Marshall traded to the Jets

LeverGe for Harvin? Harvin is gone lol they have Decker and Marshall. Harvin isnt a jet any longer.

Rumor that the Jets traded the swapped picks with Eagles and get Foles? any one else hear that

"JDelenne wrote:

Rumor that the Jets traded the swapped picks with Eagles and get Foles? any one else hear that

Still rumor as far as I can tell.

"JDelenne wrote:

Rumor that the Jets traded the swapped picks with Eagles and get Foles? any one else hear that

Not scared of Foles. One year wonder w/Chip Kelly's offense leading the way. Though, Marshall (albeit an older version) and Decker are nice duo to pair with any QB.

"Clark Kent wrote:

Not scared of Foles. One year wonder w/Chip Kelly's offense leading the way. Though, Marshall (albeit an older version) and Decker are nice duo to pair with any QB.

How can the Eagles make that trade now with no guarantee that Mariotta will be available at #6? The only way that deal happens is on draft day with the Jets on the clock and Mariotta still available. As far as Foles goes, he would make the Jets better just like Marshall does. It will be interesting to see how it plays out if Mariotta is still available when the Jets pick.

Still dont get the hate on Foles. He's looked better than Tannehill so far.

"Vertical Limit wrote:

LeverGe for Harvin? Harvin is gone lol they have Decker and Marshall. Harvin isnt a jet any longer.

all they need is to trade for Cutler now. Have all disgruntled ex-Broncos.

"Vertical Limit wrote:

Still dont get the hate on Foles. He's looked better than Tannehill so far.

No, he had one really good season. don't make generalizations about a whole career, as short as it has been

"Ohio Fanatic wrote:

No, he had one really good season. don't make generalizations about a whole career, as short as it has been

AndTannehill has had one okay year.

"Vertical Limit wrote:

AndTannehill has had one okay year.

there's a difference in my opinion. Foles had a very good year, but he's already come back down to earth and looks below average. that's why Kelly likely has interest in trading up to get Mariotta.
Tannehill had a good year (calling it okay is wrong), so he has just as much of a chance to have another good year which would already make him more consistent than Foles. If Tannehill regresses next year, then you can spew the cynicism some more.

Right now the jest have a better coach and better receivers.

"Ohio Fanatic wrote:

there's a difference in my opinion. Foles had a very good year, but he's already come back down to earth and looks below average. that's why Kelly likely has interest in trading up to get Mariotta.
Tannehill had a good year (calling it okay is wrong), so he has just as much of a chance to have another good year which would already make him more consistent than Foles. If Tannehill regresses next year, then you can spew the cynicism some more.

You do realize he was on pace to best RT in yards and come up 1 TD short last year, albeit with more interceptions......I don't think he is washed by any means and is a VAST improvement over Smith.....

So much for all of KB's huffing and puffing about how coaches hate Brandon Marshall. Todd Bowles seems to have a positive enough impression from both men's time with the Dolphins.