Hey, Found this article about the top 10 at most offenseive positions, and the top 10 defenders. No Ronnie Brown? That means he is below 91? WTF? Anyways, they also have the biggest shakers. Deangelo Hall, -27, I love it. Enjoy; http://www.gamespot.com/sports/blog...om_act=convert&om_clk=picks&tag=picks;title;3
Albert Haynesworth being the best defender in lame and so is Ronnie Brown not being rated in the top ten running backs.
Ok I guess I somewhat get the Ronnie Brown rating (Actually no WTF). However Matt Cassel an 83? He was just franchised and had a remarkable year! I don't agree with the DeAngelo Hall rating either. He played pretty well for the Redskins.
I thought they mentioned in one of their blogs they were changing the way players were rated so that they wouldnt be rated so highly? hmmm... anyone else remember that? Or am i thinking something completely different...
you are not. just because a player is rated lower than what you would normally see does not mean that he won't actually be better than he was. - that was a horrible sentence. forget previous years ratings. they're doing it differently this year. that is better. that's how it's supposed to shake out anyway.
I'm sure I've asked this a billion times but I can't seem to remember; are they making Madden 10 for PS2?
You guys aren't missing much. Personally I think the next gen Maddens are terrible (at least 09 that I played). I play Madden 07 on the PS2 and I am happy enough.