminated
Celtkin likes this. -
I found this, pretty lengthy.
If you go to the link, theres more information on the bottom. There is detailed pictures of the area surrounding the pyramid. -
I'm kind of confused about the picture you provided alen. The pictures I see are just of, what appears to me, as a pyramidal-shaped hill, while the one you had in your first post actually seems to be a structure of some sort (which to me does have signs of being an actual pyramids).
Because this picture (which is just a smaller/different angled viersion of the one on the Bosnian Pyramid website)...
...differs greatly from the picture in your first post.
I have to agree that the picture you provided does look a bit like the Mayan/Aztec/Incan style but I have a question...are those actually pyramids that they built? I mean I only know specifically about the Ancient Egyptian pyramids, but I'm sure you can get really technical and specific with the classifications. For example, would you consider the Ancient Sumerian ziggurats (which were religious temples, similar in some ways to Ancient Egyptian pyramids) a pyramid?
Sorry about going on my philosophical/speculative tangent of actually coming up with a definition of a pyramid. I find it's actually really helpful...or entertaining to say the least.Last edited: May 30, 2008 -
As for the pyramids being actually built, I don't believe we know that yet. It may have been built on top of a structure that was already there like cnc stated but it may have been formed from nature.
The ancient Sumerian ziggurats seem to look like pyramids to me. They also seem to be more advanced pyramids than others.
No problem with the lesson bro, I don't mind. I don't mind learning about history at all. If you were talking about Chemistry, that would be a completely different story lol.Last edited: May 30, 2008 -
on the subject of pyramids, they really do differ quite greatly. Crunch, I think, is spot on to say they're a common solution to a common problem.
The Incas, as far as I know, never constructed pyramids of their own. They build impressive walls, roads and re-sculpted hills, but the South American versions belong largely to the Moche (in fact, these are the biggest in the Americas I think) and at least one example at the site of Tiwanaku, both previous to the Incas. The Incas co-opted large mounds at the oracle site of Pachacamac near Lima, Peru, but weren't responsible for the construction.alen1 likes this. -
-
The Incas conquered another native tribe in the mountains of Peru who had a pyramid cult .All the major families had their own pyramids and they would live in them in platforms built on top of their pyramids.
It was only recently discovered.Until that time they thought the pyramids were natural because the area is surrounded by mountains.
When I get time I will try to find a reference to it.alen1 likes this. -
Actually there were several tribes in Peru that built pyramids including the Mochas
Inca pyramids in Peru
Mysterious Pyramid Complex Discovered in Peru
I cant remember the name of the tribe that had the pyramid cultalen1 likes this. -
alen1 likes this.
-
Also, thanks for the links. I started reading and I noticed that Peru's pyramids have flat tops like Mexico's, also mentioned in the article. It seems like all or most Latin American pyramids were structured with flat tops. The interesting thing I find about the flat top pyramids is that despite it being a religious center, it is created to come closer to the god and for the tribes to feel like they have an advantage over other tribes by being "closer" to god, yet they have a flat top.CrunchTime likes this. -
All the biggest pyramids are on the north coast of Peru, and like most other places in the world, some of the very biggest monuments are the earliest in the area's sequence. The Initial Period (1800-200 BC) monuments are some of the absolute largest in the world but aren't pyramids in the classic sense, they are U-shaped and aren't beside sizeable habitations. Caral is a version of this and a currently researched site to look up if you guys are interested. El Paraiso, I think, is the biggest. Cerro Sechin and Sechin Alto are the coolest.Last edited: May 30, 2008CrunchTime and alen1 like this.
Page 1 of 2