our work begins @ home with the resigning of Garner & Incognito
with free-agent offensive linesmen
1) Ryan Kalil - 25 (Panthers) 6'2" 295lbs is the right man @ center
2) Logan Mankins- 28 (Patriots) - LG would cost a pick & some money but is a sure thing
3) Jeremy Trueblood - 26 (TB) 6'9" 330lbs can provide competition & could start either side. both our Tackles are dinged up.
the draft:
1) Mike Pouncey, C/G, Florida: possesses good size at 6-foot-4, 310 pounds and has the versatility to play any of the three interior line positions. late first-round to early second-round prospect.
2) Derek Sherrod, OT, Mississippi State: excellent size & skills @ 6'6", 311lbs
3) Stefen Wisniewski, Center, Penn State: (6-foot-3, 305 pounds), intelligent, tough and plays with instinct & technique.
4) Danny Watkins, G/C,Baylor: the oldest prospect in the draft @ 26 (6-foot-4, 312 pounds) a top guard prospect
if we're not going after the best QB in the draft, then the offensive line should be rebuilt this season.
we really have to get the offensive line right in 2011. I understand the difficulties in acquiring any of these players in the draft or free agency, however, if the offensive line is the priority we should be able to find a way to pick up a Center & LG, perhaps a Tackle.
Tags:
-
-
mankins got tagged.
-
Friend Gish: Each team is allowed to designate one of their players who is going to become a unrestricted free agent with the 'franchise tag'. An unrestricted free agent is a player whose contract has expired and is free to negotiate with any team without his present team having the opportunity to match the contract negotiated between the player and the other team. There are two types of franchise tag ... exclusive and non-exclusive:
Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_NFL_franchise_tag#ixzz1Ei4RNs24
I believe he's tagged non-exclusive, which means he's available to negotiate
Read more: http://www.fox28.com/Global/story.asp?S=14029457Pandarilla likes this. -
Pandarilla and Ohio Fanatic like this.
-
I don't know what we have to give up for him. I know it won't come cheap but it might not be as bad as you think. the patriots also have to negotiate a contract with Matt Light this year. Mankins is a ProvenBull & an answer @ LG.
all these players are long-shots. nothing ventured nothing gained. a lot of it will be about priorities & the offensive line should be the priority in 2011 -
gunn34 and finsbuck719 like this. -
if you're right & there is no negotiating a lesser exchange, then he's obviously not worth it. all I know for sure is that he's unhappy in NE & they have other problems on the offensive line to consider in 2011 with Matt Light & finding a stronger starting Center for the up-coming season.
-
Technically, to make the trade a team is entitled to 2 first round picks for a franchised player but, and here is where it gets a bit cloudy.
When NE put the franchise tag on Cassel it was a common thought around the league that if someone wanted Cassel bad enough they would have to pick up the 14 million dollar salary and give up 2 first round picks. Instead, NE traded Cassel to Kansas City and also sent them Vrabel for what ? Kansas City gave up their second round pick, 34th overall for both Cassel and Vrabel. I then would have to take this as evidence that infact 2 first round picks in trade for a franchised player is not , by any means, written in stone.the 23rd likes this. -
I've only listed players I thought were a quality solution to our offensive line dilemma that are available in the draft & free agency, players that would start & would get the job done right. everything is a matter of pick & treasure. like I said: a lot depends on where the priority is going to be in the draft & you never know who will fall in the rankings. as far as free agency goes, that too, is subject to change & negotiation.
-
-
-
-
we need immediately a pro-bowl or pro-bowl potential Center, Left Guard & a possible Tackle to compete for the start & add depth on the offensive line. I submitted a list of those possibilities in both Free Agency & the Draft. its always a matter of money, of picks, of needs, its all about negotiation.
-
-
everything begins up front:
if the offensive line gets the push on the defensive trench
the running game sets up & the opposition defense responds by moving up
when that happens, the passing game opens
& our defense stays off the field, allowing them to enter the game fresh -
gunn34, dolfan22 and mommabilly like this.
-
1) the GB offensive line was underrated
2) an offensive line moves as one. timing & understanding are paramount
3) their collective quality was of obviously superior or they wouldn't have gone to the SuperBowl
4) they had a QB that was a constant threat, anywhere on the field, which improved the play of the offensive line -
a QB cannot survive without a quality offensive line. Peyton Manning, Rogers, Ben Roethlisberger, whoever would not have taken us to the SuperBowl playing behind the 2010 dolphin offensive line.
as far as out-dated goes, not to worry, football 101 will never be deleted from the play book. the basics are exactly that, the basics. everything else is embellishment or trends based on adaptation to phenomenal personal abilities. these things come & go. as long as we play football, it will always begin in the trenches. -
Think of this.
http://m.packers.com/news/headlines/2011/02/508d9936-db8d-4e4c-b2b0-c49d5fd64b70/
Despite what you say about the importance of winning in the trenches, history proves otherwise. Take this Super Bowl for example...
mommabilly likes this. -
C'mon Gish, stop making sense. People said the same thing about Az Oline, way underated when they beat everyone in the playoffs and made the Superbowl. In 2010, that same exact Oline, minus Kurt Warner, sucked in fans opinions. LOL Same guys, with exception now they had Faneca at LG, same RBs same coach but no Warner. FAIL
Been saying it for years and years, Its the QB and believe me, I was not heavy on the fact when they changed you cannot bang a WR around until he gets the ball. I also firmly believe , our offensive line coach Blows. I would wager not if but when he gets fired, he is not going to find a job as the lead offensive line coach anywhere in the NFL, I can almost guarantee it. There were many times it looked like the Right side of the Oline had no clue what the left side was doing and what bugged me the most about Berger, beyond his blocking ( good or bad ) 70% of the time Berger had no clue of what was going on and who was doing what on that offensive line.
Line play is designed in such a way if there is one Olineman that does not do his job, the other 4 pay for it. Well, I am not privy to the Line set ups but can tell you that many many times, Mr. Berger had no clue if he was to go left, right or stay put, many times. Perhaps it was not even his fault but the way he has been trained. Add to that there was a rookie at RG to start off and lets face it, it was more then evident he was not quite ready yet for the NFL stage. This was prior to his illness popping up.GISH likes this. -
-
Guest
-
Guest
Aaron Rodgers' offensive line was a sieve in '09 and he put up similar statistics in '10 with an improved line. What made them so much better was their continuing improvement on the defensive side of the ball, in my opinion.
Manning, on the other hand, may be a different story. He never really had a bad offensive line and he's not as mobile as the others.
That's why many, including myself, are for drafting a mobile quarterback; to make up for the shortcomings of our offensive line. -
Our offensive line was pretty damn good in pass pro last season.
-
texanphinatic and GISH like this.
-
-
-
-
Friend Gish:
from the get-go I leave open the possibility
for going after the QB in this draft
Luck would be one of those QB's
in my opinion, you bet the house on in the 2012 draft
don't know if we have that QB-quality available in 2011
what I said was in an attempt to open a conversation
on offensive line possibilities, which I see
as one of the most important things to fix on the offense
as they go: OL, QB, RB whatever is available
using pro-bowl/franchise potential players -
texanphinatic likes this.
-
contrary, argumentative, whatever...
simple truth is, everybody has an opinion
& most can base it in a philosophy or statistics
coached to support their argument.
a quick catchy-statement is always a way to score points
& distract but it doesn't answer the question
the thread I started was an attempt to open a conversation
on offensive line possibilities, which I see
as the primary target on the offensive fix list
only makes sense, you need a base to build on
& the foundation of football has always been the trench
argue the point if you choose to do so
however
the reason for the thread was to discuss possible resolutions
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/02/23/2080253/draft-might-not-fill-miami-dolphins.html
no QB, Running Back or WR would have taken us
to the Superbowl in 2010 playing behind our Offensive Line
this is a simple reality we must face & fix for 2011 -
Stefen Wisniewski @ Center, Penn State: (6-foot-3, 305 pounds), intelligent, tough and plays with instinct & technique.
Danny Watkins, @ G/C,Baylor: the oldest prospect in the draft @ 26 (6-foot-4, 312 pounds) a top guard prospect
would due just fine for a start. doable? -
Brett Romberg, Miami. won Rimmington award. played on several national championship teams, was a can't miss guy. Spent his career mostly as Practice squad or backup and was cut in 2010 by Atlanta. Donovan Raiola, brother of Dominic Raiola,starting center for Detroit, winner of Rimmington award ( best center in college football ) Great career at Wisconsin was to be a chip off the old block of his brother Dominic. Did not even get drafted, spent most of career on practice squads and last few years, mostly summer camp material.
Centers are not a slam dunk perfect yes they will work out scenario in the NFL. -
Friend mommabilly:
agreed & that's what makes the situation absolutely urgent. got a slew of talented linesmen in the draft that should become available. I think Mike Pouncey could possibly fall to the third round if we were interested in his services. we've all seen it happen before & there is the added weight of a very talented, defense-heavy draft to facilitate the fall of any offensive player this year.
just some that could fall to us in varying levels of the draft in no particular order:
Danny Watkins, @ G/C/T,Baylor: the oldest prospect in the draft @ 26 (6-foot-4, 312 pounds) a top guard prospect
would due just fine for a start. doable?
Kristofer O'Dowd, Center, USC
Height: 6-4. Weight: 303.
Projected 40 Time: 5.07.
Stefen Wisniewski, Center/Guard, Penn State
Height: 6-3. Weight: 298.
Projected 40 Time: 5.13.
Will Rackley, Guard, Lehigh
Height: 6-4. Weight: 310.
Projected 40 Time: 5.27.
Marcus Cannon, Guard/Tackle, TCU
Height: 6-6. Weight: 350.
Projected 40 Time: 5.34.
George Bryan, TE, N.C. State
Height: 6-5. Weight: 265.
Projected 40 Time: 4.77.
Zach Pianalto, TE, North Carolina
Height: 6-4. Weight: 250.
Projected 40 Time: 4.85.
most FreeAgency ProvenBulls will probably cost a an arm & a leg, but you never know how a negotiation will go. going with a veteran takes the guess work out of the equation.
Ryan Kalil (Panthers) would definitely get the job done @ center, if attainable.
depending on the physical abilities of Alan Faneca, @ 34 would bring much needed experience to the offensive line. he's a proven bull & maybe has another year or two to play. he might be had reasonably @ this point in his career.
Tampa's Jeremy Trueblood @ 6'9" 330lbs would provide serious competition & like Carey could start either side, a consideration with both our Tackles dinged up. -
I would not personally draft anyone from Baylor. Jason Smith, the number two overall pick in 2009 that was to replace Orlando Pace could not even beat out the back up at RT in his first year. Last year he was put at LT and beat out by Roger Saffold, a second round pick. Baylor is about the worst football program on the planet earth. Good school, football program SUCKS.
-
-
Just because you declare it a fact, doesnt mean its true.