Mr C, I learned a long time ago never to take offense. As for the 12 angry men example, that bolsters what I'm saying. One man saw the evidence differently and stuck to the conclusion they drew no matter if 11 others were saying he was quite wrong, that is the nature of eyewitness testimony.
Juror 8, Henry Fonda, refused to simply take the eyewitness testimony at face value. He eventually got all the others to agree with him, when they analyzed it further. You were speaking favorably about eyewitness testimony in your previous post. I fail to see how the example of 12 Angry Men bolsters your previous comment.
I guess this basically ends this discussion, because it appears to have gotten off track to the point I have no idea what you are talking about now.
