Was I the only one literally SCREAMING at the TV for the refs not calling PI on the Ravens on that bomb to TG in the endzone . . . . it was double coverage but it was thrown PERFECTLY and it definitely was pass interference. Horrible no-call . . . karma when the FG was missed and the Ravens being short at the 1 yard line.
Tags:
-
it was a horrible no-call....
it would have given us a first-and-goal at the 1 yard line...... although given Cam's playcalling and our red-zone offense, we probably would have had to settle for a FG anyway.
plays like that are exactly what have been ailing us all year..... nothing ever seems to fall our way. we are the anti-patriots. -
last week Lemon was brutally slammed to the turf and there was no flag
I hate these refs -
Gado and LBook have played well for us, Gado has what 3 td's in 2 games? Did Ronnie ever do that for us this year?
It was a bad call, if we look at the FG drive for us, Ted Ginn returned the ball to the 48, we drove down the field, and took the lead.
Not for nothing do I think Ginn is a playmaker for us. -
Definitely a year where the penalties don't come for us when we need them to (or like in Ted Ginn's returns they are fluke penalties). . . . when Camarillo went into the endzone I was more shocked that there wasn't a flag for something rather than him scoring lol. -
It was a horrible non call, as was the non call on Boller for grounding early in the game.
-
-
The call that really got my goat was the "Spiking is not a penalty" non call, we got burned badly by one or two of those calls this year, one by Schulters, the other way back against the Redskins by JT(?).
Not a big fan of "blame the refs" this game stands out plainly as very poorly clled game, even when we won the darn thing. -
The non-call on Boller is what ticked me off though. How could it NOT be intentional grounding when the ball was thrown into the turf like a lawn dart in FRONT of J Taylor who was IN BETWEEN the QB and the alleged receiver? That was BS, plain and simple. -
-
Last edited: Dec 17, 2007
-
To be honest, I thought we were going to get called for PI when Daniels was all over the Ravens receiver in the endzone. Daniels never even turned around, he simply threw his hand up. But the camera angle could have been very deceiving. -
And that is problem with Ronnie in a nutshell, we can talk about what he "did" not what he is going to do. -
Ronnie IMO is a top 5 All Around Back . . . he can run, catch, block and pass protect with the best of them . . . but the injuries (whether freak or not) are a concern, I dunno man, I'm hoping for the best . . . but its not looking good . . . this is a big year comming up for Ronnie . . . its the 4th of 5 in his contract, and will most likely decide whether we resign him or trade him.
-
-
Running Backs almost never allow themselves to approach 29 yrs old without a "new" contract, but Ronnie is just so all around we almost have to resign him or use our #1 pick on his replacement.
It's a decision that I'm glad I don't have to make.