Sounds good to me... Link: http://www.palmbeachpost.com/dolphi...ins_notebook.html?cxtype=rss&cxsvc=7&cxcat=46
So he has one good game on Kick returns and he is GOD. NO NO NO NO NO... Why cant we admit he is a not A WR. We should focus on him returning kicks thats his talent thats what he should be focusing on
Yes because without him we had our best performance by WRs yet. He's our best WR. There ain't no sniffing it any other way. 3 dropped passes, yes concentration issue, but he was open 3 times. I can't even say that for our whole WR corps on Sunday.
I think the whole starter thing is overblown. We carry what? 4 active receivers on game day. I think it was to send him a message, he still gets to play alot of snaps.
Unfortunately he is still our best WR. He is still the best and only guy that can stretch the field, draw the #1 CB, draw over the top coverage and create space for our running game and other receivers.
cause hartline proved he doesnt have elite speed and Bess proved that everyone drops passes. (although fumbling twice is a huge knock on bess altogether) Ginn is our best wr. that may not be saying much, but he is.
I'd rather threw a 20 yard pass to Ginn that he might drop than a pass to Bess for 3 yards. (unless it's 3rd and 2 or course.)
You are upset our coach said that any player who shows consistent good play is going to get time? Unless you think that ONLY Cam and Hartline should see the field you are going to have a hard time convincing me anyone deserves playing time over Ginn.
Good point, but also remember we usually employ a 1 WR or 2 WR set. The only time the non-starter will see playing time is for the roughly 15 reps when we actually use 3 WRs. Therefore, Ginn essentially doubles his playing time, in and around, by being slated as the starter.
No sir.Because he wasn't our WR during the game against the Jets our ST exploded for there greatest performance in team(and almost) NFL history. It depends on how you twist it....
