http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/23/kurt-warner-rg3-tannehill-both-outplaying-luck/
Posting it from my phone but thought it was a pretty interesting. It sound like even amid the hype surrounding RG3 and Luck, Tannehill is starting to force his way into the conversation. Let's hope it continues!
-
I wouldn't say he has a worse supporting cast then Luck...
-
Well I've watched Lucks games, and I would still trade Peyton Manning to draft him and be as happy as ever..
It's good to hear, the compliments coming out after there is some NFL film on the guy...'enormously huge' upside gets me hyped, every time...lol -
In horse racing there are a lot of horses that start fast only to fade and be passed by the steady paced horses .
IMO its too early to come to any sort of judgement about the rookie QBs .
For instance Cam Newton set the world on fire last year.This year there is a lot of film on his tendencies and teams are shutting him down.
The question is can he evolve into a complete QB to overcome that.
Only time will tell. IMO Luck will eventually be better than RG3 .Hopefully Tanny will too . -
GreysonWinfield likes this.
-
-
Yea they also have a worse OL and RBs. You would take Avery over Bess???
Um no. Wayne yes. Fleener is probably a little better weapon then Fasano, but not by much right now. Tannehill has the better supporting cast right now. -
Outside of Reggie Wayne I disagree.
-
As much as I like to hear praise for Tannehill, this is silly. It's been two weeks. It's way too early to start anointing anyone as the best of anything.
-