Two of the biggest fantasy 'franchises' of all time.
One is a series of books that spawned a following an an expanded universe including the most recent hit movie series.
One is a series of movies that spawned its own following, including books and in it's own expanded universe.
LOTR, created by J R R Tolkien, taking inspiration from Norse mythology, created a world that has gone on to heavily influence the whole 'fantasy' setting in terms of orcs, warriors, wizards, elves, trolls etc. from other novels, to role playing games, and beyond, in addition to the LOTR universe/series itself which only seems to grow in popularity.
Star Wars, created by George Lucas, created a science fiction universe that seems to blend both the historical and the futuristic, the scientific and the spiritual, to create iconic characters and stories that still feature prominently in social imagery and language, as well as itself inspiring other works of science fiction beyond the Star Wars universe itself. Countless books, movies, TV series, and video games have been produced with the Star Wars label and continue to be produced without any signs of slowing down - quite the opposite.
In some ways the two franchises are quite different, in other quite similar.
There are lots of ways this can be approached so I don't want to limit it. I'll just ask, which one is better, Star Wars or The Lord of the Rings?
-
Lord of the Rings
Created a brand new genre. Prior to LOTR there was no wizards and goblins genre. You had King Arthur and the Viking Sagas and that was it for the most part. There is no Game of Thrones without LOTR.
Created a brand new language....Elvish.
Created not just LOTR a trilogy but the Hobbit and what a lot of fans enjoy the most The Silmarrillion, an entire history of the fabled land.
STAR WARS ....Stole 75% of the idea from Dune. The evil emperor, 1st book takes place on desert planet, the force is the same as the bene gesserit mental powers, the lead character a boy foretold in destiny. In fact the original scripts had warring noble families too from what I read
Jar, jar binksUnlucky 13 likes this. -
-
-
Star wars came out when I was 5 1/2, so arguably nothing has impacted my life more, with the exception of having kids. ON the other side, the first real book I ever picked up and read was the Hobbit (picked it off the shelf while sitting in detention hall in junior high) - also changed my life . Having said all that, hard to say LOTR isn't better. Both franchises have had such huge impacts on society as a whole.
-
Both are awesome, and both have been a big part of my life for a long time.
Similar to others, Star Wars has basically always been there to me. A New Hope came out a month before I was born, and my dad was a huge fan. Some of my earliest memories, from when I was about four or five years old, are sitting around the TV in the living room of the apartment we lived in, watching the original moves when they came on TV (years before we had a VHS). And then when VCRs became more prominent, it seemed like every time we went to a family gathering or my parents were hanging out with their friends, the adults would put the Star Wars movies on TV to occupy the kids, and I must have seen each one 50 times by the time I was ten.
LOTR was a different matter. My initial introduction to the series was watching the old animated movie, which also came out the same year that I was born. I saw that a handful of times as a kid, and eventually it inspired me to read my dad's copy of the book when I was about ten or eleven years old. That in turn lead me to read the three books of the LOTR series when I was about 12-14. And after that, I connected the dots that so many of the other fantasy books, comics, movies and video games that I was into got their ideas from Tolkien. His imagination was such an enormous resource for the whole genre.
I guess that if I had to pick which one was better, or more important to the world of media, it would be LOTR. However, I love both. I'll continue to eagerly look forward to all of the things that are being created for the Star Wars universe, and the LOTR series on Amazon might be enough to eventually convince my wife and I to join Prime. -
If you guys had to just pick one of the two to be able to re-watch/read or continue watching reading in terms of content that already exists or will exist - movies, books, series etc. and never the other one, which one would you choose?
-
I believe a better way to do it, is to come up with categories and see how they stack up versus each other. Like World Building, Story, Impact, Public Appeal, etc.
Absent that, I have to say, I just don't like the Tolkienverse. I appreciate it was first and I appreciate the obscene amounts of world building Tolkien did, but I just find the stories at best boring and at worst overwrought. Again, I know it was first but that doesn't make it the best automatically. I'm sure people liked the Model T, but it wasn't better than a 2019 BMW.
Star Wars is fun, LOTR feels like homework. -
I would put the original Tolkein works as probably the best overall in terms of being art, but as Fin D notes, they are heavy. Going past Tolkein, the movies too are huge and heavy. Great (well, not the Hobbit fiasco), but long and heavy. You have to be in a mood or really dedicate yourself to reading or watching.
With Star Wars I'll toss it on the TV and just go any time. My three year old saw them and loves the robots, and asks to watch it every so often now and it's one of the few I will actively watch with him (as opposed to yet another viewing of Kung Fu Panda, WallE or Toy Story).
The books as well - I'll go to the library and just grab a few SW books. They aren't high art works of literary genius, but they are quick, fun and easy reads. I also just like the expansiveness of the SW universe. Theres so much to choose from or go with. -
To choose which one is better, I would choose Lord of the Rings. It is an amazing accomplishment and doesn't contain the Prequels or Rogue One. -
Star Wars is such a rich and varied universe it lends itself to vast possibilities and imagination. I've also enjoyed many of the games in the series that are generally well made.
However, if I had to choose just one I think I'd end up going for LOTR purely because of the depth of quality even just in the books. They're incredibly well written, and also profound. So more than just pure entertainment, I think long term LOTR would be more satisfying because it is of a higher and deeper quality. I could enjoy reflecting deeply on the material, beyond just the saga itself. -
LOTR went on and on and on and on and on...oh good God already, get to freaking Mordor, dump the ring and call it a day.
At least Star Wars, and that does include the substandard prequels didn’t take forever to get from “here” to “there” -
Now, when I happen to watch them on TV, I always feel like so much has been cut out because the extened ones are what I think of as being the default, complete ones.Ohio Fanatic and adamprez2003 like this. -
LotR other big problem is the same problem with Harry Potter, and that is the Deus Ex Machina problem.
I mean forget the unbeatable ghost army in LotR, but every single side quest was only constructed to add steps to the plot of go from A to B, throw ring in lava. -
Fin D likes this.
-
I think what's overlooked here a bit is how much of an impact the special effects had at the time for STAR WARS. That and the visuals (costumes, sets,etc). I was around 10 when the movie cane out and I can tell you, you literally heard wows and ohhhs at the premier. Seeing that movie was like flying in a jet for the first time as opposed to a prop plane. No-one had ever done space battles like that before. The light sabers which were nothing more than the traditional sword fight got ooohs and ahhhhhs. Even the costumes, face it Darth Vader and the stormtroopers just looked cool as hell. I think to some extent that was George lucas's real genius. He foresaw how important the next generation of special effects were going to be to the future of movies. All the companies he formed for special effects and sound may be his greatest legacy
Unlucky 13 likes this. -
I also remember oos and awws during the Lord of the Rings as well. -
-
The movie would cut out too much of the story. Props to Peter Jackson and the studios for staying as true as possible to the book.
The special effects wouldn't be able to capture the vision of Tolkien. Props to the CGI team. Everything looked believable.
The last fear was the would kidify the movie to sell toys to kids the way Star Wars started to kidify with Return Of the Jedi. Thank God the studios let Peter Jackson stay true to the bookDol-Fan Dupree likes this. -
I wasn't alive or old enough for the original trilogy, but I remember being pretty well awed watching them as a little kid - I loved the scene in EpIV when Han and Luke shoot down the TIE fighters as they escape.
LOTR was definitely a visually astounding movie. Probably the only one growing up that wowed me more was Jurassic Park.Fin D likes this. -
I was the same way in the later 90s, when I first read that people were talking about making a LOTR movie. I was excited and facinated and giddy, but others were really cynical and said that it would turn out so poorly that people would wish that it was never made. But again, it turned out wonderfully! -
For me the stake in the heart that kills Star Wars is The Last Jedi. I know a number of life long Star Wars fans who bailed out of the franchise after that movie.
There’s nothing like that in Tolkein’s books, where something kills your passion for the series. Yes the Simarillion and Unfinished Tales are heavy going, but they’re optional extras. -
Within the context of the overall story of the LOTR and the former generations, kings, battles etc. and Aragorn as a 'returning king' the involvement of such an army finding a sort of redemption fits well with the narrative and themes without it seeming like a deus ex machina. -
-
-
i had no problem with the Hobbit trilogy. Don't know anyone who complained even
-
George Lucas very shrewdly negotiated himself the rights to merchandising everything and he got 100% I believe. It seems with Return of the Jedi Lucas turned Star Wars into more of a marketing tool to sell his toys then a serious attempt at furthering the story. Can't blame him. He probably made more money from merchandising then the films themselves. Ewoks, then later Jar Jar Binks, it just started to get to Kiddy City. It just felt like instead of targeting the fifteen year old which I think the first two movies did he started targeting the eight year old with every movie after
-
Lucas has said several times since the 90s that the original movies were intended to appeal to 12 year old boys, and was honestly surprised that adults liked them as much as they did and took them so seriously.
adamprez2003 likes this. -
I know Solo is seen as proof however I don't see it that way. A Harrisonless Han Solo movie does not sound interesting to me. Especially after they fired Lord and Miller though I do recognize I am in the minority on that.
While the Last Jedi was a disappointment to some it still was 8th all time domestic and 11th world wide. -
I almost discount the prequels as being in the SWverse, they feel so different and just ... not good. I do, however, enjoy some of the novels in that timeframe, and the animated show was fun.Dol-Fan Dupree and Unlucky 13 like this. -
I thought that Solo was entertaining, and fine. I won't likely be thinking much about it in ten years, but a movie doesn't need to be one of the greatest things ever created to be enjoyable.
adamprez2003 and texanphinatic like this.