I've seen a few guys here clamouring for him. I watch UT vs A&M last night. Color me unimpressed. Maybe he just had a bad game, but he was inaccurate, displayed poor decision making, didn't have great pocket presence. I want nothing to do with him come April.
Page 1 of 3
-
-
-
Tannehill was a WR at A&M a few years ago. He's extremely athletic, and very raw still. To say Kellen Moore has more upside is widely false.
Aquafin likes this. -
-
I don't think Tannehill can come and start and play well right away. He's far to raw still. However a 5'10 1/2 no arm QB has more petential then a 6'4 220 lb strong arm QB that is new to the QB position? You can believe it all you want, doesn't make it any less false.
-
-
Hence why its called....potential?
-
-
Why are you bringing Henne up? I thought Henne was a 4th rounder at best, you don't have to convince me on how bad that pick was
-
I still think we should sign/trade for Matt Flynn. He possess just as much upside as any QB in the draft no named Andrew Luck or Matt Barkley, but with less cost. -
Tannehill is not as good of a qb as Weeden in fact the kid from Kansas State who's name escapes now is a better qb for what Miami does.
-
Of course my opinion of Tannehill is merely from my observations of him in the few games I have seen him play. He may turn out to be a productive player in the NFL or he may not. I just don't feel that the Dolphins are in a situation where they can risk drafting a QB who they will have to try and develop over a number of years. He certainly would not be ready to take over the offense immediately. He would be better suited for a team who has an established QB and where he could sit and learn the position in the NFL for two or three seasons. If he has this opportunity, he just might develop into a solid starter down the road. The Dolphins just don't have the right situation to draft a Tannehill right now because they can not afford to draft a QB who will not be ready to play for several more years.
I believe Luck will be ready to play immediately. Griffin and Barkley should be starters sometime in the 2012 NFL season and Jones may have sit and observe for a year before he is ready to be the starter for an NFL team. All the other QB's in the NFL draft will need a few years to become starters, if they ever do actually become starters.
I am not a big fan of the Dolphins trading for Flynn. While he looked okay last year when he stepped in as a replacement for Rogers with the Packers. I just don't see him as a solid starter in the NFL.
In fact I think he would not be an upgrade over Matt Moore. If the Dolphins can get Flynn for a 7th round draft pick, it would be worth the risk. I just wouldn't want them to give up a lower draft pick for what I consider a very mediocre QB in the NFL. -
He's got 1000 yards rushing and 1500 yards passing ... and a ridiculous 25 TDs rushing. There's no way he is going to declare for the draft as a Junior, which is a good thing because he's still very much a work in progress as a passer. -
Tannehill is an outstanding prospect who possesses all the tools and abilities (including mental) to become a franchise QB.
Respectfully, anyone judging him on one game is acting silly :tongue2:, and it's equally as silly to judge him as if he's supposed to be a finished product. If Ryan were currently as polished as Barkley or Luck, we'd be talking about him as the potential #2 pick in the draft, and dare I say #1. -
FWIW, NFLdraftScout (CBS) now has Tannehill rated ahead of Landry Jones, so the posters who have been "clamoring for him" aren't completely off their rocker.
MrClean likes this. -
Both are not all that impressive.
-
Kellen Moore in the 2nd round?????
That would be bad. -
-
All I can do is go by what I see. And I have not seen anything that would make me want the Dolphins to draft him with a top 10-12 pick. -
I'd rather sign Matt Flynn than draft Jones or Tannehill in that range. For that matter Griffin isn't even all that great of a prospect. Barkley-Luck sure. The rest of these guys just don't impress me.
PSG likes this. -
However, Griffin does intrigue me a bit. Although I'm not convinced his game will translate to the NFL. -
finfansince72 Season Ticket Holder Club Member
I don't see us taking Tannehill in the first round, I think he's more of a target if we are picking in a bad position to get a 1st round Qb and don't have enough to trade up. I would think he's a guy we might target in the 2-4th rounds if we miss out on the 1st round talent. He is extremely raw and I think would be a pretty good Qb to be grooming behind Moore for a year or so. He's not a bad fall back option IMO.
-
Guest
ToddsPhins and MikeHoncho like this. -
ToddsPhins likes this.
-
But sometimes I get the feeling in the NFL he will have a tendency to want to use his legs first. I wonder if he will have the patience and pocket presence to be a QB who can run or just be a running QB.
But let me clear, I like RG3. Alot. In fact he probably either #2 or #3 in my QB list. -
I'm just saying he not my top choice. Or second or third or forth...... -
-
I simply wonder if he will naturally want to use his legs everytime there is a little bit of pressure instead of trying to stand tall in the pocket. -
Not even close. Simply pointing out the natural knee-jerk reaction to any black QB coming out of college (where his athleticism is perceived —accurately or inaccurately— before any other trait). You have got to see film on this kid. He's a passer.
PSG and ToddsPhins like this. -
Heck, if we're going by "talent" & brains alone, he's a top 5 pick IMO. He just needs some quality nurturing.
I'll take him 100 out of 100 times over Jake Locker whom we all know was drafted in the top 10. -
IMO there will knowingly be enough teams smitten with Tannehill's upside that it will force one of their hands to grab him early out of fear of losing him, so I'd be shocked if he makes it to 20, and I wouldn't be surprised if he went top 10. He's a natural passer with a live arm, good balance & coordination, athleticism, quick feet, and great intelligence, so I don't foresee any reason why he won't be able to sure up his mechanics & footwork to give his game that needed consistency.
IMO he's some experience & good coaching away from being a game-changing QB in the right offense surrounded by the right personnel.
I'd take a flier on Moore in the 6th. Why not?MrClean likes this. -
If we're going to have a lights-out defense, would you prefer an athletic, playmaking QB like Griffin or Tannehill to keep the pressure on defenses?.... or would you prefer an outstanding game-manager like Barkley?MrClean likes this. -
I will make a point to watch the kid some more. -
Luck
Barkley
Griffin
Weeden
Jones
Cousins
Foles
Tannehill
With the exception of Luck that order is subject to change. -
PSG likes this.
-
-
-
Guest
Page 1 of 3