Nat Moore says receiving corps has ‘chemistry’

Thanks,

Us Ginn advocates have been saying exactly that for some time now. Maybe those points will hold more ground out of Nat Moore's mouth.

Actually, around here, mabye not...... :)

As far as I'm concerned, if Nat Moore says something about playing the receiver position, chances are he knows more than most of us. The guy was and is a doctor of routology. And what can anyone possibly say about Marino? It's not like he's been sucking up since his retirement -- he's always told it straight, on his program and off. You have to feel better when those two say they like what they see.

There is certainly a lot of truth to what Moore is saying. That's why I'd prefer to draft a receiver, bring him in with the understanding of our offensive philosophy, and let him blend with it. Bringing in a higher profile guy who has been in the league who might have a bit of an "I'm the guy" ego could harm the chemistry. IE: Coles.

Most of what Nat said has been echoed around here already, nice to see someone with some inside insight agree with some of us about Ginn's value as a Dolphin.

Here's some more of Nat talking about Parcells & co. and the new direction of the Dolphins. Regardless of what he'd say, he's always been one of my favorite Phins. :D

http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/41375

Chemistry is great, but production is better!

Another question about what Nat said (And don't get me wrong, he is one of my all time favorites!) but is he in camp and at all the games and practices? How does he know they have Chemistry?

"NJFINSFAN1 wrote:

Chemistry is great, but production is better!

Another question about what Nat said (And don't get me wrong, he is one of my all time favorites!) but is he in camp and at all the games and practices? How does he know they have Chemistry?

Chemistry=Wins...Wins>production....

Just saying Im fine with three 750yard Wr's as opposed to one 1,000 yard guy.

Name me the number one guy in any of bill parcells championship runs?