What is this move all about ?
It reeks of a head coach that is trying to save his job. Its not about vision or the future, but purely selfish by the Head Coach.
So much for the FO preaching team, and what's best for the franchise. This is all about Tony Sparano, and his keeping his job, make no other assumption than that.
Page 1 of 2
-
-
-
-
His response is "We can win more if the play of the quarterback improves marginally."
What is abmirable is that he did not say it to you, me, or the media. He just made the move. 52 guys that come to work everyday appreciate that fact.Ricky Williams, Phins28, Stringer Bell and 5 others like this. -
Dol-Fan Dupree likes this.
-
It's about having the balls to say your QB just ain't cutting it.That it's time to make a change.
Now if you want to talk about the O-line shuffle.......Miguel likes this. -
The future is crumbling and people are embracing this move backwards.
Seems idiotic as hell to me.
Where does Pennington take you? To the playoffs :lol:
No way in hell.
This is going to be a disaster.DolfanJake and Rick 1966 like this. -
Of course he wants to save his job. I honestly believe that he feels pennington gives us the best chance to go to the playoffs. We'll see. I have a feeling this move could either be genius or awful. Lets hope its not awful.
-
Even if Penny wins us games I hate this move.Zod likes this. -
-
-
-
dolfan32323 likes this.
-
-
DolfanJake likes this.
-
-
-
Even if Sparano thinks Henning is the problem, it still makes sense to put Penny in for the quick fix and deal with the larger issues in the off season. Personally, I don't think QB play was our (biggest) problem, but if you're gonna go down, go down with no rounds left in the chamber and it seems like that's what Sparano is doing. -
It's about winning NOW. It's always about winning right now No competitor wants any part of sacrificing wins now for wins in the future. Even more so in a league where the average career is roughly 5 years.
I've even read or heard over the years fans who are okay with losing now if it means (potentially) winning in the future.
However the people actually involved, ie: players, coaches, etc, all want to win now, because for them there may not be a "later".
As for Sparano thinking in terms of saving his job,that sort of falls under the "No S**t category". Of course he realizes that he's in a results oriented career. They all are.
IMO it's sort of important to remember that we as fans have a different perspective than they do. But at the end of the day we all want to see the team win.Layfield likes this. -
-
...........and if we go into next year with Henne as the starter, I can see myself supporting that move too. This isn't the end of his career. It's the end of his on the job training. He doesn't need anymore on the job training anyway. He needs to learn how a PRO can single handedly win a game.adamprez2003 likes this. -
-
Sparano made the right decision. I just hope he didn't wait too long to make it.
-
Mark Bulger was a damn good quarterback from 2002-2006 before injuries got to him.
http://www.nfl.com/players/marcbulger/careerstats?id=BUL162264
If Chad Henne turns out to be Mark Bulger part 2, we are in pretty damn good shape. -
If it's about being fired, it's the owners fault for giving his employee that impression. -
-
-
Part of building a franchise QB is letting him take his bumps in the road like a man. Let him come out the following week and bounce back. This doesn't help Henne's production whatsoever. It will NOT get him better being benched midway though the season.
-
Henne really struggled in his last 3 games.
Maybe they're throwing him a rope. -
-
-
-
Pennington is not the man to take the team to the promised land, but is merely being inserted because it may be the best (and safest) way to get to at least 9 wins. Sparano is conservative, and he knows what Pennington will give him. -
Page 1 of 2