Tannenbaum. Splash. Destiny
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
-
-
This is the corner he wanted
Revis, Howard and Jones. Not bad
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Yeah for a bad team. The question is will he be suspended
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Paying for a name instead of talent is a sure fire way to destroy the team. Revis used to be great. He isn't even good anymore and he's afraid to even tackle.
jboogie likes this. -
-
-
We already have our starters for the year, I doubt we cut Max because of the 5 mil dead cap, and we won't be paying him 8.5 mil to sit on the bench, and we don't need him to be a 1 year progress stopper for X.
So whats the point? Certainly not a 1 year prove it deal so we can then sign him to a multi year deal at 33, that's not going to happen, and an incentive laden contract for a back up CB? How does that make sense for him to sign?
I see no end game to signing Revis unless he's willing to take a back up salary.Puka-head likes this. -
this is garbage.
He is done and quit on two of his last three teams. let him soak up someone elses playing time.
STOP BEING OBSESSED WITH NAMES. Successful teams dont keep bringing in ashed up reclamation projects. They draft well and shrewdly target young under-utilized, developing talent.Finster likes this. -
Would much rather sign someone young and hungry.
-
Look at it this way- both Moore and Tannehill torched him this season...they both targeted Revis on 3rd downs. That's really all anyone needs to know about Revis's conditioning and ability at 31.