Now correct me If I'm wrong, but O'Neal, Taylor, Dent and Randle are all in the HoF?
-
-
-
-
JT > Strahan, IMO. JT has better stats all across the board. If he retires at the end of this season, he might be a few sacks behing Strahan, but he defended the run better than Strahan and he has made more game changing plays. Strahan, however, has a SB ring, which makes all the difference in the world.
-
5 Michael Strahan 141 1/2
8 JASON TAYLOR 132 1/2 -
-
Ophinerated and Tin Indian like this.
-
Yep it would take 9 to tie for 5th. JT may not have the Ring, but he does have a DPOY Award to go with his numbers too. That has to count for something.
By the way, while we're on the subject of rings, I think that as any kind of a yardstick is about as meaningless as a argument as I have ever heard for HOF consideration. Football is a team sport and a SuperBowl win is a team accomplishment more than any other. 1 person does not win a SuperBowl, it takes 52 other people plus the coaches to get it done. A ring as a yardstick is meaningless.Ophinerated likes this. -
-
Ophinerated likes this.
-
The man has had a great career. I am looking forward to his induction. It may take a while but, it should happen. Of course there are others out there that you would think would be in, but still haven't.
I hope he makes it.padre31 likes this. -
I was thinking the same thing, JT gets to Brady a couple of times, if it is a Brady Sammie with Wake on the other side...nice.
At first I did not like this offseason, I thought Irish was to placid when it came to some moves he could have made, but lately I've been warming up to it, I think moving Carey to RG tipped the scale for me, now we at least can mash people in the running game to generate offense.Ophinerated likes this.