I am often confounded by his play calling and his tendency to simply avoid the run all together for stretches of games for no apparent reason. Today we ran the ball 21 times for the game, which is simply not enough in my opinion. In the second half we ran the ball a total of 7 times, and includes the two point conversion. We had an 11 point lead going into the 4th quarter and we didn't really have a concerted effort to continue to run the ball in the second half of this game. Miller had 6 carries for 5 yards in the second half of this game. Lazor must in my view run the ball more often than 21 times in a game like this. We had a lead in this game and we needed to continue to shorten the game the game a bit by running the ball. Tannehill had 36 passes in the game or 63% of our combined rushing and passing snaps. We should have run the ball more than 7 times in the second half given our success with it in the first half. But, rather than continue to stick with that successful aspect of our offense we went in the other direction. The ground game must become more of equal partner in the offense. It just must. Lazor must grow as a play caller and utilize the run more often that he does if we wish to remain a competitive team and help protect leads that we have in games. Edit: People need to read what is said, not what they add to it or try to fit it into their preconceived ides of what is said. For anyone who said I am have blamed the offense for the loss, I'd love someone to quote some evidence of that.