http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000...ould-be-a-positive?module=HP11_headline_stack Wherever Andrew Luck winds up in the NFL, the Stanford quarterback put to bed the notion that he's unwilling to coexist with an established veteran passer. "I'm sure it would be a positive," Luck told The Baltimore Sun on Friday. "I'm sure it would all work out, whatever the situation is." In an interview last week, Archie Manning hinted that his son, Peyton, and Luck would not want to play on the same team. One reason for that was Luck's ability to play right away, according to Archie. On the latter point, Luck seemed to agree.
Not buying it. He's saying all the right things now. But it will change once the Colts are guaranteed to have Manning back and starting. Then we'll see what Luck saying when he is looking at sitting the bench for the next few years.
Luck is a master of saying the right things and being politically correct. With the way everything players say and do is over analyzed, what else is he really supposed to say? I think he'll end up starting under center from day one in Indianapolis or wherever else he might end up.
The guy is on Robot mode, with a quick switch I think.. If I'am polian, I select Andrew Luck, he literally corrupted the game for this talent, and a 36 year old QB with a fused neck is his alibi.. Our only chance is that Luck will not want to come between them for fear of disrespecting Manning..Maybe he wants a team that is far away from that drama..That's all we can do, is hope, and be ready to pounce with the best offer.
If I were Ross, one of my single ladie minority owners including J-LO, would be on a little secret mission called cougar huntin. Hear that Andrew, have your pick.. seriously, I would give it all up, just like I bet 25 or so teams are willing to do.
